Target Vessel Cannulation with a Transfemoral Retrograde Approach Equals Antegrade Approach from the Upper Extremity in Complex Aortic Treatment with Off the Shelf Inner Branched Endografts in the Italian Branched Registry of E-nside Endograft (INBREED)☆

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.02.019
Davide Esposito , Martina Bastianon , Gioele Simonte , Emanuele Gatta , Luca Bertoglio , Andrea Gaggiano , Paolo Frigatti , Michele Piazza , Michele Antonello , Giovanni Pratesi , ItaliaN Branched Registry of E-nside EnDograft (INBREED) Investigators , Giovanni Pratesi , Giovanni Spinella , Davide Esposito , Martina Bastianon , Caterina Melani , Jorge Miguel Mena Vera , Massimo Lenti , Gioele Simonte , Giacomo Isernia , Andrea Xodo
{"title":"Target Vessel Cannulation with a Transfemoral Retrograde Approach Equals Antegrade Approach from the Upper Extremity in Complex Aortic Treatment with Off the Shelf Inner Branched Endografts in the Italian Branched Registry of E-nside Endograft (INBREED)☆","authors":"Davide Esposito ,&nbsp;Martina Bastianon ,&nbsp;Gioele Simonte ,&nbsp;Emanuele Gatta ,&nbsp;Luca Bertoglio ,&nbsp;Andrea Gaggiano ,&nbsp;Paolo Frigatti ,&nbsp;Michele Piazza ,&nbsp;Michele Antonello ,&nbsp;Giovanni Pratesi ,&nbsp;ItaliaN Branched Registry of E-nside EnDograft (INBREED) Investigators ,&nbsp;Giovanni Pratesi ,&nbsp;Giovanni Spinella ,&nbsp;Davide Esposito ,&nbsp;Martina Bastianon ,&nbsp;Caterina Melani ,&nbsp;Jorge Miguel Mena Vera ,&nbsp;Massimo Lenti ,&nbsp;Gioele Simonte ,&nbsp;Giacomo Isernia ,&nbsp;Andrea Xodo","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.02.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this study was to assess the results of an off the shelf inner branched thoraco-abdominal endograft for treating aortic pathologies, with a specific focus on comparing outcomes between antegrade and retrograde approaches for target vessel (TV) cannulation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a national, physician initiated, multicentre, observational study. Data from a registry on patients treated with the E-nside endograft were gathered prospectively. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of endovascular approach for TV cannulation. The study adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From September 2020 to February 2024, 166 procedures were collected, of which 128 (77.1%) used an antegrade upper extremity approach to TV cannulation, while 38 (22.9%) employed a retrograde femoral approach. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of bridging stent choice (balloon expandable only, 69.4% <em>vs.</em> 73.7%; self expandable only, 12.9% <em>vs.</em> 7.9%; mixed configurations, 17.7% <em>vs.</em> 18.4%; <em>p</em> = .68). The mean operation time ± standard deviation was longer for the retrograde approach (282 ± 90 minutes <em>vs.</em> 313 ± 155 minutes; <em>p</em> = .006), but fluoroscopy time, dose area product, and the volume of contrast injected were similar. Six cases of post-operative stroke were reported in the antegrade group (4.7% <em>vs.</em> 0%; <em>p</em> = .17). The 30 day TV related technical success was 94.5% and 94.7%, respectively, for antegrade and retrograde approaches (<em>p</em> = .96). Mean follow up was 14.4 ± 11.3 months (median 12.5 months). Kaplan–Meier estimates (with 95% confidence interval [CI]) at twelve months revealed similar overall survival (87.7%, 95% CI 81 – 95% <em>vs.</em> 91.1%, 95% CI 82 – 100%; log rank = .009, <em>p</em> = .92). Competing risk analysis revealed similar one year estimates of TV instability and TV related re-intervention between groups both in patient centred and TV centred analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A total transfemoral retrograde approach for TV cannulation of inner branches proved to be effective and was not associated with any neurological events.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":"69 6","pages":"Pages 812-821"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078588425001522","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the results of an off the shelf inner branched thoraco-abdominal endograft for treating aortic pathologies, with a specific focus on comparing outcomes between antegrade and retrograde approaches for target vessel (TV) cannulation.

Methods

This was a national, physician initiated, multicentre, observational study. Data from a registry on patients treated with the E-nside endograft were gathered prospectively. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of endovascular approach for TV cannulation. The study adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.

