Performance Comparison of Liquid Chromatography and Paper Spray Ionization with Mass Spectrometry for Measuring Kinase Inhibitors in Human Plasma.

IF 3.7 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science Pub Date : 2025-01-16 eCollection Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1021/acsptsci.4c00646
Richard G Lahr, Makenzie Meyer, Leah Nelson, Lisa A Kottschade, Paul J Jannetto, Yifei K Yang
{"title":"Performance Comparison of Liquid Chromatography and Paper Spray Ionization with Mass Spectrometry for Measuring Kinase Inhibitors in Human Plasma.","authors":"Richard G Lahr, Makenzie Meyer, Leah Nelson, Lisa A Kottschade, Paul J Jannetto, Yifei K Yang","doi":"10.1021/acsptsci.4c00646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Kinase inhibitors are small-molecule drugs designed to target oncogenic mutations in cancer treatment. Although less toxic than conventional chemotherapy drugs, they can cause severe adverse effects in some patients, resulting in dose reduction and cessation. To evaluate if therapeutic drug monitoring of kinase inhibitors and their metabolites can improve toxicity assessment in patients, we developed and evaluated the analytical performance of two parallel methods utilizing liquid chromatography (LC) and paper spray (PS) ionization coupled with a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (MS) for the measurement of dabrafenib, its major metabolite OH-dabrafenib, and trametinib in patient plasma samples. The PS-MS method yielded a faster sample analysis time (2 min) compared to the LC separation (9 min). The two methods shared the same analytical measurement range (AMR) for dabrafenib and OH-dabrafenib (10-3500 and 10-1250 ng/mL), but the AMR differed for trametinib (LC-MS: 0.5-50 ng/mL; PS-MS: 5.0-50 ng/mL). The imprecision across their respective AMR was 1.3-6.5% (dabrafenib), 3.0-9.7% (OH-dabrafenib), and 1.3-5.1% (trametinib) for the LC-MS method and 3.8-6.7% (dabrafenib), 4.0-8.9% (OH-dabrafenib), and 3.2-9.9% (trametinib) for the PS-MS method. Using authentic patient samples, the quantification results were comparable between the two methods: dabrafenib (correlation coefficient <i>r</i> = 0.9977), OH-dabrafenib (<i>r</i> = 0.885), and trametinib (<i>r</i> = 0.9807). Nonetheless, the PS-MS method displayed significantly higher variations compared with the LC-MS method. Based on the LC-MS method, we were able to profile the concentrations and metabolism patterns of dabrafenib and trametinib in patients who were receiving the drugs for BRAF V600 mutation-driven malignancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":36426,"journal":{"name":"ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science","volume":"8 2","pages":"557-565"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834250/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsptsci.4c00646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kinase inhibitors are small-molecule drugs designed to target oncogenic mutations in cancer treatment. Although less toxic than conventional chemotherapy drugs, they can cause severe adverse effects in some patients, resulting in dose reduction and cessation. To evaluate if therapeutic drug monitoring of kinase inhibitors and their metabolites can improve toxicity assessment in patients, we developed and evaluated the analytical performance of two parallel methods utilizing liquid chromatography (LC) and paper spray (PS) ionization coupled with a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (MS) for the measurement of dabrafenib, its major metabolite OH-dabrafenib, and trametinib in patient plasma samples. The PS-MS method yielded a faster sample analysis time (2 min) compared to the LC separation (9 min). The two methods shared the same analytical measurement range (AMR) for dabrafenib and OH-dabrafenib (10-3500 and 10-1250 ng/mL), but the AMR differed for trametinib (LC-MS: 0.5-50 ng/mL; PS-MS: 5.0-50 ng/mL). The imprecision across their respective AMR was 1.3-6.5% (dabrafenib), 3.0-9.7% (OH-dabrafenib), and 1.3-5.1% (trametinib) for the LC-MS method and 3.8-6.7% (dabrafenib), 4.0-8.9% (OH-dabrafenib), and 3.2-9.9% (trametinib) for the PS-MS method. Using authentic patient samples, the quantification results were comparable between the two methods: dabrafenib (correlation coefficient r = 0.9977), OH-dabrafenib (r = 0.885), and trametinib (r = 0.9807). Nonetheless, the PS-MS method displayed significantly higher variations compared with the LC-MS method. Based on the LC-MS method, we were able to profile the concentrations and metabolism patterns of dabrafenib and trametinib in patients who were receiving the drugs for BRAF V600 mutation-driven malignancies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
液相色谱和纸喷雾电离质谱法测定人血浆中激酶抑制剂的性能比较。
激酶抑制剂是一种小分子药物,旨在针对癌症治疗中的致癌突变。虽然它们的毒性比传统化疗药物小,但对一些患者会造成严重的不良反应,导致剂量减少和停药。为了评估治疗药物监测激酶抑制剂及其代谢物是否可以改善患者的毒性评估,我们开发并评估了两种平行方法的分析性能,利用液相色谱(LC)和纸喷雾(PS)电离耦合三重四极杆质谱仪(MS)来测量患者血浆样品中的dabrafenib,其主要代谢物o -dabrafenib和trametinib。与LC分离(9 min)相比,PS-MS方法的样品分析时间(2 min)更快。两种方法对达非尼和oh -达非尼具有相同的分析测量范围(AMR)(10-3500和10-1250 ng/mL),但曲美替尼的AMR不同(LC-MS: 0.5-50 ng/mL;PS-MS: 5.0-50 ng/mL)。LC-MS法AMR的不精确性分别为1.3-6.5% (dabrafenib)、3.0-9.7% (ohdabrafenib)和1.3-5.1% (trametinib), PS-MS法为3.8-6.7% (dabrafenib)、4.0-8.9% (ohdabrafenib)和3.2-9.9% (trametinib)。使用真实患者样本,达非尼(相关系数r = 0.9977)、oh -达非尼(相关系数r = 0.885)和曲美替尼(相关系数r = 0.9807)两种方法的定量结果具有可比性。然而,与LC-MS方法相比,PS-MS方法显示出明显更高的变化。基于LC-MS方法,我们能够在接受BRAF V600突变驱动恶性肿瘤药物治疗的患者中分析dabrafenib和trametinib的浓度和代谢模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science
ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science publishes high quality, innovative, and impactful research across the broad spectrum of biological sciences, covering basic and molecular sciences through to translational preclinical studies. Clinical studies that address novel mechanisms of action, and methodological papers that provide innovation, and advance translation, will also be considered. We give priority to studies that fully integrate basic pharmacological and/or biochemical findings into physiological processes that have translational potential in a broad range of biomedical disciplines. Therefore, studies that employ a complementary blend of in vitro and in vivo systems are of particular interest to the journal. Nonetheless, all innovative and impactful research that has an articulated translational relevance will be considered. ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science does not publish research on biological extracts that have unknown concentration or unknown chemical composition. Authors are encouraged to use the pre-submission inquiry mechanism to ensure relevance and appropriateness of research.
期刊最新文献
Issue Publication Information Issue Editorial Masthead Correction to “Newly Synthesized Indolylacetic Derivatives Reduce Tumor Necrosis Factor-Mediated Neuroinflammation and Prolong Survival in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Mice” The Neuroprotective Effects of Agomelatine in a 3-Nitropropionic Acid-Induced Rat Model of Huntington’s Disease via Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF)/tropomyosin-Related Kinase Receptor Type B (TrKB)/Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase (PI3K)/Protein Kinase B (AKT) Activation and Rho-Associated Protein Kinase 1 (ROCK1) Pathway Inhibition Influence of Lipid Composition on Nonspecific Interactions of Serotonin with Model Membranes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1