Identifying Barriers to Being Offered and Accepting a Telehealth Visit for Cancer Care: Unpacking the Multi-Levels of Documented Racial Disparities in Telehealth Use.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14461
Matthew R Dunn, Ilona Fridman, Alan C Kinlaw, Christine Neslund-Dudas, Samantha Tam, Jennifer Elston Lafata
{"title":"Identifying Barriers to Being Offered and Accepting a Telehealth Visit for Cancer Care: Unpacking the Multi-Levels of Documented Racial Disparities in Telehealth Use.","authors":"Matthew R Dunn, Ilona Fridman, Alan C Kinlaw, Christine Neslund-Dudas, Samantha Tam, Jennifer Elston Lafata","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate patient- and area-level factors in relation to telehealth visit use in cancer care.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>We surveyed a cohort of adults with an upcoming healthcare visit related to their cancer treatment at two academic medical centers (one in central North Carolina and one in southeast Michigan) and their community affiliates. Black adults and those with a scheduled telehealth visit were purposively oversampled during recruitment. We linked respondent residential addresses to area-level measures, including broadband access. The two patient-reported outcomes of interest were (1) whether a choice in visit type (virtual or in-person) was offered and (2) scheduled visit type.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>We assembled a cohort of 773 adults (response rate = 15%). After excluding nonrecall for being offered a choice, the analytic sample was 725 adults.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The sample was 46% aged < 65 years, 42% Black, and 67% women. Black respondents were less likely than non-Black respondents to be offered a choice, 15% versus 23%, prevalence difference (PD) and 95% CI = (-8.7%, CI: -14.4, -3.0) and if offered a choice, less likely to accept a telehealth visit (20% vs. 67%; PD = -47.0%, CI: -62.0, -32.0). Compared to men, women had a lower frequency of visit choice (16% vs. 27%; PD = -10.9%. CI: -17.4, -4.4) and accepted telehealth visits (42% vs. 63%; PD = -20.8%, CI: -36.8, -4.7). Respondents who expressed technology-related worries were less likely to accept a telehealth visit. Lower area-level technology access (e.g., broadband ownership) and higher poverty were nonsignificantly associated with less offering and less scheduling of telehealth visits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interventions to improve access to telehealth in cancer care and mitigate structural inequities (namely racism and sexism) should consider patient- and area-level barriers to being offered a choice in visit type and the ability to accept a telehealth visit.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14461"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12967912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14461","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate patient- and area-level factors in relation to telehealth visit use in cancer care.

Study setting and design: We surveyed a cohort of adults with an upcoming healthcare visit related to their cancer treatment at two academic medical centers (one in central North Carolina and one in southeast Michigan) and their community affiliates. Black adults and those with a scheduled telehealth visit were purposively oversampled during recruitment. We linked respondent residential addresses to area-level measures, including broadband access. The two patient-reported outcomes of interest were (1) whether a choice in visit type (virtual or in-person) was offered and (2) scheduled visit type.

Data sources and analytic sample: We assembled a cohort of 773 adults (response rate = 15%). After excluding nonrecall for being offered a choice, the analytic sample was 725 adults.

Principal findings: The sample was 46% aged < 65 years, 42% Black, and 67% women. Black respondents were less likely than non-Black respondents to be offered a choice, 15% versus 23%, prevalence difference (PD) and 95% CI = (-8.7%, CI: -14.4, -3.0) and if offered a choice, less likely to accept a telehealth visit (20% vs. 67%; PD = -47.0%, CI: -62.0, -32.0). Compared to men, women had a lower frequency of visit choice (16% vs. 27%; PD = -10.9%. CI: -17.4, -4.4) and accepted telehealth visits (42% vs. 63%; PD = -20.8%, CI: -36.8, -4.7). Respondents who expressed technology-related worries were less likely to accept a telehealth visit. Lower area-level technology access (e.g., broadband ownership) and higher poverty were nonsignificantly associated with less offering and less scheduling of telehealth visits.

Conclusions: Interventions to improve access to telehealth in cancer care and mitigate structural inequities (namely racism and sexism) should consider patient- and area-level barriers to being offered a choice in visit type and the ability to accept a telehealth visit.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定被提供和接受癌症护理远程医疗访问的障碍:打开远程医疗使用中记录的种族差异的多层次。
目的:评价与远程医疗访问在癌症治疗中的使用有关的患者和地区水平因素。研究设置和设计:我们调查了一组成年人,他们即将在两个学术医疗中心(一个在北卡罗来纳州中部,一个在密歇根州东南部)及其社区附属机构进行与癌症治疗相关的医疗保健访问。在招募期间,有意对黑人成年人和那些有远程医疗访问计划的人进行过采样。我们将受访者的居住地址与地区层面的措施联系起来,包括宽带接入。患者报告的两个结果是(1)是否选择访问类型(虚拟或亲自)和(2)预定访问类型。数据来源和分析样本:我们收集了773名成年人(有效率为15%)。在排除被提供选择的不记得事件后,分析样本是725名成年人。结论:改善癌症护理中远程医疗的可及性和减轻结构性不平等(即种族主义和性别歧视)的干预措施应考虑患者和地区层面的障碍,使他们无法选择就诊类型和接受远程医疗就诊的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
Mind the Activation Gap: Factors Associated With Low Patient Activation Among Dual-Eligible Versus Medicare-Only Beneficiaries. Identifying Bariatric Surgery Patients With the Most Favorable Cost Outcomes. A Machine Learning Model to Improve Risk Adjustment Accuracy in Medicare. The All-Payer Claims Database After the Gobeille Supreme Court Decision: Assessing the Impact on Fatal Opioid-Related Overdose Research. Cost-Effectiveness of the Support and Services at Home (SASH) Program for Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Community-Based Approach to Healthy Aging in Place.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1