Discordance in crown-rump length and nuchal translucency thickness in the prediction of adverse outcomes among monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies: A single-center retrospective cohort study from Vietnam

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.70018
Thuy Phuong Tran Thi, Thu Huong Trinh Nhut, Minh Doan Dang, Hong Cuc Ho Nguyen Thi, Phuc Nhon Nguyen
{"title":"Discordance in crown-rump length and nuchal translucency thickness in the prediction of adverse outcomes among monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies: A single-center retrospective cohort study from Vietnam","authors":"Thuy Phuong Tran Thi,&nbsp;Thu Huong Trinh Nhut,&nbsp;Minh Doan Dang,&nbsp;Hong Cuc Ho Nguyen Thi,&nbsp;Phuc Nhon Nguyen","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the usefulness of first-trimester crown-rump length (CRL) and nuchal translucency (NT) thickness discordance in predicting adverse outcomes in monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective cohort study enrolled MCDA twin pregnancies in which CRL and NT were measured at 11–13<sup>+6</sup> weeks of pregnancy and collected for pregnancy outcomes between January 2022 and June 2023 at Tu Du Hospital in Vietnam. The intertwin discrepancy of CRL and NT was calculated as a percentage of the larger fetuses and smaller fetuses. Regression analysis was used to determine the significance of the association between the intertwin discordance in NT and CRL and the development of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), fetal growth restriction (FGR), intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD), and those with normal outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to evaluate the performance of inter-twin discrepancy in the prediction of FGR, TTTS, and IUFD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 294 MCDA twin pregnancies were studied. Among them, 149 cases (50.7%) had at least one adverse outcome. The complications included TTTS in 82 cases (55.0%), FGR in 89 cases (59.7%), one IUFD in 95 cases (63.8%), and two IUFDs in 19 cases (12.8%). CRL discordance greater than 10.0% and NT discordance greater than 20.0% were not related to TTTS and IUFD, only to FGR. A CRL discordance greater than 20.0% decreased the survival rate of fetuses. CRL discordance greater than 10.0% had specificity in diagnosing TTTS, IUFD, and FGR of more than 80%, whereas, NT discordance greater than 20.0% had specificity in detecting these complications of more than 50.0%. A predictive model including CRL and NT discordance showed a poor value with area under the curve of:0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.69–0.75).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In MCDA twin pregnancies, discordant CRL greater than 10.0% was related to FGR. Meanwhile, an intertwin discordance of NT thickness greater than 20.0% was not related to TTTS, FGR, and IUFD. However, adequate surveillance is still required.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":"170 1","pages":"478-488"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijgo.70018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the usefulness of first-trimester crown-rump length (CRL) and nuchal translucency (NT) thickness discordance in predicting adverse outcomes in monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study enrolled MCDA twin pregnancies in which CRL and NT were measured at 11–13+6 weeks of pregnancy and collected for pregnancy outcomes between January 2022 and June 2023 at Tu Du Hospital in Vietnam. The intertwin discrepancy of CRL and NT was calculated as a percentage of the larger fetuses and smaller fetuses. Regression analysis was used to determine the significance of the association between the intertwin discordance in NT and CRL and the development of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), fetal growth restriction (FGR), intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD), and those with normal outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to evaluate the performance of inter-twin discrepancy in the prediction of FGR, TTTS, and IUFD.

Results

A total of 294 MCDA twin pregnancies were studied. Among them, 149 cases (50.7%) had at least one adverse outcome. The complications included TTTS in 82 cases (55.0%), FGR in 89 cases (59.7%), one IUFD in 95 cases (63.8%), and two IUFDs in 19 cases (12.8%). CRL discordance greater than 10.0% and NT discordance greater than 20.0% were not related to TTTS and IUFD, only to FGR. A CRL discordance greater than 20.0% decreased the survival rate of fetuses. CRL discordance greater than 10.0% had specificity in diagnosing TTTS, IUFD, and FGR of more than 80%, whereas, NT discordance greater than 20.0% had specificity in detecting these complications of more than 50.0%. A predictive model including CRL and NT discordance showed a poor value with area under the curve of:0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.69–0.75).

Conclusion

In MCDA twin pregnancies, discordant CRL greater than 10.0% was related to FGR. Meanwhile, an intertwin discordance of NT thickness greater than 20.0% was not related to TTTS, FGR, and IUFD. However, adequate surveillance is still required.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在单绒毛膜双羊膜双胎妊娠中预测不良结局的冠臀长度和颈透明厚度的不一致:来自越南的一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
目的:评价冠臀长度(CRL)和颈透明度(NT)厚度差异在预测单绒毛膜双羊膜(MCDA)双胎妊娠不良结局中的价值。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了MCDA双胎妊娠,在妊娠11-13+6周时测量CRL和NT,并收集2022年1月至2023年6月期间在越南Tu Du医院的妊娠结局。以大胎和小胎的百分比计算CRL和NT的双胞胎间差异。采用回归分析确定双胎间NT和CRL不一致与双胎输血综合征(TTTS)、胎儿生长受限(FGR)、宫内死胎(IUFD)及正常结局发生之间的相关性。构建受试者工作特征曲线,评价双胎间差异在预测FGR、TTTS和IUFD中的作用。结果:共对294例MCDA双胎妊娠进行了研究。其中149例(50.7%)至少有一种不良反应。并发症包括TTTS 82例(55.0%),FGR 89例(59.7%),IUFD 1例(63.8%),IUFD 2例(12.8%)。CRL不一致性大于10.0%和NT不一致性大于20.0%与TTTS和IUFD无关,仅与FGR有关。CRL差异大于20.0%会降低胎儿存活率。CRL不一致性大于10.0%对TTTS、IUFD和FGR的诊断特异性大于80%,而NT不一致性大于20.0%对这些并发症的诊断特异性大于50.0%。包含CRL和NT不一致性的预测模型值较差,曲线下面积为:0.69(95%置信区间为0.69 ~ 0.75)。结论:在MCDA双胎妊娠中,不一致CRL大于10.0%与FGR有关。同时,NT厚度不一致大于20.0%与TTTS、FGR和IUFD无关。然而,仍然需要充分的监督。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
Comparative effectiveness of curettage, uterine artery embolization, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist therapy in the management of acquired uterine enhanced myometrial vascularity/arteriovenous malformation (EMV/AVM) and retained products of conception (RPOC): A retrospective cohort study. Efficacy-oriented approach for medium-sized follicles: A perspective on stimulation, expectation, and triggering strategy in IVF cycles. Interstitial pregnancy following ipsilateral salpingectomy: A case report. Predictors for intrapartum cesarean delivery after labor induction for suspected fetal growth restriction at term. Effect of preoperative intravenous iron administration on transfusion outcomes in benign gynecologic surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1