Yi-Fan Dong, Li Zhang, Yao Chen, Wei Jiang, Ji-Feng Tian, Dan Chen, Ya-Hong Wang, Ying Wang, Xin Wang, Zhi-Tong Ge, Xiao Yang, Xiao-Dong Han, Jian-Chu Li
{"title":"An experimental study on subharmonic-aided pressure estimation with commercial scanners.","authors":"Yi-Fan Dong, Li Zhang, Yao Chen, Wei Jiang, Ji-Feng Tian, Dan Chen, Ya-Hong Wang, Ying Wang, Xin Wang, Zhi-Tong Ge, Xiao Yang, Xiao-Dong Han, Jian-Chu Li","doi":"10.1121/10.0035574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates the performance of subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) with ultrasound contrast agents using data obtained from calibration procedures. A commercial scanner of ultrasonography (GE Healthcare Logiq E20, Wuxi, China) was used to perform SHAPE on a flowing contrast agent (Sonazoid) in a phantom setup under controlled microbubble stability and flow velocity conditions. Subharmonic time-intensity curves were collected during the SHAPE calibration procedure for analysis. Subharmonic amplitude of diluted contrast agents exhibited a time-dependent decline but was not affected by velocity. SHAPE sensitivity was measured through reciprocal pressurizing and depressurizing sequences to mitigate the effect of subharmonic decline over time. A wide range of mechanical index (MI) levels within the steady growth phase of the calibration curve showed higher SHAPE sensitivity compared to the traditionally recommended \"optimal\" MI at the maximum slope. The approximate maximum SHAPE sensitivity was -0.04 dB/mm Hg. Subharmonic amplitude was linearly correlated with pressure at a range of MI levels (R2 > 0.9, p < 0.05) but showed significant variations (approximately 2 dB standard deviation) in the time series. The lowered sensitivity compared to previous reports, combined with the substantial variation in subharmonic amplitude, raises concerns about the accuracy and consistency of SHAPE in clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":17168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"157 2","pages":"1322-1335"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0035574","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluates the performance of subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) with ultrasound contrast agents using data obtained from calibration procedures. A commercial scanner of ultrasonography (GE Healthcare Logiq E20, Wuxi, China) was used to perform SHAPE on a flowing contrast agent (Sonazoid) in a phantom setup under controlled microbubble stability and flow velocity conditions. Subharmonic time-intensity curves were collected during the SHAPE calibration procedure for analysis. Subharmonic amplitude of diluted contrast agents exhibited a time-dependent decline but was not affected by velocity. SHAPE sensitivity was measured through reciprocal pressurizing and depressurizing sequences to mitigate the effect of subharmonic decline over time. A wide range of mechanical index (MI) levels within the steady growth phase of the calibration curve showed higher SHAPE sensitivity compared to the traditionally recommended "optimal" MI at the maximum slope. The approximate maximum SHAPE sensitivity was -0.04 dB/mm Hg. Subharmonic amplitude was linearly correlated with pressure at a range of MI levels (R2 > 0.9, p < 0.05) but showed significant variations (approximately 2 dB standard deviation) in the time series. The lowered sensitivity compared to previous reports, combined with the substantial variation in subharmonic amplitude, raises concerns about the accuracy and consistency of SHAPE in clinical applications.
期刊介绍:
Since 1929 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America has been the leading source of theoretical and experimental research results in the broad interdisciplinary study of sound. Subject coverage includes: linear and nonlinear acoustics; aeroacoustics, underwater sound and acoustical oceanography; ultrasonics and quantum acoustics; architectural and structural acoustics and vibration; speech, music and noise; psychology and physiology of hearing; engineering acoustics, transduction; bioacoustics, animal bioacoustics.