Efficacy of cystectomy in single-site oligometastatic bladder cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) study of 1,381 patients.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q4 ANDROLOGY Translational andrology and urology Pub Date : 2025-01-31 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.21037/tau-24-586
Jiaxiang Ji, Chin-Hui Lai, Runfeng Ni, Mingrui Wang, Haopu Hu, Xiaolong Bian, Cong Tian, Chenlong Wang, Tao Xu, Hao Hu
{"title":"Efficacy of cystectomy in single-site oligometastatic bladder cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) study of 1,381 patients.","authors":"Jiaxiang Ji, Chin-Hui Lai, Runfeng Ni, Mingrui Wang, Haopu Hu, Xiaolong Bian, Cong Tian, Chenlong Wang, Tao Xu, Hao Hu","doi":"10.21037/tau-24-586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment paradigm of metastatic bladder cancer has remained largely unchanged for decades and the prognosis is extremely poor. This study aimed to evaluate the role of cystectomy in patients with single-site oligometastatic bladder cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with single-site distant metastasis at the time of bladder cancer diagnosis from 2010-2017 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Cohorts were defined by target organ [bone, brain, lung, liver, distant lymph nodes (DLNs)] and then stratified by local treatment received [no surgery, transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and cystectomy]. Patients not receiving chemotherapy were excluded. Two-year cancer specific survival (CSS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, adjusting for demographic, clinical and pathologic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,381 patients met study criteria. K-M analysis indicated that cystectomy was associated with improved survival when compared to no surgery in patients with bone and DLNs metastasis. In multivariable analysis, patients with bone [hazard ratio (HR) =0.58; P=0.03] or DLNs (HR =0.51; P=0.005) metastasis who underwent cystectomy had a significant survival advantage over those receiving systemic therapy only. And patients with liver (HR =0.40; P=0.07) and lung (HR =0.84; P=0.58) who underwent cystectomy failed to exhibit superior survival than those receiving chemotherapy only. Patients with brain metastasis were omitted in subgroup analysis due to the limit of small sample size (n=20). In addition, the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors improved the survival of patients, with HR of 0.78, indicating the reduction of death risk by 22%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cystectomy in the setting of multimodality protocols may prolong survival in bladder cancer patients with single-site metastasis of the bone and DLNs. It should be considered in a multidisciplinary setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":23270,"journal":{"name":"Translational andrology and urology","volume":"14 1","pages":"81-90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational andrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-24-586","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The treatment paradigm of metastatic bladder cancer has remained largely unchanged for decades and the prognosis is extremely poor. This study aimed to evaluate the role of cystectomy in patients with single-site oligometastatic bladder cancer.

Methods: Patients with single-site distant metastasis at the time of bladder cancer diagnosis from 2010-2017 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Cohorts were defined by target organ [bone, brain, lung, liver, distant lymph nodes (DLNs)] and then stratified by local treatment received [no surgery, transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and cystectomy]. Patients not receiving chemotherapy were excluded. Two-year cancer specific survival (CSS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, adjusting for demographic, clinical and pathologic factors.

Results: A total of 1,381 patients met study criteria. K-M analysis indicated that cystectomy was associated with improved survival when compared to no surgery in patients with bone and DLNs metastasis. In multivariable analysis, patients with bone [hazard ratio (HR) =0.58; P=0.03] or DLNs (HR =0.51; P=0.005) metastasis who underwent cystectomy had a significant survival advantage over those receiving systemic therapy only. And patients with liver (HR =0.40; P=0.07) and lung (HR =0.84; P=0.58) who underwent cystectomy failed to exhibit superior survival than those receiving chemotherapy only. Patients with brain metastasis were omitted in subgroup analysis due to the limit of small sample size (n=20). In addition, the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors improved the survival of patients, with HR of 0.78, indicating the reduction of death risk by 22%.

Conclusions: Cystectomy in the setting of multimodality protocols may prolong survival in bladder cancer patients with single-site metastasis of the bone and DLNs. It should be considered in a multidisciplinary setting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膀胱切除术治疗单部位少转移膀胱癌的疗效:一项1381例患者的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)研究
背景:转移性膀胱癌的治疗模式几十年来基本保持不变,预后极差。本研究旨在评估膀胱切除术在单部位少转移膀胱癌患者中的作用。方法:从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中筛选2010-2017年膀胱癌诊断时发生单部位远处转移的患者。按靶器官[骨、脑、肺、肝、远端淋巴结(dln)]定义队列,然后按局部治疗[不手术、经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(turt)和膀胱切除术]分层。未接受化疗的患者被排除在外。采用Kaplan-Meier (K-M)分析和多变量Cox比例风险分析评估两年癌症特异性生存率(CSS),并对人口统计学、临床和病理因素进行调整。结果:共有1381例患者符合研究标准。K-M分析表明,与不进行骨和dln转移的患者相比,膀胱切除术与生存率提高有关。在多变量分析中,骨[危险比(HR) =0.58;P=0.03]或DLNs (HR =0.51;P=0.005),接受膀胱切除术的转移患者比仅接受全身治疗的转移患者有显著的生存优势。肝脏患者(HR =0.40;P=0.07)和肺(HR =0.84;P=0.58)行膀胱切除术的患者生存率低于仅接受化疗的患者。由于样本量有限(n=20),在亚组分析中忽略脑转移患者。此外,免疫检查点抑制剂的出现提高了患者的生存率,HR为0.78,表明死亡风险降低了22%。结论:多模式膀胱切除术可延长伴有骨和dln单部位转移的膀胱癌患者的生存期。应在多学科背景下加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ranslational Andrology and Urology (Print ISSN 2223-4683; Online ISSN 2223-4691; Transl Androl Urol; TAU) is an open access, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal (quarterly published from Mar.2012 - Dec. 2014). The main focus of the journal is to describe new findings in the field of translational research of Andrology and Urology, provides current and practical information on basic research and clinical investigations of Andrology and Urology. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, molecular study, pathology, biology and technical advances related to andrology and urology. Topics cover range from evaluation, prevention, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, rehabilitation and future challenges to urology and andrology. Contributions pertinent to urology and andrology are also included from related fields such as public health, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.
期刊最新文献
Mixed epithelial and stromal tumor of the kidney: a case series of clinical diversity in atypical presentations. METS-VF outperforms traditional adiposity indices in predicting overactive bladder risk: a NHANES-based cross-sectional study. Overview of tumor-resident intratumoral microbiota in human bladder cancer. Modified three-arm port configuration for single-position, single-docking robotic nephroureterectomy: perioperative and oncological outcomes. Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio in relation to erectile dysfunction: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1