Quality of Life Among Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective Nationwide Multicenter Study.

IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.6004/jnccn.2024.7091
Leonard W F Seelen, Simone Augustinus, Thomas F Stoop, Stefan A W Bouwense, Olivier R Busch, Geert A Cirkel, Casper H J van Eijck, Judith de Vos-Geelen, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Nadia Haj Mohammad, Ignace H J T de Hingh, Evelien van Alphen, Marjolein Y V Homs, Mike S L Liem, Maartje Los, Vincent E de Meijer, Leonie J M Mekenkamp, Mirjam A G Sprangers, Martijn W J Stommel, Johanna W Wilmink, Marc G Besselink, Hjalmar C van Santvoort, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, I Quintus Molenaar
{"title":"Quality of Life Among Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective Nationwide Multicenter Study.","authors":"Leonard W F Seelen, Simone Augustinus, Thomas F Stoop, Stefan A W Bouwense, Olivier R Busch, Geert A Cirkel, Casper H J van Eijck, Judith de Vos-Geelen, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Nadia Haj Mohammad, Ignace H J T de Hingh, Evelien van Alphen, Marjolein Y V Homs, Mike S L Liem, Maartje Los, Vincent E de Meijer, Leonie J M Mekenkamp, Mirjam A G Sprangers, Martijn W J Stommel, Johanna W Wilmink, Marc G Besselink, Hjalmar C van Santvoort, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, I Quintus Molenaar","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health care providers of patients with cancer should discuss the impact of treatment, such as multiagent chemotherapy and surgery, on quality of life (QoL). However, in the era of shared decision-making, data on QoL in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) remain scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective multicenter study involving patients with LAPC across 13 Dutch centers. These patients were included in both the LAPC registry and the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Project (PACAP; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03513705). The study evaluated QoL over time and assessed the impact of treatment. The primary outcome was global health status (GHS) based on the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Secondary outcomes included functioning and symptom scores from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ Pancreatic Cancer Module (QLQ-PAN26). Outcomes were measured at diagnosis and at 3-month intervals up to 12 months. Outcomes were compared over time and between groups, with both statistical and clinical significance (Δ ≥10 points) evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 170 patients completed at least one QoL-questionnaire. Most patients (n=152; 89%) received tumor-directed treatment, including 116 (68%) who received chemotherapy (± radiotherapy) alone and 36 (21%) who underwent chemotherapy (± radiotherapy) followed by resection; 18 (11%) patients received best supportive care (BSC). At baseline, GHS was highest among patients who received chemotherapy + resection (mean [SD], 70 [16]) compared with those receiving chemotherapy alone (mean [SD], 64 [20]) and BSC (mean [SD], 48 [21]) (P=.001). The overall mean [SD] GHS at baseline was 63 [20] and remained stable over time (P=.27), including in patients receiving tumor-directed treatment (P=.57). One-third of the QoL subscales (9/28) showed statistically and clinically significant changes over time. Improvements were observed in appetite loss, pancreatic pain, and hepatic symptoms, although patients reported increased diarrhea, flatulence, altered bowel habits, and financial difficulties. Over time, patients reported reduced fear of future health, but a decline in health care satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This multicenter study demonstrated that general QoL remained stable during the first year in patients with LAPC, 89% of whom received tumor-directed treatment. Certain symptoms worsened and deserve greater attention from health care providers. These findings can guide shared decision-making and improve symptom management.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.7091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health care providers of patients with cancer should discuss the impact of treatment, such as multiagent chemotherapy and surgery, on quality of life (QoL). However, in the era of shared decision-making, data on QoL in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) remain scarce.

Methods: We performed a prospective multicenter study involving patients with LAPC across 13 Dutch centers. These patients were included in both the LAPC registry and the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Project (PACAP; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03513705). The study evaluated QoL over time and assessed the impact of treatment. The primary outcome was global health status (GHS) based on the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Secondary outcomes included functioning and symptom scores from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ Pancreatic Cancer Module (QLQ-PAN26). Outcomes were measured at diagnosis and at 3-month intervals up to 12 months. Outcomes were compared over time and between groups, with both statistical and clinical significance (Δ ≥10 points) evaluated.

Results: A total of 170 patients completed at least one QoL-questionnaire. Most patients (n=152; 89%) received tumor-directed treatment, including 116 (68%) who received chemotherapy (± radiotherapy) alone and 36 (21%) who underwent chemotherapy (± radiotherapy) followed by resection; 18 (11%) patients received best supportive care (BSC). At baseline, GHS was highest among patients who received chemotherapy + resection (mean [SD], 70 [16]) compared with those receiving chemotherapy alone (mean [SD], 64 [20]) and BSC (mean [SD], 48 [21]) (P=.001). The overall mean [SD] GHS at baseline was 63 [20] and remained stable over time (P=.27), including in patients receiving tumor-directed treatment (P=.57). One-third of the QoL subscales (9/28) showed statistically and clinically significant changes over time. Improvements were observed in appetite loss, pancreatic pain, and hepatic symptoms, although patients reported increased diarrhea, flatulence, altered bowel habits, and financial difficulties. Over time, patients reported reduced fear of future health, but a decline in health care satisfaction.

Conclusions: This multicenter study demonstrated that general QoL remained stable during the first year in patients with LAPC, 89% of whom received tumor-directed treatment. Certain symptoms worsened and deserve greater attention from health care providers. These findings can guide shared decision-making and improve symptom management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a peer-reviewed medical journal read by over 25,000 oncologists and cancer care professionals nationwide. This indexed publication delivers the latest insights into best clinical practices, oncology health services research, and translational medicine. Notably, JNCCN provides updates on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology® (NCCN Guidelines®), review articles elaborating on guideline recommendations, health services research, and case reports that spotlight molecular insights in patient care. Guided by its vision, JNCCN seeks to advance the mission of NCCN by serving as the primary resource for information on NCCN Guidelines®, innovation in translational medicine, and scientific studies related to oncology health services research. This encompasses quality care and value, bioethics, comparative and cost effectiveness, public policy, and interventional research on supportive care and survivorship. JNCCN boasts indexing by prominent databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, EmCare, and Scopus, reinforcing its standing as a reputable source for comprehensive information in the field of oncology.
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal Patient-Reported Outcomes in Older Adults With Aggressive Lymphomas Receiving Chemoimmunotherapy. Quality of Life Among Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective Nationwide Multicenter Study. "Off-Label" Use of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Negative or Unknown PD-L1 Status in Advanced Head and Neck Cancer. Association Between Nonfatal Self-Injury and Survival Following a Cancer Diagnosis: A Comparative Population-Based Cohort Study. Hemithyroidectomy Versus Total Thyroidectomy for Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A Chinese Nationwide Large-Scale Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1