Long-term outcomes of concomitant Cox-Maze III procedure in patients with aortic valve diseases and preoperative atrial fibrillation.

Abstract

Background: There was limited evidence on the clinical benefits of the concomitant Cox-Maze procedure with aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with atrial fibrillation. This study aimed to evaluate the early and long-term results of the concomitant Cox-Maze procedure in patients undergoing AVR for aortic valve disease.

Methods: We enrolled 101 patients who underwent AVR and had preoperative atrial fibrillation between January 1994 and December 2020. The early- and long-term clinical outcomes were compared between patients who underwent the concomitant Cox-Maze III procedures and those who did not undergo surgical ablation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for differences in preoperative characteristics.

Results: Forty-seven patients underwent the concomitant Cox-Maze III procedure (CM group), and 54 patients did not undergo surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (non-CM group). There were no significant differences in early surgical outcomes between the two groups, except for a higher occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in the CM group (P<0.001). The median follow-up duration was 70.7 months (interquartile range 36.2-118.8 months), and there were no significant differences in overall survival, thromboembolic complications, and anticoagulation-related bleeding between the two groups. Atrial fibrillation occurrence was significantly lower (P<0.001) in the CM group, and a greater number of patients discontinued anticoagulation in the CM group compared to the non-CM group (P=0.001).

Conclusions: The concomitant Cox-Maze procedure in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing AVR did not increase early mortality or morbidity, except for AKI, and showed favorable long-term results in terms of rhythm outcome and anticoagulation discontinuation.