The modulation of selective attention and divided attention on cross-modal congruence

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING NeuroImage Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121093
Honghui Xu , Guochun Yang , Florian Göschl , Qiaoyue Ren , Mei Yu , Qi Li , Xun Liu
{"title":"The modulation of selective attention and divided attention on cross-modal congruence","authors":"Honghui Xu ,&nbsp;Guochun Yang ,&nbsp;Florian Göschl ,&nbsp;Qiaoyue Ren ,&nbsp;Mei Yu ,&nbsp;Qi Li ,&nbsp;Xun Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies have demonstrated that performance under selective attention and divided attention can be enhanced or impaired, depending on whether the stimuli from different modalities are the same or different. However, it remains unclear whether the modulation of selective attention and divided attention on cross-modal congruence involves shared or distinct neural mechanisms. To clarify this, the present study adopted an audiovisual Stroop task (measuring selective attention) and an audiovisual Matching task (measuring divided attention), using the same physical stimuli, along with event-related potential (ERP) and time-frequency measures. The behavioral results revealed better performance when the auditory and visual stimuli were the same in both tasks. Electroencephalography (EEG) results revealed that different auditory and visual stimuli elicited increased N2 and late positive component (LPC) amplitudes, as well as increased theta power, in both tasks. Moreover, in the audiovisual Matching task, the P3 amplitude was lower in the different condition, and the delta power was greater in the same condition. However, in the audiovisual Stroop task, the amplitude of the N450 component was greater, and beta power was lower, in the different condition. These results indicate that both shared and distinct neural mechanisms underlie the modulation of different types of attention on cross-modal congruence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19299,"journal":{"name":"NeuroImage","volume":"309 ","pages":"Article 121093"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroImage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811925000953","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that performance under selective attention and divided attention can be enhanced or impaired, depending on whether the stimuli from different modalities are the same or different. However, it remains unclear whether the modulation of selective attention and divided attention on cross-modal congruence involves shared or distinct neural mechanisms. To clarify this, the present study adopted an audiovisual Stroop task (measuring selective attention) and an audiovisual Matching task (measuring divided attention), using the same physical stimuli, along with event-related potential (ERP) and time-frequency measures. The behavioral results revealed better performance when the auditory and visual stimuli were the same in both tasks. Electroencephalography (EEG) results revealed that different auditory and visual stimuli elicited increased N2 and late positive component (LPC) amplitudes, as well as increased theta power, in both tasks. Moreover, in the audiovisual Matching task, the P3 amplitude was lower in the different condition, and the delta power was greater in the same condition. However, in the audiovisual Stroop task, the amplitude of the N450 component was greater, and beta power was lower, in the different condition. These results indicate that both shared and distinct neural mechanisms underlie the modulation of different types of attention on cross-modal congruence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择性注意和分割注意对跨模态一致性的调节
以往的研究表明,选择性注意和分散注意下的表现可以增强或减弱,这取决于来自不同模式的刺激是相同还是不同。然而,目前尚不清楚选择性注意和分裂注意对跨模态一致性的调节是否涉及共同的或不同的神经机制。为了澄清这一点,本研究采用了视听Stroop任务(测量选择性注意)和视听匹配任务(测量分裂注意),使用相同的物理刺激,以及事件相关电位(ERP)和时间-频率测量。行为结果显示,当听觉和视觉刺激在两项任务中相同时,表现更好。脑电图(EEG)结果显示,不同的听觉和视觉刺激在两种任务中均引起N2和后期正分量(LPC)振幅的增加,以及θ波功率的增加。在视听匹配任务中,不同条件下P3振幅较低,相同条件下δ功率较大。然而,在视听Stroop任务中,不同条件下N450分量的振幅都较大,而β功率则较低。这些结果表明,在不同类型的注意对跨模态一致性的调节中,既有共同的神经机制,也有不同的神经机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NeuroImage
NeuroImage 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
809
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: NeuroImage, a Journal of Brain Function provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in acquiring, analyzing, and modelling neuroimaging data and in applying these techniques to the study of structure-function and brain-behavior relationships. Though the emphasis is on the macroscopic level of human brain organization, meso-and microscopic neuroimaging across all species will be considered if informative for understanding the aforementioned relationships.
期刊最新文献
The Erlangen Program in Lateral Occipital Cortex: Hierarchical Encoding of Emergent Features. Slow waves generation and propagation in a model of brain lesions. Cerebrovascular 5D flow MRI. (Don't) take it personally: EEG markers of preparing lies about autobiographical questions. Interictal epileptiform discharges propagation revealed by MEG/foramen ovale-EEG co-recording in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy candidate to neurosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1