Clinical outcome of urgent thoracoscopic surgery on complicated parapneumonic infection with short-term preoperative antibiotic usage.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Journal of thoracic disease Pub Date : 2025-01-24 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.21037/jtd-24-1331
Younggi Jung, Eunjue Yi, Sungho Lee, Jae Ho Chung
{"title":"Clinical outcome of urgent thoracoscopic surgery on complicated parapneumonic infection with short-term preoperative antibiotic usage.","authors":"Younggi Jung, Eunjue Yi, Sungho Lee, Jae Ho Chung","doi":"10.21037/jtd-24-1331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prompt initiation of antibiotics and drainage of infection source is essential in the management of pleural cavity infection. Although surgical drainage is considered a gold standard of treatment for unresolved parapneumonic infection, optimal timing for surgical intervention is still under debate. Thus, we seek to analyze the clinical outcomes of urgent thoracoscopic surgery for complicated parapneumonic effusion regarding the duration of preoperative antibiotic usage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patients who received thoracoscopic surgery for complicated parapneumonic effusion or empyema. Patients were grouped according to the preoperative antibiotic durations and compared. Group A consists of the patients with less than 3 days of preoperative antibiotics usage and Group B consists of those with more than 3 days of preoperative antibiotic coverage. Basic demographics, preoperative chest computed tomography (CT) findings, antibiotics usage, duration until surgery and treatment outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From February 2008 to November 2018, a total of 180 patients underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for pleural drainage or decortication of lung. Group A patients had higher C-reactive protein value (240 <i>vs</i>. 192 mg/L, P=0.003) and were given significantly shorter duration of total antibiotics (9 <i>vs</i>. 14 days, P<0.001). The median duration of postoperative chest tube indwelling time (5 <i>vs</i>. 5 days, P=0.38), postoperative hospital stays (8 <i>vs</i>. 8 days, P=0.56), operation time (105 <i>vs</i>. 105 min, P=0.88) showed no significant difference between the groups. CT images of Group A patients showed a significantly higher rate of multi-loculation (83 <i>vs</i>. 59, P=0.008) and interlobar effusions (64 <i>vs</i>. 42, P=0.02). There were two postoperative mortalities and four recurrences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Faster and relatively safe and successful clinical outcomes can be achieved with urgent thoracoscopic surgery on patients with complicated parapneumonic effusion despite limited duration of antibiotics coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":"17 1","pages":"357-368"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-1331","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prompt initiation of antibiotics and drainage of infection source is essential in the management of pleural cavity infection. Although surgical drainage is considered a gold standard of treatment for unresolved parapneumonic infection, optimal timing for surgical intervention is still under debate. Thus, we seek to analyze the clinical outcomes of urgent thoracoscopic surgery for complicated parapneumonic effusion regarding the duration of preoperative antibiotic usage.

Methods: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patients who received thoracoscopic surgery for complicated parapneumonic effusion or empyema. Patients were grouped according to the preoperative antibiotic durations and compared. Group A consists of the patients with less than 3 days of preoperative antibiotics usage and Group B consists of those with more than 3 days of preoperative antibiotic coverage. Basic demographics, preoperative chest computed tomography (CT) findings, antibiotics usage, duration until surgery and treatment outcomes were evaluated.

Results: From February 2008 to November 2018, a total of 180 patients underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for pleural drainage or decortication of lung. Group A patients had higher C-reactive protein value (240 vs. 192 mg/L, P=0.003) and were given significantly shorter duration of total antibiotics (9 vs. 14 days, P<0.001). The median duration of postoperative chest tube indwelling time (5 vs. 5 days, P=0.38), postoperative hospital stays (8 vs. 8 days, P=0.56), operation time (105 vs. 105 min, P=0.88) showed no significant difference between the groups. CT images of Group A patients showed a significantly higher rate of multi-loculation (83 vs. 59, P=0.008) and interlobar effusions (64 vs. 42, P=0.02). There were two postoperative mortalities and four recurrences.

Conclusions: Faster and relatively safe and successful clinical outcomes can be achieved with urgent thoracoscopic surgery on patients with complicated parapneumonic effusion despite limited duration of antibiotics coverage.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊胸腔镜手术治疗复杂肺炎旁感染术前短期抗生素应用的临床效果。
背景:在胸膜腔感染的处理中,及时使用抗生素和引流感染源是至关重要的。虽然手术引流被认为是治疗未解决的肺炎旁感染的金标准,但手术干预的最佳时机仍在争论中。因此,我们试图分析急诊胸腔镜手术治疗复杂肺旁积液的临床结果与术前抗生素使用时间的关系。方法:回顾性分析胸腔镜手术治疗合并肺旁积液或脓肿的病例。根据术前抗生素持续时间对患者进行分组比较。A组为术前抗生素使用时间少于3天的患者,B组为术前抗生素使用时间超过3天的患者。评估基本人口统计学、术前胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)结果、抗生素使用、手术前持续时间和治疗结果。结果:2008年2月至2018年11月,共有180例患者接受了电视胸腔镜胸膜引流或肺去皮手术。A组患者c -反应蛋白值较高(240 vs. 192 mg/L, P=0.003),总抗生素使用时间(9 vs. 14 d, P=0.38)、术后住院时间(8 vs. 8 d, P=0.56)、手术时间(105 vs. 105 min, P=0.88)组间差异无统计学意义。A组多定位率(83比59,P=0.008)和叶间积液率(64比42,P=0.02)明显高于A组。术后死亡2例,复发4例。结论:在抗生素覆盖时间有限的情况下,紧急胸腔镜手术治疗复杂性肺旁积液患者可获得更快、相对安全、成功的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of thoracic disease
Journal of thoracic disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with etoposide and platinum-based regimens in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Association between sedation drugs and delirium in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a single-center retrospective study. Endoscopic stenting as salvage therapy for high-risk Boerhaave's syndrome patients. Association between the sedation type and the risk of major oesophageal injury following increased intraoesophageal temperature during radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Aumolertinib combined with targeting ETV4 in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1