Clinical efficacy of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures with negative medial cortical support: A comparison of lithotomy and scissor position techniques.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1177/10538127241289347
Zhe Lin, Weidong Chen, Wenchao Zhou
{"title":"Clinical efficacy of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures with negative medial cortical support: A comparison of lithotomy and scissor position techniques.","authors":"Zhe Lin, Weidong Chen, Wenchao Zhou","doi":"10.1177/10538127241289347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Femoral intertrochanteric fractures are a prevalent type of hip fracture among the elderly population. And proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) is the leading surgical technique for managing femoral intertrochanteric fractures in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in managing intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients with negative medial cortical support. Additionally, the outcomes associated with two different nail positioning techniques were investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures with negative medial cortical support, treated between January 2017 and January 2021, were included. A retrospective analysis of their clinical data was conducted. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the positioning technique: lithotomy position group (n = 40) and scissor position group (n = 40). Baseline characteristics, perioperative indicators, hidden blood loss, and Harris hip scores were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The groups exhibited no significant differences in baseline characteristics, incision length, or postoperative tip-apex distance. The scissor position group experienced fewer fluoroscopies, shorter surgical durations, and lower Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for the unaffected limb on postoperative day 1 compared to the lithotomy position group. No significant differences in hidden blood loss were observed between the groups. The Harris hip score for the unaffected side showed no significant differences between the scissor position group on postoperative day 1 and postoperative month 1. However, in the lithotomy position group, the Harris hip score of the unaffected side on postoperative day 1 was significantly lower than that at postoperative month 1. Additionally, the Harris hip score for the unaffected side on postoperative day 1 was substantially higher in the scissor position group compared to the lithotomy position group, although there were no significant differences between the two groups at postoperative month 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PFNA in the scissor position demonstrated advantages over the lithotomy position, including reduced fluoroscopy usage, shorter surgical duration, and less trauma to the unaffected limb. These findings indicate its effectiveness in managing intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients with negative medial cortical support.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":"38 1","pages":"113-120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127241289347","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Femoral intertrochanteric fractures are a prevalent type of hip fracture among the elderly population. And proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) is the leading surgical technique for managing femoral intertrochanteric fractures in this patient population.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in managing intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients with negative medial cortical support. Additionally, the outcomes associated with two different nail positioning techniques were investigated.

Methods: Elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures with negative medial cortical support, treated between January 2017 and January 2021, were included. A retrospective analysis of their clinical data was conducted. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the positioning technique: lithotomy position group (n = 40) and scissor position group (n = 40). Baseline characteristics, perioperative indicators, hidden blood loss, and Harris hip scores were compared.

Results: The groups exhibited no significant differences in baseline characteristics, incision length, or postoperative tip-apex distance. The scissor position group experienced fewer fluoroscopies, shorter surgical durations, and lower Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for the unaffected limb on postoperative day 1 compared to the lithotomy position group. No significant differences in hidden blood loss were observed between the groups. The Harris hip score for the unaffected side showed no significant differences between the scissor position group on postoperative day 1 and postoperative month 1. However, in the lithotomy position group, the Harris hip score of the unaffected side on postoperative day 1 was significantly lower than that at postoperative month 1. Additionally, the Harris hip score for the unaffected side on postoperative day 1 was substantially higher in the scissor position group compared to the lithotomy position group, although there were no significant differences between the two groups at postoperative month 1.

Conclusion: PFNA in the scissor position demonstrated advantages over the lithotomy position, including reduced fluoroscopy usage, shorter surgical duration, and less trauma to the unaffected limb. These findings indicate its effectiveness in managing intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients with negative medial cortical support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
期刊最新文献
Rehabilitation effect of aquatic exercise on motor function in children with cerebral palsy: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Comparison of the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and trigger point dry needling in the treatment of Calcaneal Epin- A randomized trial. Palpation-based scapular dyskinesis test: Inter-and intra-rater reliability and clinical advantages. Effects of neural mobilization on respiratory parameters, pain, range of motion, and neck awareness in patients with chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. Pilot randomized controlled trial of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for temporomandibular joint disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1