Clarifying the characteristics of interprofessional rehabilitation programs for adults with chronic low back pain: A scoping review.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1177/10538127241290643
Sintayehu Daba Wami, Mulugeta Bayisa Chala, Sara Yirgalem Wolde, Catherine Donnelly, Kassahun Alemu Gelaye, Abdul Pullatayil, Esayas Adefris, Jordan Miller
{"title":"Clarifying the characteristics of interprofessional rehabilitation programs for adults with chronic low back pain: A scoping review.","authors":"Sintayehu Daba Wami, Mulugeta Bayisa Chala, Sara Yirgalem Wolde, Catherine Donnelly, Kassahun Alemu Gelaye, Abdul Pullatayil, Esayas Adefris, Jordan Miller","doi":"10.1177/10538127241290643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interprofessional rehabilitation programs are recommended by practice guidelines based on their effectiveness in improving health-related quality of life, pain, and function for people with chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, the most appropriate program characteristics are poorly described in the literature.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aimed to synthesize the characteristics of interprofessional rehabilitation programs for people living with CLBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The scoping review was guided by the framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley, which has been further enhanced by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Electronic databases, including Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, were searched to identify relevant published studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 13370 articles identified through our search, seventy-nine studies fulfilled our eligibility criteria. In the majority of the studies (n = 75), interprofessional rehabilitation programs for people with CLBP consisted of two or more of the following interventions: physical activity and exercise (n = 68), education (n = 61), psychotherapy (n = 52), and vocational support/advice (n = 31). In a few studies describing the underlying theories, the biopsychosocial model, which emphasizes the need to address social, psychological, and physical components in the management of CLBP, was the most often cited theoretical framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is substantial variation in how interprofessional rehabilitation programs for people with CLBP are conceptualized and evaluated. A detailed description of the intervention evaluated, and the underlying theoretical frameworks was also lacking in most studies. We recommend the use of a consistent term and components aligned with practice guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":"38 1","pages":"4-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127241290643","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Interprofessional rehabilitation programs are recommended by practice guidelines based on their effectiveness in improving health-related quality of life, pain, and function for people with chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, the most appropriate program characteristics are poorly described in the literature.

Objective: This scoping review aimed to synthesize the characteristics of interprofessional rehabilitation programs for people living with CLBP.

Methods: The scoping review was guided by the framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley, which has been further enhanced by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Electronic databases, including Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, were searched to identify relevant published studies.

Results: Out of 13370 articles identified through our search, seventy-nine studies fulfilled our eligibility criteria. In the majority of the studies (n = 75), interprofessional rehabilitation programs for people with CLBP consisted of two or more of the following interventions: physical activity and exercise (n = 68), education (n = 61), psychotherapy (n = 52), and vocational support/advice (n = 31). In a few studies describing the underlying theories, the biopsychosocial model, which emphasizes the need to address social, psychological, and physical components in the management of CLBP, was the most often cited theoretical framework.

Conclusion: There is substantial variation in how interprofessional rehabilitation programs for people with CLBP are conceptualized and evaluated. A detailed description of the intervention evaluated, and the underlying theoretical frameworks was also lacking in most studies. We recommend the use of a consistent term and components aligned with practice guidelines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澄清成人慢性腰痛的跨专业康复方案的特点:一项范围综述。
背景:实践指南基于跨专业康复方案在改善慢性腰痛(CLBP)患者健康相关生活质量、疼痛和功能方面的有效性而推荐。然而,最合适的程序特征在文献中描述得很少。目的:本综述旨在综合CLBP患者跨专业康复方案的特点。方法:以Arksey和O'Malley开发的框架为指导,并由乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)进一步完善。检索了包括Ovid MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、SCOPUS、PubMed、Web of Science和Cochrane Library在内的电子数据库,以确定相关已发表的研究。结果:在我们检索到的13370篇文章中,有79篇研究符合我们的入选标准。在大多数研究中(n = 75),针对CLBP患者的跨专业康复计划包括以下两种或两种以上的干预措施:体育活动和锻炼(n = 68),教育(n = 61),心理治疗(n = 52)和职业支持/建议(n = 31)。在一些描述潜在理论的研究中,生物心理社会模型是最常被引用的理论框架,它强调在CLBP管理中需要解决社会、心理和生理因素。结论:对CLBP患者的跨专业康复方案的概念化和评估存在实质性差异。大多数研究也缺乏对所评估的干预措施的详细描述和潜在的理论框架。我们建议使用与实践指南一致的术语和组件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
期刊最新文献
Altered transversus abdominis and internal oblique muscle activation during cervical motor control tasks in individuals with chronic neck pain: A surface EMG-based analysis. Effectiveness of intermittent hypoxia-hyperoxia therapy for pain and general health in adults with musculoskeletal dysfunctions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Bend the fingers: Ehlers Danlos syndrome and the associated disorders that impact treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Effectiveness of balance training in people with chronic ankle instability: An Umbrella review with meta-meta-analysis. Acute effects of posterior tibial nerve percutaneous neuromodulation on postural control in individuals with chronic ankle instability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1