Prospective radiotherapy quality Assurance leads to delineation guideline refinements for recurrent rectal cancer: Experience from the PelvEx II study

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.ctro.2025.100934
F. Piqeur , B.J.P. Hupkens , D.M.J. Creemers , S. Nordkamp , M. Berbee , J. Buijsen , H.J.T. Rutten , C.A.M. Marijnen , J.W.A. Burger , H.M.U. Peulen
{"title":"Prospective radiotherapy quality Assurance leads to delineation guideline refinements for recurrent rectal cancer: Experience from the PelvEx II study","authors":"F. Piqeur ,&nbsp;B.J.P. Hupkens ,&nbsp;D.M.J. Creemers ,&nbsp;S. Nordkamp ,&nbsp;M. Berbee ,&nbsp;J. Buijsen ,&nbsp;H.J.T. Rutten ,&nbsp;C.A.M. Marijnen ,&nbsp;J.W.A. Burger ,&nbsp;H.M.U. Peulen","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2025.100934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Target volume delineation in locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) is clinically challenging. To ensure the quality of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) within the PelvEx II trial, a delineation guideline was developed and prospective quality assurance (QA) was instated for all patients. Guideline adherence, the impact of QA on target volumes, and subsequent guideline refinements are described in this paper.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><div>All PelvEx II patients, either RT naive patients (50–50.4 Gy) or reirradiation (30 Gy) patients, were eligible for QA prior to CRT. An online meeting with the treating physician and the QA team was planned for each patient prior to treatment, to peer review delineations. Adherence to each of the 7 (reirradiation) or 8 (RT naive) guideline recommendations was scored. Suggested target volume adjustments and any reasons to deviate from protocol were noted. When applicable, target volumes before and after QA were compared. Possible protocol refinements were discussed amongst the trial QA team.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Prospective review of 113 cases of LRRC was performed, resulting in a high QA compliance rate of 90 %. All guideline recommendations were followed in 53 % of cases. Changes to the GTV and CTV were advised in 21 and 39 cases respectively. A median increase of GTV (+29 % (p &lt; 0.001)) and CTV (+15 % (p &lt; 0.001)) was seen in reirradiation patients, versus a median CTV increase of + 6 % (p = 0.002) in RT naive patients following QA. Deviations from protocol were accepted in 30 cases (27 %). Thirteen protocol refinements were agreed upon.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Peer-review of LRRC target volumes leads to altered target volumes in up to 48% of cases, resulting in an updated delineation guideline.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"52 ","pages":"Article 100934"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630825000242","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Target volume delineation in locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) is clinically challenging. To ensure the quality of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) within the PelvEx II trial, a delineation guideline was developed and prospective quality assurance (QA) was instated for all patients. Guideline adherence, the impact of QA on target volumes, and subsequent guideline refinements are described in this paper.

Methods and materials

All PelvEx II patients, either RT naive patients (50–50.4 Gy) or reirradiation (30 Gy) patients, were eligible for QA prior to CRT. An online meeting with the treating physician and the QA team was planned for each patient prior to treatment, to peer review delineations. Adherence to each of the 7 (reirradiation) or 8 (RT naive) guideline recommendations was scored. Suggested target volume adjustments and any reasons to deviate from protocol were noted. When applicable, target volumes before and after QA were compared. Possible protocol refinements were discussed amongst the trial QA team.

Results

Prospective review of 113 cases of LRRC was performed, resulting in a high QA compliance rate of 90 %. All guideline recommendations were followed in 53 % of cases. Changes to the GTV and CTV were advised in 21 and 39 cases respectively. A median increase of GTV (+29 % (p < 0.001)) and CTV (+15 % (p < 0.001)) was seen in reirradiation patients, versus a median CTV increase of + 6 % (p = 0.002) in RT naive patients following QA. Deviations from protocol were accepted in 30 cases (27 %). Thirteen protocol refinements were agreed upon.

Conclusion

Peer-review of LRRC target volumes leads to altered target volumes in up to 48% of cases, resulting in an updated delineation guideline.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
The doses to Organs at risk and their Proximity to target volumes are crucial Determinants of brachytherapy toxicity Prospective radiotherapy quality Assurance leads to delineation guideline refinements for recurrent rectal cancer: Experience from the PelvEx II study A fully automated machine-learning-based workflow for radiation treatment planning in prostate cancer Comparison of 18F-FET-PET- and MRI-based target definition for re-irradiation treatment of recurrent diffuse glioma Evaluation of the effect of metformin as a radiosensitiser in solid tumours: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1