Joshua M Pahys, Steven W Hwang, Maureen McGarry, Alejandro Quinonez, Harsh Grewal, Amer F Samdani
{"title":"Incidence and Predictors of Growth Modulation and Overcorrection after Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering.","authors":"Joshua M Pahys, Steven W Hwang, Maureen McGarry, Alejandro Quinonez, Harsh Grewal, Amer F Samdani","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review of a prospectively collected single-center adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) database.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the incidence and predictors of growth modulation and overcorrection after vertebral body tethering (VBT) in AIS.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Little data exists regarding which AIS patients will exhibit growth modulation and/or overcorrection after VBT compared to those whose curve correction will remain unchanged (no modulation).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 279 patients with AIS with a minimum 2-year follow-up (range 2-10 years) were included. There were 262 thoracic and 65 thoracolumbar VBT surgeries performed. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify the potential clinical/radiographic predictive factors for growth modulation and overcorrection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with growth modulation and those with no modulation after thoracic VBT were significantly more immature (younger, premenarchal, lower Sanders score/Risser grade, open triradiate cartilage [TRC]) and physically smaller (lower height, weight, and body mass index [BMI]; P<0.02). Patients with growth modulation vs. no modulation after thoracolumbar VBT had lower preoperative Sanders score, weight, and BMI (P<0.04). Preoperative and first-erect thoracic and lumbar curve magnitudes did not affect growth modulation vs. no modulation. Patients with thoracic overcorrection were physically smaller (lower height/weight/BMI) and had lower preoperative and first-erect thoracic curves than patients with growth modulation without overcorrection (P<0.04). Patients with thoracolumbar overcorrection had open-TRC and lower first-erect lumbar curves than patients with growth modulation without overcorrection (P<0.04). Open-TRC (odds ratio: 6.8, P<0.001) and lower BMI (P<0.001) were the only significant predictive factors for thoracic growth modulation in multivariate analysis; none were identified for thoracolumbar growth modulation. Sixty-four percent of patients with overcorrection required revision surgery versus 18% of those with no modulation (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AIS patients with open-TRC and lower BMI had a statistically higher rate of thoracic growth modulation and overcorrection after VBT in multivariate analysis. Preoperative and first-erect curve magnitudes did not affect the incidence of growth modulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005306","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected single-center adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) database.
Objective: To evaluate the incidence and predictors of growth modulation and overcorrection after vertebral body tethering (VBT) in AIS.
Background: Little data exists regarding which AIS patients will exhibit growth modulation and/or overcorrection after VBT compared to those whose curve correction will remain unchanged (no modulation).
Materials and methods: A total of 279 patients with AIS with a minimum 2-year follow-up (range 2-10 years) were included. There were 262 thoracic and 65 thoracolumbar VBT surgeries performed. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify the potential clinical/radiographic predictive factors for growth modulation and overcorrection.
Results: Patients with growth modulation and those with no modulation after thoracic VBT were significantly more immature (younger, premenarchal, lower Sanders score/Risser grade, open triradiate cartilage [TRC]) and physically smaller (lower height, weight, and body mass index [BMI]; P<0.02). Patients with growth modulation vs. no modulation after thoracolumbar VBT had lower preoperative Sanders score, weight, and BMI (P<0.04). Preoperative and first-erect thoracic and lumbar curve magnitudes did not affect growth modulation vs. no modulation. Patients with thoracic overcorrection were physically smaller (lower height/weight/BMI) and had lower preoperative and first-erect thoracic curves than patients with growth modulation without overcorrection (P<0.04). Patients with thoracolumbar overcorrection had open-TRC and lower first-erect lumbar curves than patients with growth modulation without overcorrection (P<0.04). Open-TRC (odds ratio: 6.8, P<0.001) and lower BMI (P<0.001) were the only significant predictive factors for thoracic growth modulation in multivariate analysis; none were identified for thoracolumbar growth modulation. Sixty-four percent of patients with overcorrection required revision surgery versus 18% of those with no modulation (P<0.001).
Conclusion: AIS patients with open-TRC and lower BMI had a statistically higher rate of thoracic growth modulation and overcorrection after VBT in multivariate analysis. Preoperative and first-erect curve magnitudes did not affect the incidence of growth modulation.
期刊介绍:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store.
Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.