SEAL+: A subgraph-enhanced framework for link prediction with graph neural networks

IF 10.4 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Industrial Information Integration Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jii.2025.100802
Reyhane Karami , S. Mehdi Vahidipour , Alireza Rezvanian
{"title":"SEAL+: A subgraph-enhanced framework for link prediction with graph neural networks","authors":"Reyhane Karami ,&nbsp;S. Mehdi Vahidipour ,&nbsp;Alireza Rezvanian","doi":"10.1016/j.jii.2025.100802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Link prediction is a critical research topic in network analysis, typically formulated as a classification problem where the goal is to determine whether a link exists between a pair of nodes (denoted as 1 in existence and 0 for non-existence). In most existing works, the feature vectors of a pair of nodes are combined to obtain the feature vector representing the link between them; these feature vectors (or embeddings) are constructed using graph neural networks (GNNs). This paper uses a GNN-based link prediction method called EAL as the baseline. EAL consists of an Encoder and a Decoder. A significant challenge in EAL is that the feature vector extracted by the GNN can be identical for different pairs of nodes. To address this issue, we propose leveraging the concept of subgraphs to enhance link prediction performance. To this end, the Encoder is equipped with subgraphs, forming the SEAL framework. One limitation of SEAL is that it generates identical link representations for different links when the embeddings of the nodes involved are the same. To overcome this limitation, the Decoder of SEAL also uses the subgraph information, resulting in the novel framework SEAL+. We evaluate these two frameworks against baseline methods using various metrics, demonstrating their superiority. Specifically, SEAL+ achieves average improvements of 10.25 %, 17.25 %, 3.75 %, and 4.65 % in terms of accuracy, F1-Score, average precision, and area under the precision-recall curve, respectively, compared to the SEAL.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Information Integration","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100802"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Information Integration","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452414X25000263","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Link prediction is a critical research topic in network analysis, typically formulated as a classification problem where the goal is to determine whether a link exists between a pair of nodes (denoted as 1 in existence and 0 for non-existence). In most existing works, the feature vectors of a pair of nodes are combined to obtain the feature vector representing the link between them; these feature vectors (or embeddings) are constructed using graph neural networks (GNNs). This paper uses a GNN-based link prediction method called EAL as the baseline. EAL consists of an Encoder and a Decoder. A significant challenge in EAL is that the feature vector extracted by the GNN can be identical for different pairs of nodes. To address this issue, we propose leveraging the concept of subgraphs to enhance link prediction performance. To this end, the Encoder is equipped with subgraphs, forming the SEAL framework. One limitation of SEAL is that it generates identical link representations for different links when the embeddings of the nodes involved are the same. To overcome this limitation, the Decoder of SEAL also uses the subgraph information, resulting in the novel framework SEAL+. We evaluate these two frameworks against baseline methods using various metrics, demonstrating their superiority. Specifically, SEAL+ achieves average improvements of 10.25 %, 17.25 %, 3.75 %, and 4.65 % in terms of accuracy, F1-Score, average precision, and area under the precision-recall curve, respectively, compared to the SEAL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Information Integration
Journal of Industrial Information Integration Decision Sciences-Information Systems and Management
CiteScore
22.30
自引率
13.40%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Information Integration focuses on the industry's transition towards industrial integration and informatization, covering not only hardware and software but also information integration. It serves as a platform for promoting advances in industrial information integration, addressing challenges, issues, and solutions in an interdisciplinary forum for researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. The Journal of Industrial Information Integration welcomes papers on foundational, technical, and practical aspects of industrial information integration, emphasizing the complex and cross-disciplinary topics that arise in industrial integration. Techniques from mathematical science, computer science, computer engineering, electrical and electronic engineering, manufacturing engineering, and engineering management are crucial in this context.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Challenges in feature importance interpretation: Analyzing LSTM-NN predictions in battery material flotation Compendium law in iterative information management: A comprehensive model perspective Geometric deep learning as an enabler for data consistency and interoperability in manufacturing High-speed image enhancement: Real-time super-resolution and artifact removal for degraded analog footage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1