Quality of Life Among Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective Nationwide Multicenter Study.

IF 16.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.6004/jnccn.2024.7091
Leonard W F Seelen, Simone Augustinus, Thomas F Stoop, Stefan A W Bouwense, Olivier R Busch, Geert A Cirkel, Casper H J van Eijck, Judith de Vos-Geelen, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Nadia Haj Mohammad, Ignace H J T de Hingh, Evelien van Alphen, Marjolein Y V Homs, Mike S L Liem, Maartje Los, Vincent E de Meijer, Leonie J M Mekenkamp, Mirjam A G Sprangers, Martijn W J Stommel, Johanna W Wilmink, Marc G Besselink, Hjalmar C van Santvoort, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, I Quintus Molenaar
{"title":"Quality of Life Among Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective Nationwide Multicenter Study.","authors":"Leonard W F Seelen, Simone Augustinus, Thomas F Stoop, Stefan A W Bouwense, Olivier R Busch, Geert A Cirkel, Casper H J van Eijck, Judith de Vos-Geelen, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Nadia Haj Mohammad, Ignace H J T de Hingh, Evelien van Alphen, Marjolein Y V Homs, Mike S L Liem, Maartje Los, Vincent E de Meijer, Leonie J M Mekenkamp, Mirjam A G Sprangers, Martijn W J Stommel, Johanna W Wilmink, Marc G Besselink, Hjalmar C van Santvoort, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, I Quintus Molenaar","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health care providers of patients with cancer should discuss the impact of treatment, such as multiagent chemotherapy and surgery, on quality of life (QoL). However, in the era of shared decision-making, data on QoL in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) remain scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective multicenter study involving patients with LAPC across 13 Dutch centers. These patients were included in both the LAPC registry and the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Project (PACAP; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03513705). The study evaluated QoL over time and assessed the impact of treatment. The primary outcome was global health status (GHS) based on the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Secondary outcomes included functioning and symptom scores from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ Pancreatic Cancer Module (QLQ-PAN26). Outcomes were measured at diagnosis and at 3-month intervals up to 12 months. Outcomes were compared over time and between groups, with both statistical and clinical significance (Δ ≥10 points) evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 170 patients completed at least one QoL-questionnaire. Most patients (n=152; 89%) received tumor-directed treatment, including 116 (68%) who received chemotherapy (± radiotherapy) alone and 36 (21%) who underwent chemotherapy (± radiotherapy) followed by resection; 18 (11%) patients received best supportive care (BSC). At baseline, GHS was highest among patients who received chemotherapy + resection (mean [SD], 70 [16]) compared with those receiving chemotherapy alone (mean [SD], 64 [20]) and BSC (mean [SD], 48 [21]) (P=.001). The overall mean [SD] GHS at baseline was 63 [20] and remained stable over time (P=.27), including in patients receiving tumor-directed treatment (P=.57). One-third of the QoL subscales (9/28) showed statistically and clinically significant changes over time. Improvements were observed in appetite loss, pancreatic pain, and hepatic symptoms, although patients reported increased diarrhea, flatulence, altered bowel habits, and financial difficulties. Over time, patients reported reduced fear of future health, but a decline in health care satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This multicenter study demonstrated that general QoL remained stable during the first year in patients with LAPC, 89% of whom received tumor-directed treatment. Certain symptoms worsened and deserve greater attention from health care providers. These findings can guide shared decision-making and improve symptom management.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":"97-104"},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.7091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health care providers of patients with cancer should discuss the impact of treatment, such as multiagent chemotherapy and surgery, on quality of life (QoL). However, in the era of shared decision-making, data on QoL in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) remain scarce.

Methods: We performed a prospective multicenter study involving patients with LAPC across 13 Dutch centers. These patients were included in both the LAPC registry and the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Project (PACAP; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03513705). The study evaluated QoL over time and assessed the impact of treatment. The primary outcome was global health status (GHS) based on the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Secondary outcomes included functioning and symptom scores from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ Pancreatic Cancer Module (QLQ-PAN26). Outcomes were measured at diagnosis and at 3-month intervals up to 12 months. Outcomes were compared over time and between groups, with both statistical and clinical significance (Δ ≥10 points) evaluated.

