Plasma calprotectin as a biomarker of inflammatory activity in ulcerative colitis

Medicina clinica (English ed.) Pub Date : 2025-02-28 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.medcle.2024.09.015
Maria José Temido , Margarida Peixinho , Rosário Cunha , Andrea Silva , Sandra Lopes , Sofia Mendes , Ana Margarida Ferreira , Manuela Ferreira , Pedro Figueiredo , Francisco Portela
{"title":"Plasma calprotectin as a biomarker of inflammatory activity in ulcerative colitis","authors":"Maria José Temido ,&nbsp;Margarida Peixinho ,&nbsp;Rosário Cunha ,&nbsp;Andrea Silva ,&nbsp;Sandra Lopes ,&nbsp;Sofia Mendes ,&nbsp;Ana Margarida Ferreira ,&nbsp;Manuela Ferreira ,&nbsp;Pedro Figueiredo ,&nbsp;Francisco Portela","doi":"10.1016/j.medcle.2024.09.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>An ideal test to evaluate the inflammatory burden in ulcerative colitis is still an unmet need. Fecal calprotectin (FCP) and C-reactive protein (CRP) have significant limitations. Plasma calprotectin (PC) seems to be promising in inflammatory diseases, but its value in IBD is still to be determined. Our aim was to assess whether PC correlates with inflammatory activity in UC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Prospective single center cohort study. Consecutive patients previously diagnosed with UC undergoing endoscopy were included (June 2021–September 2022). Demographic, clinical, analytical (CRP, PC and FCP), endoscopic and histologic data was collected at the time of colonoscopy. PC was assessed with Gentian Calprotectin Immunoassay and, in a subgroup of patients, also with QUANTA Flash Circulating Calprotectin from INOVA.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Inclusion of 98 patients (60.2% male) with a median age 49 (38–61) years. The extent of colitis was distal in 12 (12.2%), left-sided in 49 (50%), and extensive in 37 (37.8%). Mesalazine was taken by 65 (66.3%) patients, with biologic monotherapy used in 24 (24.5%) and combination therapy in 6 (6.1%). Clinical, endoscopic and histological remission were detected, in 56 (57.1%), 48 (49%) and in 55 (56.1%) patients, respectively.</div><div>Comparing MES 0/1 vs MES 2/3, a statistically significant difference was found with PC, CRP and FCP. Concerning endoscopic (MES<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1) and histological (GS<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->2) remission, FCP was the only biomarker able to detect these outcomes. PC (Gentian) and PCi (INOVA) were highly correlated with CRP.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PC has low value in distinguishing patients in remission from patients with endoscopic or histologic activity in UC. This essential role must continue be played by FCP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74154,"journal":{"name":"Medicina clinica (English ed.)","volume":"164 4","pages":"Pages 168-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina clinica (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S238702062500066X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

An ideal test to evaluate the inflammatory burden in ulcerative colitis is still an unmet need. Fecal calprotectin (FCP) and C-reactive protein (CRP) have significant limitations. Plasma calprotectin (PC) seems to be promising in inflammatory diseases, but its value in IBD is still to be determined. Our aim was to assess whether PC correlates with inflammatory activity in UC.

Methods

Prospective single center cohort study. Consecutive patients previously diagnosed with UC undergoing endoscopy were included (June 2021–September 2022). Demographic, clinical, analytical (CRP, PC and FCP), endoscopic and histologic data was collected at the time of colonoscopy. PC was assessed with Gentian Calprotectin Immunoassay and, in a subgroup of patients, also with QUANTA Flash Circulating Calprotectin from INOVA.

Results

Inclusion of 98 patients (60.2% male) with a median age 49 (38–61) years. The extent of colitis was distal in 12 (12.2%), left-sided in 49 (50%), and extensive in 37 (37.8%). Mesalazine was taken by 65 (66.3%) patients, with biologic monotherapy used in 24 (24.5%) and combination therapy in 6 (6.1%). Clinical, endoscopic and histological remission were detected, in 56 (57.1%), 48 (49%) and in 55 (56.1%) patients, respectively.
Comparing MES 0/1 vs MES 2/3, a statistically significant difference was found with PC, CRP and FCP. Concerning endoscopic (MES = 1) and histological (GS < 2) remission, FCP was the only biomarker able to detect these outcomes. PC (Gentian) and PCi (INOVA) were highly correlated with CRP.

Conclusion

PC has low value in distinguishing patients in remission from patients with endoscopic or histologic activity in UC. This essential role must continue be played by FCP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血浆钙保护蛋白作为溃疡性结肠炎炎症活性的生物标志物
背景:一种评估溃疡性结肠炎炎症负担的理想试验仍未得到满足。粪钙保护蛋白(FCP)和c反应蛋白(CRP)有明显的局限性。血浆钙保护蛋白(PC)在炎性疾病中似乎很有前景,但其在IBD中的价值仍有待确定。我们的目的是评估PC是否与UC的炎症活动相关。方法前瞻性单中心队列研究。先前诊断为UC的连续患者接受内窥镜检查(2021年6月至2022年9月)。在结肠镜检查时收集人口统计学、临床、分析(CRP、PC和FCP)、内镜和组织学资料。用龙胆草钙护蛋白免疫分析法评估PC,在一个亚组患者中,也使用INOVA的QUANTA Flash循环钙护蛋白。结果纳入98例患者,男性60.2%,中位年龄49(38 ~ 61)岁。结肠炎远端12例(12.2%),左侧49例(50%),广泛37例(37.8%)。服用美沙拉嗪65例(66.3%),生物单药治疗24例(24.5%),联合治疗6例(6.1%)。临床、内镜和组织学缓解分别为56例(57.1%)、48例(49%)和55例(56.1%)。比较MES 0/1与MES 2/3,发现PC、CRP和FCP差异有统计学意义。关于内镜(MES = 1)和组织学(GS <;2)缓解,FCP是唯一能够检测这些结果的生物标志物。PC (Gentian)、PCi (INOVA)与CRP高度相关。结论pc在鉴别UC缓解患者与内镜或组织学活动患者方面价值较低。FCP必须继续发挥这一重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reply to: “Behçet's syndrome” Clinical implications of cardiac involvement in Q fever: Findings from a Spanish cohort Rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis Coral dermatitis Hypertrophy of great auricular nerve in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1