Real-world datasets for the International Registry for Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias (InRAD) and other registries: An international consensus.
Robert Perneczky, David Darby, Giovanni B Frisoni, Robert Hyde, Takeshi Iwatsubo, Catherine J Mummery, Kee Hyung Park, Johan van Beek, Wiesje M van der Flier, Frank Jessen
{"title":"Real-world datasets for the International Registry for Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias (InRAD) and other registries: An international consensus.","authors":"Robert Perneczky, David Darby, Giovanni B Frisoni, Robert Hyde, Takeshi Iwatsubo, Catherine J Mummery, Kee Hyung Park, Johan van Beek, Wiesje M van der Flier, Frank Jessen","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD) registries operate at local or national levels without standardization or comprehensive real-world data (RWD) collection. This initiative sought to achieve consensus among experts on priority outcomes and measures for clinical practice in caring for patients with symptomatic AD, particularly in the mild cognitive impairment and mild to moderate dementia stages.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary aim was to define a minimum dataset (MDS) and extended dataset (EDS) to collect RWD in the new International Registry for AD and Other Dementias (InRAD) and other AD registries. The MDS and EDS focus on informing routine clinical practice, covering relevant comorbidities and safety, and are designed to be easily integrated into existing data capture systems.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>An international steering committee (ISC) of AD clinician experts lead the initiative. The first drafts of the MDS and EDS were developed based on a previous global inter-societal Delphi consensus on outcome measures for AD. Based on the ISC discussions, a survey was devised and sent to a wider stakeholder group. The ISC discussed the survey results, resulting in a consensus MDS and EDS covering: patient profile and demographics; lifestyle and anthropometrics; co-morbidities and diagnostics; imaging; treatment; clinical characterization; safety; discontinuation; laboratory tests; patient and care partner outcomes; and interface functionality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By learning from successful examples in other clinical areas, addressing current limitations, and proactively enhancing data quality and analytical rigor, the InRAD registry will be a foundation to contribute to improving patient care and outcomes in neurodegenerative diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"100096"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Many dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD) registries operate at local or national levels without standardization or comprehensive real-world data (RWD) collection. This initiative sought to achieve consensus among experts on priority outcomes and measures for clinical practice in caring for patients with symptomatic AD, particularly in the mild cognitive impairment and mild to moderate dementia stages.
Objective: The primary aim was to define a minimum dataset (MDS) and extended dataset (EDS) to collect RWD in the new International Registry for AD and Other Dementias (InRAD) and other AD registries. The MDS and EDS focus on informing routine clinical practice, covering relevant comorbidities and safety, and are designed to be easily integrated into existing data capture systems.
Methods and results: An international steering committee (ISC) of AD clinician experts lead the initiative. The first drafts of the MDS and EDS were developed based on a previous global inter-societal Delphi consensus on outcome measures for AD. Based on the ISC discussions, a survey was devised and sent to a wider stakeholder group. The ISC discussed the survey results, resulting in a consensus MDS and EDS covering: patient profile and demographics; lifestyle and anthropometrics; co-morbidities and diagnostics; imaging; treatment; clinical characterization; safety; discontinuation; laboratory tests; patient and care partner outcomes; and interface functionality.
Conclusion: By learning from successful examples in other clinical areas, addressing current limitations, and proactively enhancing data quality and analytical rigor, the InRAD registry will be a foundation to contribute to improving patient care and outcomes in neurodegenerative diseases.
期刊介绍:
The JPAD Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including: neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes.JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.We hope that JPAD with your contribution will play a role in the development of Alzheimer prevention.