I do not think before I leap (buy)! Impulse buying: An integrative review and future research directions

IF 2.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Acta Psychologica Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104822
Mohita Maggon
{"title":"I do not think before I leap (buy)! Impulse buying: An integrative review and future research directions","authors":"Mohita Maggon","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of this paper was to use bibliometric analysis to fill a gap in the research and provide a detailed review of the impulse buying (IB) literature. A total of 541 journal articles published between 2014 and 2023 were retrieved from Scopus and systematically analyzed. The findings indicate that IB has received ample attention in previous studies. Four prominent clusters were identified using co-citation network analysis. The United States was the most influential country, with the most publications and citations in terms of IB research. In the past, authors have analyzed many factors that influence IB. However, some research areas remain underexplored, such as the impacts of the metaverse, artificial intelligence, and live commerce on IB. The findings have relevant implications for psychologists who focus on IB. IB is a crucial concept relevant to psychology and marketing researchers interested in uncovering novel psychological dimensions and requires timely reviews. Previous reviews have either been descriptive/conceptual (literature reviews re-examining and defining the construct) or contextual (meta-analyses of impulse buying in hospitality). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to explore IB's past, present, and future using bibliometric and content analysis across various online and offline buying platforms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 104822"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825001350","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to use bibliometric analysis to fill a gap in the research and provide a detailed review of the impulse buying (IB) literature. A total of 541 journal articles published between 2014 and 2023 were retrieved from Scopus and systematically analyzed. The findings indicate that IB has received ample attention in previous studies. Four prominent clusters were identified using co-citation network analysis. The United States was the most influential country, with the most publications and citations in terms of IB research. In the past, authors have analyzed many factors that influence IB. However, some research areas remain underexplored, such as the impacts of the metaverse, artificial intelligence, and live commerce on IB. The findings have relevant implications for psychologists who focus on IB. IB is a crucial concept relevant to psychology and marketing researchers interested in uncovering novel psychological dimensions and requires timely reviews. Previous reviews have either been descriptive/conceptual (literature reviews re-examining and defining the construct) or contextual (meta-analyses of impulse buying in hospitality). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to explore IB's past, present, and future using bibliometric and content analysis across various online and offline buying platforms.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我不三思而后行(买)!冲动购买:综合综述及未来研究方向
本文的目的是利用文献计量学分析来填补研究的空白,并提供冲动购买(IB)文献的详细回顾。从Scopus检索2014 - 2023年间发表的541篇期刊文章并进行系统分析。研究结果表明,IB在以往的研究中得到了充分的重视。利用共引网络分析确定了四个突出的聚类。美国是最具影响力的国家,在IB研究方面的出版物和引用次数最多。过去,作者已经分析了许多影响IB的因素,然而,一些研究领域仍未得到充分探索,如元宇宙、人工智能和实时商业对IB的影响。这些发现对关注IB的心理学家有相关的启示。IB是一个重要的概念,与心理学和营销研究人员有兴趣发现新的心理维度,需要及时审查。之前的评论要么是描述性的/概念性的(重新检查和定义结构的文献评论),要么是情境性的(对酒店业冲动购买的元分析)。据我们所知,这是第一个利用文献计量学和内容分析在各种线上和线下购买平台上探索IB的过去、现在和未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
期刊最新文献
The influence of e-commerce virtual streamer characteristics on consumers' purchase intention: Based on a hybrid SEM-ANN approach Attentional strategies and ancillary gestures in resisting unintentional synchronization during joint action Transitions of School-Family-Community assets profiles and their associations with adolescent positive development and adjustment Doing well by doing good: The role of entrepreneurial mindfulness, social capital, and moral obligation in social entrepreneurial intentions Associations of work- and personal-life-related techno-stressors with emotional exhaustion, sickness absenteeism, and turnover intentions in public administration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1