Zero superior vena cava injury lead extraction with rotational system: A contemporary experience

Iverson E. Williams BS, Omar M. Sharaf MD, Ryan Azarrafiy MD, MPH, Daniel Demos MD, Eric I. Jeng MD, MBA, Kirsten A. Freeman MD, John R. Spratt MD, Thomas M. Beaver MD, MPH
{"title":"Zero superior vena cava injury lead extraction with rotational system: A contemporary experience","authors":"Iverson E. Williams BS,&nbsp;Omar M. Sharaf MD,&nbsp;Ryan Azarrafiy MD, MPH,&nbsp;Daniel Demos MD,&nbsp;Eric I. Jeng MD, MBA,&nbsp;Kirsten A. Freeman MD,&nbsp;John R. Spratt MD,&nbsp;Thomas M. Beaver MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.11.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Transvenous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction (TLE) is susceptible to superior vena cava (SVC) injury and can be performed in the operating room (OR) or electrophysiology lab via a mechanical device or laser-powered extraction. This study reflects a contemporary experience of mechanical right-left rotational extraction by cardiac surgeons in the OR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective single-center review of adult (age ≥18 years) TLE cases performed by cardiac surgeons between 2019 and 2021. Leads were extracted via a transvenous mechanical right-left controlled-rotation system in the OR under general anesthesia with transesophageal echocardiographic guidance. Procedural success was defined as complete extraction of all leads without major complications, based on the Heart Rhythm Society's 2017 guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 210 leads were extracted from 104 patients, including 72 males (69%). The mean patient age was 63.8 ± 16.7 years, and 26 patients (25%) had undergone prior sternotomy. The most common indication for CIED extraction was infection (69%; n = 72). Removed CIEDs included single-chamber defibrillators (46%; n = 48), pacemakers (33%; n = 34), and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices (21%; n = 22). The mean age of the oldest extracted lead by patient was 9.79 ± 7.25 years. Procedural success was obtained in 95% of cases (99/104). The remaining cases included distal lead fracture (n = 3), inferior vena cava laceration necessitating sternotomy (n = 1), and tricuspid valve damage requiring delayed valve replacement (n = 1). There were zero SVC injuries, and procedure-related mortality was 0%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Mechanical, controlled-rotation TLE is effective and can be performed safely without SVC injury. TLE by cardiac surgeons in the OR enables rapid conversion to sternotomy in the event of major complications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"23 ","pages":"Pages 171-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624003899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Transvenous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction (TLE) is susceptible to superior vena cava (SVC) injury and can be performed in the operating room (OR) or electrophysiology lab via a mechanical device or laser-powered extraction. This study reflects a contemporary experience of mechanical right-left rotational extraction by cardiac surgeons in the OR.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective single-center review of adult (age ≥18 years) TLE cases performed by cardiac surgeons between 2019 and 2021. Leads were extracted via a transvenous mechanical right-left controlled-rotation system in the OR under general anesthesia with transesophageal echocardiographic guidance. Procedural success was defined as complete extraction of all leads without major complications, based on the Heart Rhythm Society's 2017 guidelines.

Results

A total of 210 leads were extracted from 104 patients, including 72 males (69%). The mean patient age was 63.8 ± 16.7 years, and 26 patients (25%) had undergone prior sternotomy. The most common indication for CIED extraction was infection (69%; n = 72). Removed CIEDs included single-chamber defibrillators (46%; n = 48), pacemakers (33%; n = 34), and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices (21%; n = 22). The mean age of the oldest extracted lead by patient was 9.79 ± 7.25 years. Procedural success was obtained in 95% of cases (99/104). The remaining cases included distal lead fracture (n = 3), inferior vena cava laceration necessitating sternotomy (n = 1), and tricuspid valve damage requiring delayed valve replacement (n = 1). There were zero SVC injuries, and procedure-related mortality was 0%.

Conclusions

Mechanical, controlled-rotation TLE is effective and can be performed safely without SVC injury. TLE by cardiac surgeons in the OR enables rapid conversion to sternotomy in the event of major complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Total aortic arch replacement versus proximal aortic repair for acute type a aortic dissection: A single-center 30-year experience External validation of the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A score in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection Distal anastomotic new entry tears and aortic remodeling following type A dissection repair: A systematic review Aortic valve repair in a middle-income country: Exceptional outcomes and mid-term results Tricuspid valve replacement with bioprostheses: Which type fits best?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1