Intervention challenges experienced in physiotherapy and occupational therapy with workers' pain and disability representations: a mixed methods study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1007/s10926-025-10272-9
Patricia Godbout, Marie-France Coutu, Marie-José Durand
{"title":"Intervention challenges experienced in physiotherapy and occupational therapy with workers' pain and disability representations: a mixed methods study.","authors":"Patricia Godbout, Marie-France Coutu, Marie-José Durand","doi":"10.1007/s10926-025-10272-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study objectives were to (1) identify prevalent unhelpful worker-held pain and disability representations and (2) explore clinicians' intervention challenges with these representations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An explanatory sequential mixed methods design was used (quan → QUAL). Secondary analysis of a database was performed first. The database included the scores obtained by 297 sick-listed workers with musculoskeletal disorders on the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire for Work Disability. Descriptive statistics identified the most prevalent unhelpful worker-held representations. Quantitative results were used to develop an interview guide. Semi-structured interviews explored the physiotherapy professionals' (n = 8) and occupational therapists' (n = 6) intervention challenges with workers' pain and disability representations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The secondary data analysis showed that perceptions of severe consequences, unpredictable symptoms, and negative emotions were the most prevalent unhelpful worker-held representations. The interviews identified clinicians' key intervention challenges as two specific pain-and-disability representation patterns. The first depicted workers' perceptions of unpredictable and uncontrollable pain, perceptions that generate negative emotions. The clinicians associated this pattern with workers' sense of helplessness. The second pattern involved workers' firm beliefs in a biomedical cause, leading to their perceptions of low levels of treatment and personal pain control. According to clinicians, this pattern led to workers' resistance to active rehabilitation. The clinicians regarded both patterns as hindering worker engagement in rehabilitation treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The clinicians' key intervention challenges were two pain-and-disability representation patterns, which included or not, prevalent unhelpful worker-held representations. The results underscore the need to develop a transdisciplinary intervention for work rehabilitation clinicians that takes pain and disability representations into account.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-025-10272-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The study objectives were to (1) identify prevalent unhelpful worker-held pain and disability representations and (2) explore clinicians' intervention challenges with these representations.

Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed methods design was used (quan → QUAL). Secondary analysis of a database was performed first. The database included the scores obtained by 297 sick-listed workers with musculoskeletal disorders on the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire for Work Disability. Descriptive statistics identified the most prevalent unhelpful worker-held representations. Quantitative results were used to develop an interview guide. Semi-structured interviews explored the physiotherapy professionals' (n = 8) and occupational therapists' (n = 6) intervention challenges with workers' pain and disability representations.

Results: The secondary data analysis showed that perceptions of severe consequences, unpredictable symptoms, and negative emotions were the most prevalent unhelpful worker-held representations. The interviews identified clinicians' key intervention challenges as two specific pain-and-disability representation patterns. The first depicted workers' perceptions of unpredictable and uncontrollable pain, perceptions that generate negative emotions. The clinicians associated this pattern with workers' sense of helplessness. The second pattern involved workers' firm beliefs in a biomedical cause, leading to their perceptions of low levels of treatment and personal pain control. According to clinicians, this pattern led to workers' resistance to active rehabilitation. The clinicians regarded both patterns as hindering worker engagement in rehabilitation treatment.

Conclusion: The clinicians' key intervention challenges were two pain-and-disability representation patterns, which included or not, prevalent unhelpful worker-held representations. The results underscore the need to develop a transdisciplinary intervention for work rehabilitation clinicians that takes pain and disability representations into account.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on the rehabilitation, reintegration, and prevention of disability in workers. The journal offers investigations involving original data collection and research synthesis (i.e., scoping reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses). Papers derive from a broad array of fields including rehabilitation medicine, physical and occupational therapy, health psychology and psychiatry, orthopedics, oncology, occupational and insurance medicine, neurology, social work, ergonomics, biomedical engineering, health economics, rehabilitation engineering, business administration and management, and law.  A single interdisciplinary source for information on work disability rehabilitation, the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation helps to advance the scientific understanding, management, and prevention of work disability.
期刊最新文献
Conceptualizing Stigma in the Injured Worker Literature: A Scoping Review. Assisting Employers of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) to Support Employees on Long-Term Sick-Leave: Development of a Web-Based SME Tool Using Intervention Mapping. Occupational Health Nurses' Perceptions in Work Ability Risk Management and Analysis. Organizational Practices and Their Outcomes for Employees with Disabilities: A Review and Synthesis of Quantitative Studies. Evaluating Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation Among Workers Admitted to a Posttraumatic Stress Injury Rehabilitation Program.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1