An experimental study on subharmonic-aided pressure estimation with commercial scanners.

IF 2.3 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ACOUSTICS Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1121/10.0035574
Yi-Fan Dong, Li Zhang, Yao Chen, Wei Jiang, Ji-Feng Tian, Dan Chen, Ya-Hong Wang, Ying Wang, Xin Wang, Zhi-Tong Ge, Xiao Yang, Xiao-Dong Han, Jian-Chu Li
{"title":"An experimental study on subharmonic-aided pressure estimation with commercial scanners.","authors":"Yi-Fan Dong, Li Zhang, Yao Chen, Wei Jiang, Ji-Feng Tian, Dan Chen, Ya-Hong Wang, Ying Wang, Xin Wang, Zhi-Tong Ge, Xiao Yang, Xiao-Dong Han, Jian-Chu Li","doi":"10.1121/10.0035574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates the performance of subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) with ultrasound contrast agents using data obtained from calibration procedures. A commercial scanner of ultrasonography (GE Healthcare Logiq E20, Wuxi, China) was used to perform SHAPE on a flowing contrast agent (Sonazoid) in a phantom setup under controlled microbubble stability and flow velocity conditions. Subharmonic time-intensity curves were collected during the SHAPE calibration procedure for analysis. Subharmonic amplitude of diluted contrast agents exhibited a time-dependent decline but was not affected by velocity. SHAPE sensitivity was measured through reciprocal pressurizing and depressurizing sequences to mitigate the effect of subharmonic decline over time. A wide range of mechanical index (MI) levels within the steady growth phase of the calibration curve showed higher SHAPE sensitivity compared to the traditionally recommended \"optimal\" MI at the maximum slope. The approximate maximum SHAPE sensitivity was -0.04 dB/mm Hg. Subharmonic amplitude was linearly correlated with pressure at a range of MI levels (R2 > 0.9, p < 0.05) but showed significant variations (approximately 2 dB standard deviation) in the time series. The lowered sensitivity compared to previous reports, combined with the substantial variation in subharmonic amplitude, raises concerns about the accuracy and consistency of SHAPE in clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":17168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"157 2","pages":"1322-1335"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0035574","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the performance of subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) with ultrasound contrast agents using data obtained from calibration procedures. A commercial scanner of ultrasonography (GE Healthcare Logiq E20, Wuxi, China) was used to perform SHAPE on a flowing contrast agent (Sonazoid) in a phantom setup under controlled microbubble stability and flow velocity conditions. Subharmonic time-intensity curves were collected during the SHAPE calibration procedure for analysis. Subharmonic amplitude of diluted contrast agents exhibited a time-dependent decline but was not affected by velocity. SHAPE sensitivity was measured through reciprocal pressurizing and depressurizing sequences to mitigate the effect of subharmonic decline over time. A wide range of mechanical index (MI) levels within the steady growth phase of the calibration curve showed higher SHAPE sensitivity compared to the traditionally recommended "optimal" MI at the maximum slope. The approximate maximum SHAPE sensitivity was -0.04 dB/mm Hg. Subharmonic amplitude was linearly correlated with pressure at a range of MI levels (R2 > 0.9, p < 0.05) but showed significant variations (approximately 2 dB standard deviation) in the time series. The lowered sensitivity compared to previous reports, combined with the substantial variation in subharmonic amplitude, raises concerns about the accuracy and consistency of SHAPE in clinical applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
商用扫描仪辅助次谐波压力估计的实验研究。
本研究利用从校准程序中获得的数据评估超声造影剂的次谐波辅助压力估计(SHAPE)的性能。在受控微泡稳定性和流速条件下,使用商用超声扫描仪(GE Healthcare Logiq E20,中国无锡)对流动造影剂(Sonazoid)在幻影装置中进行SHAPE。在SHAPE校准过程中收集次谐波时间强度曲线进行分析。稀释造影剂的次谐波振幅表现出随时间的下降,但不受速度的影响。SHAPE灵敏度是通过反向加压和减压序列来测量的,以减轻次谐波随时间下降的影响。与传统上推荐的最大斜率处的“最佳”力学指数(MI)水平相比,校准曲线稳定生长阶段的大范围力学指数(MI)水平显示出更高的SHAPE灵敏度。SHAPE的最大近似灵敏度为-0.04 dB/mm Hg。在MI水平范围内,次谐波振幅与压力呈线性相关(R2 > 0.9, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1433
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Since 1929 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America has been the leading source of theoretical and experimental research results in the broad interdisciplinary study of sound. Subject coverage includes: linear and nonlinear acoustics; aeroacoustics, underwater sound and acoustical oceanography; ultrasonics and quantum acoustics; architectural and structural acoustics and vibration; speech, music and noise; psychology and physiology of hearing; engineering acoustics, transduction; bioacoustics, animal bioacoustics.
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Effect of ambisonic order on spatial release from masking [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 156(4), 2169-2176 (2024)]. Is pitch a smooth function of frequency? Evidence from octave adjustments. Multiple ultrasound image generation based on tuned alignment of amplitude hologram over spatially non-uniform ultrasound source. The image model applied to concert halls. Propeller self-noise suppression algorithm for unmanned underwater vehicles based on a two-stage denoising-inpainting framework.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1