Exploring Working Relationships Between Clinical Nurse Specialists and Clinical Nurse Leaders to Better Understand Opportunities for Improvement: A Phenomenological Qualitative Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Nursing Administration Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1097/NNA.0000000000001551
Jackeline Iseler, Mary Luciani, Bridget Graham
{"title":"Exploring Working Relationships Between Clinical Nurse Specialists and Clinical Nurse Leaders to Better Understand Opportunities for Improvement: A Phenomenological Qualitative Study.","authors":"Jackeline Iseler, Mary Luciani, Bridget Graham","doi":"10.1097/NNA.0000000000001551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this descriptive qualitative study was to describe the experiences between clinical nurse specialists (CNS) and clinical nurse leaders (CNLs) at a Midwestern hospital.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical nurse specialists and CNLs are both nurses with advanced degrees yet differing specialties and responsibilities. Both focus on improving nursing and patient care but face challenges such as role definition and resource constraints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of 8 CNSs and 9 CNLs from a Midwestern hospital were recruited to participate in focus groups to explore their experiences working together within the same organization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six themes were identified from the interviews: 1) organizational factors; 2) role identity and function; 3) communication practices and challenges; 4) value and visibility; 5) challenges and barriers; and 6) strategies and solutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is important for administrative leadership to have a clear understanding of the scopes and unique significant contributions that the CNS and CNL each bring to healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":50108,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Administration","volume":"55 3","pages":"E12-E16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Administration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000001551","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this descriptive qualitative study was to describe the experiences between clinical nurse specialists (CNS) and clinical nurse leaders (CNLs) at a Midwestern hospital.

Background: Clinical nurse specialists and CNLs are both nurses with advanced degrees yet differing specialties and responsibilities. Both focus on improving nursing and patient care but face challenges such as role definition and resource constraints.

Methods: A sample of 8 CNSs and 9 CNLs from a Midwestern hospital were recruited to participate in focus groups to explore their experiences working together within the same organization.

Results: Six themes were identified from the interviews: 1) organizational factors; 2) role identity and function; 3) communication practices and challenges; 4) value and visibility; 5) challenges and barriers; and 6) strategies and solutions.

Conclusions: It is important for administrative leadership to have a clear understanding of the scopes and unique significant contributions that the CNS and CNL each bring to healthcare.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索临床专科护士与临床护士领导之间的工作关系,更好地了解改进机会:现象学定性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​JONA™ is the authoritative source of information on developments and advances in patient care leadership. Content is geared to nurse executives, directors of nursing, and nurse managers in hospital, community health, and ambulatory care environments. Practical, innovative, and solution-oriented articles provide the tools and data needed to excel in executive practice in changing healthcare systems: leadership development; human, material, and financial resource management and relationships; systems, business, and financial strategies. All articles are peer-reviewed, selected and developed with the guidance of a distinguished group of editorial advisors.
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Measuring Professional Governance: The Swedish Version of the Verran Professional Governance Scale©. A Transition Guide: Moving From a Decentralized to a Centralized Professional Development Department. Creation of a Novel Virtual Reality Simulation to Increase Nursing Skills in Management of Workplace Violence. An Integrative Nursing Fellowship Approach to Increase Nurse Retention. Exploring Working Relationships Between Clinical Nurse Specialists and Clinical Nurse Leaders to Better Understand Opportunities for Improvement: A Phenomenological Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1