Lumbar Stiffness After Pan-Lumbar Arthrodesis Adversely Affects Patient-Reported Outcomes But does not Compromise Patient Satisfaction in Adult Spinal Deformity.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005298
Se-Jun Park, Jin-Sung Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Minwook Kang, Kyunghun Jung, Yun-Mi Lim, Hyun-Jun Kim, Chong-Suh Lee
{"title":"Lumbar Stiffness After Pan-Lumbar Arthrodesis Adversely Affects Patient-Reported Outcomes But does not Compromise Patient Satisfaction in Adult Spinal Deformity.","authors":"Se-Jun Park, Jin-Sung Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Minwook Kang, Kyunghun Jung, Yun-Mi Lim, Hyun-Jun Kim, Chong-Suh Lee","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the effect of lumbar stiffness on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and satisfaction in patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Lumbar stiffness following pan-lumbar arthrodesis may impair the activities of daily living. However, the effect lumbar stiffness on the PROs and patient satisfaction in Asian populations remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent ≥ 5-level fusion including the sacrum were selected for the study. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were evaluated at postoperative 2 years. Lumbar stiffness was evaluated using the modified lumbar stiffness disability index (M-LSDI), which comprises 10 questionnaires with higher scores indicating greater disability. The PRO measures included the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Socitey-22 (SRS-22), Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical component score (PCS), and SF-36 mental component score (MCS). Patients were divided into two groups based on their 2-year SRS-22 satisfaction scores: high satisfaction (≥ 4.0) and low satisfaction (< 4.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 194 patients were included in the study (female, 87.6%; mean age, 69.1 years; and mean fusion length, 8.0). All PROs significantly improved after surgery with regard to VAS, ODI, SRS-22, and SF-36. The M-LSDI score was worsened significantly from 22.3 preoperatively to 26.6 postoperatively. Correlation analysis showed that the 2-year M-LSDI scores were negatively associated PRO measures, including VAS, ODI, SRS-22, SF-36 PCS, and SF-36 MCS. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the 2-year M-LSDI score did not affect patient satisfaction status; the 2-year SRS-22 score was an independent factor for high satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After surgery, significant improvements were observed in all RROs. Although the postoperative increase in M-LSDI scores were significant, the changes were small. The degree of lumbar stiffness negatively influenced all PRO measures but did not affect patient satisfaction at 2 years postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005298","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective study.

Objectives: To investigate the effect of lumbar stiffness on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and satisfaction in patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

Summary of background data: Lumbar stiffness following pan-lumbar arthrodesis may impair the activities of daily living. However, the effect lumbar stiffness on the PROs and patient satisfaction in Asian populations remains unclear.

Methods: Patients who underwent ≥ 5-level fusion including the sacrum were selected for the study. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were evaluated at postoperative 2 years. Lumbar stiffness was evaluated using the modified lumbar stiffness disability index (M-LSDI), which comprises 10 questionnaires with higher scores indicating greater disability. The PRO measures included the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Socitey-22 (SRS-22), Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical component score (PCS), and SF-36 mental component score (MCS). Patients were divided into two groups based on their 2-year SRS-22 satisfaction scores: high satisfaction (≥ 4.0) and low satisfaction (< 4.0).

Results: A total of 194 patients were included in the study (female, 87.6%; mean age, 69.1 years; and mean fusion length, 8.0). All PROs significantly improved after surgery with regard to VAS, ODI, SRS-22, and SF-36. The M-LSDI score was worsened significantly from 22.3 preoperatively to 26.6 postoperatively. Correlation analysis showed that the 2-year M-LSDI scores were negatively associated PRO measures, including VAS, ODI, SRS-22, SF-36 PCS, and SF-36 MCS. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the 2-year M-LSDI score did not affect patient satisfaction status; the 2-year SRS-22 score was an independent factor for high satisfaction.

Conclusions: After surgery, significant improvements were observed in all RROs. Although the postoperative increase in M-LSDI scores were significant, the changes were small. The degree of lumbar stiffness negatively influenced all PRO measures but did not affect patient satisfaction at 2 years postoperatively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泛腰椎关节融合术后腰椎僵硬对患者报告的结果有不利影响,但不影响成人脊柱畸形患者的满意度。
研究设计:回顾性研究。目的:探讨腰椎僵硬对成人脊柱畸形(ASD)手术患者报告预后(PROs)和满意度的影响。背景资料总结:泛腰椎关节融合术后腰椎僵硬可能影响日常生活活动。然而,在亚洲人群中,腰椎僵硬对PROs和患者满意度的影响尚不清楚。方法:选择包括骶骨在内的≥5节段融合的患者进行研究。术后2年评估影像学和临床结果。腰椎僵硬度采用改良腰椎僵硬失能指数(M-LSDI)进行评估,该指数由10份问卷组成,得分越高,失能程度越高。PRO测量包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)、脊柱侧凸研究协会-22 (SRS-22)、短表-36 (SF-36)身体成分评分(PCS)和SF-36精神成分评分(MCS)。根据2年SRS-22满意度分为高满意度组(≥4.0)和低满意度组(< 4.0)。结果:共纳入194例患者(女性占87.6%;平均年龄69.1岁;平均聚变长度为8.0)。术后VAS、ODI、SRS-22、SF-36评分均有显著改善。M-LSDI评分由术前的22.3分明显恶化至术后的26.6分。相关分析显示,2年M-LSDI评分与VAS、ODI、SRS-22、sf - 36pcs、sf - 36mcs等PRO指标呈负相关。多因素回归分析显示,2年M-LSDI评分对患者满意度无影响;2年SRS-22评分是高满意度的独立因素。结论:手术后,所有RROs均有显著改善。虽然术后M-LSDI评分增加明显,但变化很小。腰椎僵硬程度对所有PRO测量都有负面影响,但对术后2年患者满意度没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Inpatient and Outpatient Palliative Care Utilization Rates of Patients With Spine Metastases. Breaking Down Instability: The Associations Between Muscle Health, Facet Joint Morphology, Spinopelvic Alignment, and Stability Status in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. Posterior Spinal Fusion With Rib Resection Allows for Improved Deformity Correction as Well as Patient Satisfaction. The Relationship of CT Hounsfield Units at UIV+1 and UIV+2 Relative to UIV Predicts Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Patients With Long Spinal Constructs. Preoperative Predictors of Poor Outcomes Following Lumbar Discectomy. A Study Based on the National Finspine Registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1