6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate as a safer alternative to PFOS: Comparative cytotoxicity and oxidative stress mechanisms in pancreatic β-cells (INS-1 model)

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY Toxicology in Vitro Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.tiv.2025.106034
Xiao-Min Ren, Jianying Wang, Fenqing Zhao, Pingping Zhang, Zhenghuan Zhang, Zhongneng Yang, Huan He, Zhixiang Xu, Bin Huang, Xuejun Pan
{"title":"6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate as a safer alternative to PFOS: Comparative cytotoxicity and oxidative stress mechanisms in pancreatic β-cells (INS-1 model)","authors":"Xiao-Min Ren,&nbsp;Jianying Wang,&nbsp;Fenqing Zhao,&nbsp;Pingping Zhang,&nbsp;Zhenghuan Zhang,&nbsp;Zhongneng Yang,&nbsp;Huan He,&nbsp;Zhixiang Xu,&nbsp;Bin Huang,&nbsp;Xuejun Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.tiv.2025.106034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies suggest that 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate (6:2 FTSA) exhibits lower hepatotoxicity and reduced reproductive and developmental toxicity compared to perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), indicating it may offer a safer alternative. This study aimed to investigate whether 6:2 FTSA is safer than PFOS in terms of its cytotoxic effects on pancreatic β-cells. Using rat insulinoma cells (INS-1) as a model of pancreatic β-cells, we compared the effects of 6:2 FTSA and PFOS in both their acid (6:2 FTSA-H, PFOS-H) and potassium salt forms (6:2 FTSA-K, PFOS-K) on cell viability through Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assays, Trypan Blue staining, and apoptosis assays. Results indicated that 6:2 FTSA was less toxic to INS-1 cells than PFOS (6:2 FTSA-H &lt; PFOS-H; 6:2 FTSA-K &lt; PFOS-K), the LOECs of 6:2 FTSA-H, 6:2 FTSA-K, PFOS-H, and PFOS-K were 150 μM, 150 μM, 20 μM, and 10 μM under FBS free conditions, respectively. To further explore whether these compounds induce cell death via oxidative stress, we measured intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels. All four compounds induced oxidative stress in INS-1 cells, with oxidative stress levels corresponding to cytotoxicity, suggesting β-cell death may occur via an oxidative stress mechanism. In conclusion, this study supports the notion that 6:2 FTSA is a safer alternative to PFOS, particularly regarding risks related to pancreatic β-cell cytotoxic effects. While the in vitro experiments in this study provide valuable preliminary information on the compounds' effects on cells and their mechanisms, they cannot fully capture the complexity of the in vivo environment. Therefore, future research should include in vivo experiments to validate the findings from the in vitro studies and comprehensively evaluate the actual effects of the compounds in living organisms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54423,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology in Vitro","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 106034"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology in Vitro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887233325000281","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate (6:2 FTSA) exhibits lower hepatotoxicity and reduced reproductive and developmental toxicity compared to perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), indicating it may offer a safer alternative. This study aimed to investigate whether 6:2 FTSA is safer than PFOS in terms of its cytotoxic effects on pancreatic β-cells. Using rat insulinoma cells (INS-1) as a model of pancreatic β-cells, we compared the effects of 6:2 FTSA and PFOS in both their acid (6:2 FTSA-H, PFOS-H) and potassium salt forms (6:2 FTSA-K, PFOS-K) on cell viability through Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assays, Trypan Blue staining, and apoptosis assays. Results indicated that 6:2 FTSA was less toxic to INS-1 cells than PFOS (6:2 FTSA-H < PFOS-H; 6:2 FTSA-K < PFOS-K), the LOECs of 6:2 FTSA-H, 6:2 FTSA-K, PFOS-H, and PFOS-K were 150 μM, 150 μM, 20 μM, and 10 μM under FBS free conditions, respectively. To further explore whether these compounds induce cell death via oxidative stress, we measured intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels. All four compounds induced oxidative stress in INS-1 cells, with oxidative stress levels corresponding to cytotoxicity, suggesting β-cell death may occur via an oxidative stress mechanism. In conclusion, this study supports the notion that 6:2 FTSA is a safer alternative to PFOS, particularly regarding risks related to pancreatic β-cell cytotoxic effects. While the in vitro experiments in this study provide valuable preliminary information on the compounds' effects on cells and their mechanisms, they cannot fully capture the complexity of the in vivo environment. Therefore, future research should include in vivo experiments to validate the findings from the in vitro studies and comprehensively evaluate the actual effects of the compounds in living organisms.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Toxicology in Vitro
Toxicology in Vitro 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
181
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Toxicology in Vitro publishes original research papers and reviews on the application and use of in vitro systems for assessing or predicting the toxic effects of chemicals and elucidating their mechanisms of action. These in vitro techniques include utilizing cell or tissue cultures, isolated cells, tissue slices, subcellular fractions, transgenic cell cultures, and cells from transgenic organisms, as well as in silico modelling. The Journal will focus on investigations that involve the development and validation of new in vitro methods, e.g. for prediction of toxic effects based on traditional and in silico modelling; on the use of methods in high-throughput toxicology and pharmacology; elucidation of mechanisms of toxic action; the application of genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics in toxicology, as well as on comparative studies that characterise the relationship between in vitro and in vivo findings. The Journal strongly encourages the submission of manuscripts that focus on the development of in vitro methods, their practical applications and regulatory use (e.g. in the areas of food components cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and industrial chemicals). Toxicology in Vitro discourages papers that record reporting on toxicological effects from materials, such as plant extracts or herbal medicines, that have not been chemically characterized.
期刊最新文献
Reexamining the acute toxicity of chloropicrin: Comprehensive estimation using in silico methods Editorial Board An interdisciplinary approach to assessing the toxicity reduction of cerium oxide nanoparticles coated with polyethylene glycol and polyvinylpyrrolidone polymers: An in vitro study. Applicability of the SENS-IS assay to assess skin sensitization of medical devices according the technical specification ISO/TS11796 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate as a safer alternative to PFOS: Comparative cytotoxicity and oxidative stress mechanisms in pancreatic β-cells (INS-1 model)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1