{"title":"Widening the diversity of clinical academic staff: an enquiry.","authors":"Sajni Chopra, Charlotte Petrie, Hugh Alberti","doi":"10.1080/14739879.2024.2435611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lack of diversity in academic staff is a national problem. At an interview for academic GP positions at our institution, there were no applicants of ethnic minority background. This does not represent our undergraduate GP teacher workforce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To understand reasons behind the lack of applicant diversity, we held two focus groups of GP teachers at our institution's annual GP teaching fora. These were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six key themes emerged. The major theme attributed the barriers to applying for an academic GP post to individual, institutional and cultural factors. Individual factors included a concern of being under-qualified, out of comfort-zone as well as a lack of awareness of the role. Institutional factors noted insufficient ethnic minority academic role models and inaccessible advertising. Cultural factors illustrate increased challenge, disproportionate stress and paucity of contacts. Our participants discussed their recommendations for change and reflected on their positive experiences.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our research highlights the interplay of factors affecting applicant diversity in academic GP posts. Intersectional theory helps explain the disadvantage, and role modelling is a mechanism to break free. Change is achievable. Interventions can be targeted at both individuals and institutions, to provide momentum for cultural rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46436,"journal":{"name":"Education for Primary Care","volume":" ","pages":"40-46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2024.2435611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Lack of diversity in academic staff is a national problem. At an interview for academic GP positions at our institution, there were no applicants of ethnic minority background. This does not represent our undergraduate GP teacher workforce.
Methods: To understand reasons behind the lack of applicant diversity, we held two focus groups of GP teachers at our institution's annual GP teaching fora. These were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed.
Results: Six key themes emerged. The major theme attributed the barriers to applying for an academic GP post to individual, institutional and cultural factors. Individual factors included a concern of being under-qualified, out of comfort-zone as well as a lack of awareness of the role. Institutional factors noted insufficient ethnic minority academic role models and inaccessible advertising. Cultural factors illustrate increased challenge, disproportionate stress and paucity of contacts. Our participants discussed their recommendations for change and reflected on their positive experiences.
Discussion: Our research highlights the interplay of factors affecting applicant diversity in academic GP posts. Intersectional theory helps explain the disadvantage, and role modelling is a mechanism to break free. Change is achievable. Interventions can be targeted at both individuals and institutions, to provide momentum for cultural rehabilitation.
期刊介绍:
Education for Primary Care aims to reflect the best experience, expertise and innovative ideas in the development of undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing primary care education. The journal is UK based but welcomes contributions from all over the world. Readers will benefit from the broader perspectives on educational activities provided through the contributions of all health professionals, including general practitioners, nurses, midwives, health visitors, community nurses and managers. This sharing of experiences has the potential for enhancing healthcare delivery and for promoting interprofessional working.