Flushed with success: how participation in social schemes influences toilet adoption in rural India.

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Journal of Biosocial Science Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1017/S0021932025000057
Malvika Tyagi, Deepak Kumar, Malik Altaf Hussain, Md Tajuddin Khan
{"title":"Flushed with success: how participation in social schemes influences toilet adoption in rural India.","authors":"Malvika Tyagi, Deepak Kumar, Malik Altaf Hussain, Md Tajuddin Khan","doi":"10.1017/S0021932025000057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite significant public health investments, rural India's sanitation challenges persist, raising questions about effective intervention strategies. This study investigates the influence of participation in social schemes on household sanitation behaviours, specifically toilet adoption and soap usage. Using panel data from the India Human Development Survey (2004-05 and 2011-12), a Linear Probability Model with Propensity Score Matching is employed to address potential selection bias. Results indicate that scheme participation increases toilet adoption by 45.5% and soap usage by 13.8%, with effects varying by socio-economic status, demographic characteristics, and local infrastructure. Particularly strong impacts are observed among historically disadvantaged communities, suggesting that social schemes can effectively reduce sanitation inequities. The spillover effect on soap usage indicates these interventions may catalyse broader hygiene behaviour changes. The findings highlight the value of social schemes in improving rural sanitation practices and offer insights for future programme design.</p>","PeriodicalId":47742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biosocial Science","volume":" ","pages":"315-329"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biosocial Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932025000057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite significant public health investments, rural India's sanitation challenges persist, raising questions about effective intervention strategies. This study investigates the influence of participation in social schemes on household sanitation behaviours, specifically toilet adoption and soap usage. Using panel data from the India Human Development Survey (2004-05 and 2011-12), a Linear Probability Model with Propensity Score Matching is employed to address potential selection bias. Results indicate that scheme participation increases toilet adoption by 45.5% and soap usage by 13.8%, with effects varying by socio-economic status, demographic characteristics, and local infrastructure. Particularly strong impacts are observed among historically disadvantaged communities, suggesting that social schemes can effectively reduce sanitation inequities. The spillover effect on soap usage indicates these interventions may catalyse broader hygiene behaviour changes. The findings highlight the value of social schemes in improving rural sanitation practices and offer insights for future programme design.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成功:参与社会计划如何影响印度农村厕所的采用。
尽管有大量的公共卫生投资,但印度农村的卫生挑战仍然存在,这引发了对有效干预战略的质疑。本研究调查了参与社会计划对家庭卫生行为的影响,特别是厕所的采用和肥皂的使用。使用来自印度人类发展调查(2004-05和2011-12)的面板数据,采用倾向得分匹配的线性概率模型来解决潜在的选择偏差。结果表明,参与该计划使厕所使用率提高了45.5%,肥皂使用率提高了13.8%,其效果因社会经济地位、人口特征和当地基础设施而异。在历史上处于不利地位的社区中观察到特别强烈的影响,这表明社会计划可以有效地减少卫生不平等。对肥皂使用的溢出效应表明,这些干预措施可能促进更广泛的卫生行为改变。这些发现突出了社会计划在改善农村卫生实践方面的价值,并为未来的规划设计提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Journal of Biosocial Science is a leading interdisciplinary and international journal in the field of biosocial science, the common ground between biology and sociology. It acts as an essential reference guide for all biological and social scientists working in these interdisciplinary areas, including social and biological aspects of reproduction and its control, gerontology, ecology, genetics, applied psychology, sociology, education, criminology, demography, health and epidemiology. Publishing original research papers, short reports, reviews, lectures and book reviews, the journal also includes a Debate section that encourages readers" comments on specific articles, with subsequent response from the original author.
期刊最新文献
The lived experiences of familial mental illness stigma among persons living with mental illnesses. Adverse self-rated health transition among older adults in India: a retrospective life course approach. Ebola in the rear-view mirror: how epidemic pasts shaped Sierra Leone's preparedness and response to Covid-19. Biosocial disparities in substance use among sexual-minority veterans with depression: national evidence on the role of depression-related clinical contact and medication use. 'It all depends on your faith': Spiritual illnesses and traditional healing in rural Limpopo Province, South Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1