Results: A total of 170 patients completed at least one QoL-questionnaire. Most patients (n=152; 89%) received tumor-directed treatment, including 116 (68%) who received chemotherapy (± radiotherapy) alone and 36 (21%) who underwent chemotherapy (± radiotherapy) followed by resection; 18 (11%) patients received best supportive care (BSC). At baseline, GHS was highest among patients who received chemotherapy + resection (mean [SD], 70 [16]) compared with those receiving chemotherapy alone (mean [SD], 64 [20]) and BSC (mean [SD], 48 [21]) (P=.001). The overall mean [SD] GHS at baseline was 63 [20] and remained stable over time (P=.27), including in patients receiving tumor-directed treatment (P=.57). One-third of the QoL subscales (9/28) showed statistically and clinically significant changes over time. Improvements were observed in appetite loss, pancreatic pain, and hepatic symptoms, although patients reported increased diarrhea, flatulence, altered bowel habits, and financial difficulties. Over time, patients reported reduced fear of future health, but a decline in health care satisfaction.

Conclusions: This multicenter study demonstrated that general QoL remained stable during the first year in patients with LAPC, 89% of whom received tumor-directed treatment. Certain symptoms worsened and deserve greater attention from health care providers. These findings can guide shared decision-making and improve symptom management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部晚期胰腺癌患者的生活质量:一项前瞻性全国多中心研究
背景:癌症患者的医疗保健提供者应该讨论治疗,如多药化疗和手术,对生活质量(QoL)的影响。然而,在共同决策的时代,局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC)的生活质量数据仍然很少。方法:我们对荷兰13个中心的LAPC患者进行了一项前瞻性多中心研究。这些患者被纳入LAPC登记处和荷兰胰腺癌项目(PACAP;ClinicalTrials.gov识别码:NCT03513705)。该研究评估了随时间推移的生活质量,并评估了治疗的影响。主要终点是基于EORTC生活质量问卷- core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)的全球健康状况(GHS)。次要结果包括EORTC QLQ- c30和EORTC QLQ胰腺癌模块(QLQ- pan26)的功能和症状评分。结果在诊断时和每隔3个月至12个月测量一次。结果随时间和组间比较,评估统计学和临床意义(Δ≥10分)。结果:170例患者完成了至少一份生活质量问卷。大多数患者(n=152;89%)接受肿瘤定向治疗,其中单独化疗(±放疗)116例(68%),化疗(±放疗)后切除36例(21%);18例(11%)患者接受了最佳支持治疗(BSC)。基线时,与单纯化疗(mean [SD], 64[20])和BSC (mean [SD], 48[21])患者相比,化疗+切除术患者的GHS最高(mean [SD], 70 [20]) (P=.001)。基线时的总体平均[SD] GHS为63 bb0,并随着时间的推移保持稳定(P= 0.27),包括接受肿瘤定向治疗的患者(P= 0.57)。三分之一的生活质量亚量表(9/28)随着时间的推移出现统计学和临床显著变化。食欲减退、胰腺疼痛和肝脏症状均有改善,但患者报告腹泻、胀气加重、排便习惯改变和经济困难。随着时间的推移,患者报告对未来健康的恐惧减少,但对医疗保健的满意度下降。结论:这项多中心研究表明,LAPC患者的总体生活质量在第一年保持稳定,其中89%的患者接受了肿瘤定向治疗。某些症状恶化,值得卫生保健提供者给予更多关注。这些发现可以指导共同决策和改善症状管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a peer-reviewed medical journal read by over 25,000 oncologists and cancer care professionals nationwide. This indexed publication delivers the latest insights into best clinical practices, oncology health services research, and translational medicine. Notably, JNCCN provides updates on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology® (NCCN Guidelines®), review articles elaborating on guideline recommendations, health services research, and case reports that spotlight molecular insights in patient care. Guided by its vision, JNCCN seeks to advance the mission of NCCN by serving as the primary resource for information on NCCN Guidelines®, innovation in translational medicine, and scientific studies related to oncology health services research. This encompasses quality care and value, bioethics, comparative and cost effectiveness, public policy, and interventional research on supportive care and survivorship. JNCCN boasts indexing by prominent databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, EmCare, and Scopus, reinforcing its standing as a reputable source for comprehensive information in the field of oncology.
期刊最新文献
How Healthy Are the Diets of Cancer Survivors? Characteristics of Those Most at Risk and Opportunities for Improvement. Assessing the Performance of the PREDICT Breast Version 3.0 Prognostic Tool in Patients With Breast Cancer in the United States. A Case of Cryptic CBFB::MYH11 Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Noncanonical Breakpoints Detected by Optical Genome Mapping. Authors' Reply to the Letter to the Editor by Kim et al: Are We Asking the Right Question for New Biomarkers - "Ready for Prime Time" Versus Demonstrated Clinical Utility? Letter to the Editor: Are We Asking the Right Question for New Biomarkers - "Ready for Prime Time" Versus Demonstrated Clinical Utility?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1