Unveiling the asymmetric dynamic spillovers in industry bond credit risk: Is the energy industry the prime mover?

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Financial Analysis Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104014
Yi-Shuai Ren , Tony Klein , Yong Jiang
{"title":"Unveiling the asymmetric dynamic spillovers in industry bond credit risk: Is the energy industry the prime mover?","authors":"Yi-Shuai Ren ,&nbsp;Tony Klein ,&nbsp;Yong Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study employs a novel asymmetric time-varying parameter vector autoregressive (TVP-VAR) based connectedness approach to examine the dynamic return connectedness between industry bond credit spreads in China. This study specifically focuses on identifying the factors that contribute to connectedness. The empirical findings suggest that (1) the average total connectedness index (TCI) remains consistently high throughout the period, with particularly noteworthy surges during crises such as the COVID-19 epidemic and the Russia-Ukraine war. (2) The TCI for positive returns is greater than that for negative returns for the industry bond credit spread. This confirms that the strength of inter-industry connections grows when there is an increase in credit risk in the bond market. (3) The power and coal industries are net transmitters of credit risk, while the gas and new energy industries are net receivers. This tendency is particularly noticeable in the overall returns and the positive returns spillover systems. (4) The spillover of credit risk in the industry bond market can be attributed to the connections within the supply chain among different industries. Core industries, including transportation, real estate, and non-bank financial industries, typically play a major role as net transmitters, whereas non-core industries usually as receivers. (5) The TCI is heavily influenced by global shocks, such as international oil volatility, global climate transition risk, U.S. economic policy uncertainty, and global geopolitical risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 104014"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925001012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study employs a novel asymmetric time-varying parameter vector autoregressive (TVP-VAR) based connectedness approach to examine the dynamic return connectedness between industry bond credit spreads in China. This study specifically focuses on identifying the factors that contribute to connectedness. The empirical findings suggest that (1) the average total connectedness index (TCI) remains consistently high throughout the period, with particularly noteworthy surges during crises such as the COVID-19 epidemic and the Russia-Ukraine war. (2) The TCI for positive returns is greater than that for negative returns for the industry bond credit spread. This confirms that the strength of inter-industry connections grows when there is an increase in credit risk in the bond market. (3) The power and coal industries are net transmitters of credit risk, while the gas and new energy industries are net receivers. This tendency is particularly noticeable in the overall returns and the positive returns spillover systems. (4) The spillover of credit risk in the industry bond market can be attributed to the connections within the supply chain among different industries. Core industries, including transportation, real estate, and non-bank financial industries, typically play a major role as net transmitters, whereas non-core industries usually as receivers. (5) The TCI is heavily influenced by global shocks, such as international oil volatility, global climate transition risk, U.S. economic policy uncertainty, and global geopolitical risks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示工业债券信用风险的不对称动态溢出效应:能源行业是主要推动者吗?
本文采用一种新颖的基于非对称时变参数向量自回归(tpv -var)的连通性方法来检验中国行业债券信用利差之间的动态收益连通性。这项研究特别侧重于确定有助于连通性的因素。实证结果表明:(1)在此期间,平均总连通性指数(TCI)始终保持在较高水平,在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情和俄乌战争等危机期间,TCI的飙升尤为显著。(2)行业债券信用利差正收益的TCI大于负收益的TCI。这证实了当债券市场的信用风险增加时,行业间联系的强度会增加。(3)电力和煤炭行业是信用风险的净发送者,天然气和新能源行业是信用风险的净接收者。这种趋势在总体收益和正收益溢出体系中尤为明显。(4)行业债券市场信用风险的外溢可以归因于不同行业之间供应链内部的联系。核心行业,包括交通、房地产和非银行金融行业,通常作为净发送者发挥主要作用,而非核心行业通常作为接收者发挥主要作用。(5) TCI受国际油价波动、全球气候转型风险、美国经济政策不确定性、全球地缘政治风险等全球冲击的影响较大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to ‘Modelling time-varying volatility interactions’ [International Review of Financial Analysis, 111(2026) 105098] Non-financial misconduct and M&A returns: Evidence from workplace misconduct CEOs’ early-life disaster experiences and corporate hedging activities Monetary policy surprises and the cross sectional stock return predictability in volume sorted portfolios The yield curve strikes back: New evidence of its predictive power for economic activity and inflation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1