MRI-derived radiomics models for prediction of Ki-67 index status in meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Clinical Imaging Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110436
Nima Broomand Lomer , Fattaneh Khalaj , Hamed Ghorani , Mohammad Mohammadi , Delaram J. Ghadimi , Sina Zakavi , Mahshad Afsharzadeh , Houman Sotoudeh
{"title":"MRI-derived radiomics models for prediction of Ki-67 index status in meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Nima Broomand Lomer ,&nbsp;Fattaneh Khalaj ,&nbsp;Hamed Ghorani ,&nbsp;Mohammad Mohammadi ,&nbsp;Delaram J. Ghadimi ,&nbsp;Sina Zakavi ,&nbsp;Mahshad Afsharzadeh ,&nbsp;Houman Sotoudeh","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The Ki-67 marker reflects tumor proliferation and correlates with meningioma prognosis. Here we aim to evaluate the performance of MRI-derived radiomics for Ki-67 index prediction in meningiomas.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>After a comprehensive search in Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, data extraction and risk of bias assessment was performed. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios (PLR), negative likelihood ratios (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were computed. The summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve was generated and area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Separate meta-analyses were conducted for radiomics models and combined models. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic, and subgroup analysis was performed to identify potential sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was carried out to detect possible outliers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven studies were included, with six studies analyzed for radiomics model and four for combined model. For radiomics model, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 67 %, 82 %, 8.61, 3.54, 0.43, and 0.79, respectively. For combined model, pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 78 %, 78 %, 12.19, 3.47, 0.30, and 0.79, respectively. Sensitivity analysis identified no outliers. In radiomics model, potential sources of heterogeneity included mean age and the application of N4ITK bias correction. For combined model, heterogeneity was influenced by mean age, application of N4ITK bias correction, and the use of external validation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Radiomics shows promising ability to predict the Ki-67 index status in meningioma patients, potentially enhancing clinical decision-making and management strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 110436"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707125000361","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The Ki-67 marker reflects tumor proliferation and correlates with meningioma prognosis. Here we aim to evaluate the performance of MRI-derived radiomics for Ki-67 index prediction in meningiomas.

Methods

After a comprehensive search in Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, data extraction and risk of bias assessment was performed. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios (PLR), negative likelihood ratios (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were computed. The summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve was generated and area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Separate meta-analyses were conducted for radiomics models and combined models. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic, and subgroup analysis was performed to identify potential sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was carried out to detect possible outliers.

Results

Seven studies were included, with six studies analyzed for radiomics model and four for combined model. For radiomics model, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 67 %, 82 %, 8.61, 3.54, 0.43, and 0.79, respectively. For combined model, pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 78 %, 78 %, 12.19, 3.47, 0.30, and 0.79, respectively. Sensitivity analysis identified no outliers. In radiomics model, potential sources of heterogeneity included mean age and the application of N4ITK bias correction. For combined model, heterogeneity was influenced by mean age, application of N4ITK bias correction, and the use of external validation.

Conclusion

Radiomics shows promising ability to predict the Ki-67 index status in meningioma patients, potentially enhancing clinical decision-making and management strategies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测脑膜瘤Ki-67指数状态的mri衍生放射组学模型:系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的Ki-67标志物反映脑膜瘤的增殖及预后。在这里,我们的目的是评估mri衍生放射组学在脑膜瘤中Ki-67指数预测的性能。方法综合检索Web of Science、PubMed、Embase、Scopus等数据库,进行数据提取和偏倚风险评估。计算合并敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)和诊断优势比(DOR)。生成总受试者工作特征(sROC)曲线,并计算曲线下面积(AUC)。分别对放射组学模型和联合模型进行了meta分析。采用I2统计量评估异质性,并进行亚组分析以确定潜在的异质性来源。进行敏感性分析以发现可能的异常值。结果共纳入7项研究,其中放射组学模型分析6项,联合模型分析4项。放射组学模型的敏感性、特异性、PLR、NLR、DOR和AUC分别为67%、82%、8.61、3.54、0.43和0.79。对于联合模型,合并敏感性、特异性、PLR、NLR、DOR和AUC分别为78%、78%、12.19、3.47、0.30和0.79。敏感性分析未发现异常值。在放射组学模型中,潜在的异质性来源包括平均年龄和N4ITK偏差校正的应用。对于联合模型,异质性受平均年龄、N4ITK偏差校正的应用和外部验证的影响。结论放射组学对脑膜瘤患者Ki-67指数的预测具有重要意义,可为脑膜瘤患者的临床决策和治疗提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Imaging
Clinical Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
265
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include: -Body Imaging- Breast Imaging- Cardiothoracic Imaging- Imaging Physics and Informatics- Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine- Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging- Neuroradiology- Practice, Policy & Education- Pediatric Imaging- Vascular and Interventional Radiology
期刊最新文献
Contents Comment on "Limited performance of ChatGPT-4v and ChatGPT-4o in image-based core radiology cases". Comment on “Classifying the clinical significance of common breast pain symptoms using a large language model, ChatGPT (GPT-4)” Comment on “Diagnostic accuracy and limitations of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating breast tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis” Comment on 'Limited performance of ChatGPT-4v and ChatGPT-4o in image-based core radiology cases'.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1