Bubble curtains for noise mitigation: One vs two.

IF 2.3 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ACOUSTICS Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1121/10.0035817
Simon Beelen, Marten Nijhof, Christ de Jong, Leen van Wijngaarden, Dominik Krug
{"title":"Bubble curtains for noise mitigation: One vs two.","authors":"Simon Beelen, Marten Nijhof, Christ de Jong, Leen van Wijngaarden, Dominik Krug","doi":"10.1121/10.0035817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bubble curtains are widely used to protect marine life from exposure to harmful noise during offshore pile driving. However, operating a bubble curtain is costly and compliance with government noise regulations remains a challenge. It is therefore important to optimise the acoustic effect of the available compressed air. An interesting approach to achieving this is to split the air flow rate into two separate bubble curtains, rather than one single bubble curtain. This concept is tested both experimentally and numerically in this paper. The experiments and the model show the expected increase in performance of the supplied compressed air when it is split between two manifolds. An increased insertion loss of up to 11 dB is measured. This increase in performance is possibly due to the fact that the reflective properties of the bubble curtains are maintained even when the air flow rate is halved. In effect, by splitting the air flow between two manifolds, a second acoustic barrier is added. Additionally, the variations in the bubble curtain performance between individual measurements are shown to be largely caused by temporal variations in the air distribution within the curtain. The applicability of equivalent fluid models for bubble curtains is discussed, and it is shown that accounting for a gap in the bubble curtain, close to the manifold where the bubble curtain is not yet fully developed, results in better agreement between the modelled and the measured values of the insertion loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":17168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"157 2","pages":"1336-1355"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0035817","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bubble curtains are widely used to protect marine life from exposure to harmful noise during offshore pile driving. However, operating a bubble curtain is costly and compliance with government noise regulations remains a challenge. It is therefore important to optimise the acoustic effect of the available compressed air. An interesting approach to achieving this is to split the air flow rate into two separate bubble curtains, rather than one single bubble curtain. This concept is tested both experimentally and numerically in this paper. The experiments and the model show the expected increase in performance of the supplied compressed air when it is split between two manifolds. An increased insertion loss of up to 11 dB is measured. This increase in performance is possibly due to the fact that the reflective properties of the bubble curtains are maintained even when the air flow rate is halved. In effect, by splitting the air flow between two manifolds, a second acoustic barrier is added. Additionally, the variations in the bubble curtain performance between individual measurements are shown to be largely caused by temporal variations in the air distribution within the curtain. The applicability of equivalent fluid models for bubble curtains is discussed, and it is shown that accounting for a gap in the bubble curtain, close to the manifold where the bubble curtain is not yet fully developed, results in better agreement between the modelled and the measured values of the insertion loss.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少噪音的泡泡窗帘:一比二。
在海上打桩过程中,气泡幕被广泛用于保护海洋生物免受有害噪音的影响。然而,操作气泡幕的成本很高,而且遵守政府的噪音规定仍然是一个挑战。因此,优化可用压缩空气的声学效果非常重要。实现这一目标的一个有趣的方法是将气流分成两个独立的气泡幕,而不是一个单独的气泡幕。本文对这一概念进行了实验和数值验证。实验和模型表明,当供气在两个歧管之间分离时,供气性能得到了预期的提高。测量到增加的插入损耗高达11 dB。这种性能的提高可能是由于即使空气流量减半,气泡窗帘的反射特性也保持不变。实际上,通过在两个歧管之间分离气流,增加了第二个声障。此外,每次测量之间气泡幕性能的变化在很大程度上是由幕内空气分布的时间变化引起的。讨论了等效流体模型对气泡幕的适用性,结果表明,考虑气泡幕中靠近气泡幕尚未完全发展的流形的间隙,可以使插入损失的模拟值与实测值更吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1433
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Since 1929 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America has been the leading source of theoretical and experimental research results in the broad interdisciplinary study of sound. Subject coverage includes: linear and nonlinear acoustics; aeroacoustics, underwater sound and acoustical oceanography; ultrasonics and quantum acoustics; architectural and structural acoustics and vibration; speech, music and noise; psychology and physiology of hearing; engineering acoustics, transduction; bioacoustics, animal bioacoustics.
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Effect of ambisonic order on spatial release from masking [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 156(4), 2169-2176 (2024)]. Is pitch a smooth function of frequency? Evidence from octave adjustments. Multiple ultrasound image generation based on tuned alignment of amplitude hologram over spatially non-uniform ultrasound source. The image model applied to concert halls. Propeller self-noise suppression algorithm for unmanned underwater vehicles based on a two-stage denoising-inpainting framework.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1