Results

From September 2020 to February 2024, 166 procedures were collected, of which 128 (77.1%) used an antegrade upper extremity approach to TV cannulation, while 38 (22.9%) employed a retrograde femoral approach. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of bridging stent choice (balloon expandable only, 69.4% vs. 73.7%; self expandable only, 12.9% vs. 7.9%; mixed configurations, 17.7% vs. 18.4%; p = .68). The mean operation time ± standard deviation was longer for the retrograde approach (282 ± 90 minutes vs. 313 ± 155 minutes; p = .006), but fluoroscopy time, dose area product, and the volume of contrast injected were similar. Six cases of post-operative stroke were reported in the antegrade group (4.7% vs. 0%; p = .17). The 30 day TV related technical success was 94.5% and 94.7%, respectively, for antegrade and retrograde approaches (p = .96). Mean follow up was 14.4 ± 11.3 months (median 12.5 months). Kaplan–Meier estimates (with 95% confidence interval [CI]) at twelve months revealed similar overall survival (87.7%, 95% CI 81 – 95% vs. 91.1%, 95% CI 82 – 100%; log rank = .009, p = .92). Competing risk analysis revealed similar one year estimates of TV instability and TV related re-intervention between groups both in patient centred and TV centred analyses.

Conclusion

A total transfemoral retrograde approach for TV cannulation of inner branches proved to be effective and was not associated with any neurological events.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经股动脉逆行入路的靶血管插管与从上肢顺行治疗复杂主动脉用现成的内支内移植物(INBREED)。
目的:本研究的目的是评估一种现成的内分支胸腹内移植物治疗主动脉病变的结果,特别关注于比较顺行和逆行靶血管插管的结果。方法:这是一项全国性的、医生发起的、多中心的观察性研究。前瞻性地收集了接受e - inside内移植物治疗的患者的登记数据。根据电视插管的血管内入路类型将患者分为两组。该研究遵循加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)指南。结果:从2020年9月至2024年2月,共收集166例手术,其中128例(77.1%)采用电视插管与上肢顺行入路,38例(22.9%)采用股骨逆行入路。在桥接支架的选择方面,两组间无统计学差异(仅球囊可膨胀支架,69.4% vs. 73.7%;仅可自膨胀,12.9% vs. 7.9%;混合配置,17.7% vs. 18.4%;P = .68)。逆行入路的平均手术时间±标准差更长(282±90分钟vs. 313±155分钟);P = .006),但透视时间、剂量面积积、注射造影剂量相似。顺行组报告6例术后卒中(4.7% vs 0%;P = .17)。顺行和逆行入路30天电视相关技术成功率分别为94.5%和94.7% (p = 0.96)。平均随访14.4±11.3个月(中位12.5个月)。Kaplan-Meier估计(95%可信区间[CI])在12个月时显示相似的总生存率(87.7%,95% CI 81 - 95% vs. 91.1%, 95% CI 82 - 100%;日志等级=。009, p = .92)。竞争风险分析显示,在以患者为中心和以电视为中心的分析中,两组之间电视不稳定性和电视相关再干预的一年估计相似。结论:全经股逆行入路内支电视插管被证明是有效的,并且与任何神经事件无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
471
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery is aimed primarily at vascular surgeons dealing with patients with arterial, venous and lymphatic diseases. Contributions are included on the diagnosis, investigation and management of these vascular disorders. Papers that consider the technical aspects of vascular surgery are encouraged, and the journal includes invited state-of-the-art articles. Reflecting the increasing importance of endovascular techniques in the management of vascular diseases and the value of closer collaboration between the vascular surgeon and the vascular radiologist, the journal has now extended its scope to encompass the growing number of contributions from this exciting field. Articles describing endovascular method and their critical evaluation are included, as well as reports on the emerging technology associated with this field.
期刊最新文献
Long Term Outcomes of Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair with Branched Endoprosthesis or Carotid-Subclavian Bypass: A Propensity Matched Study. Pedal Artery Angioplasty: Beneficial or Just Cosmetic? Target Vessel Binary Re-stenosis following the Use of Paclitaxel Coated Versus Uncoated Devices during Infrainguinal Endovascular Revascularisation of Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease: Exploratory Data from the SWEDEPAD 1 and 2 Trials. Outcomes of Custom Made and Off the Shelf Endografts for Preservation of the Left Subclavian Artery during Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Reaching the Red Planet: Critical Approaches to Vascular Surgical Emergencies in Human Deep Space Exploration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1