Nima Broomand Lomer , Fattaneh Khalaj , Hamed Ghorani , Mohammad Mohammadi , Delaram J. Ghadimi , Sina Zakavi , Mahshad Afsharzadeh , Houman Sotoudeh
{"title":"MRI-derived radiomics models for prediction of Ki-67 index status in meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Nima Broomand Lomer , Fattaneh Khalaj , Hamed Ghorani , Mohammad Mohammadi , Delaram J. Ghadimi , Sina Zakavi , Mahshad Afsharzadeh , Houman Sotoudeh","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The Ki-67 marker reflects tumor proliferation and correlates with meningioma prognosis. Here we aim to evaluate the performance of MRI-derived radiomics for Ki-67 index prediction in meningiomas.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>After a comprehensive search in Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, data extraction and risk of bias assessment was performed. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios (PLR), negative likelihood ratios (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were computed. The summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve was generated and area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Separate meta-analyses were conducted for radiomics models and combined models. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic, and subgroup analysis was performed to identify potential sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was carried out to detect possible outliers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven studies were included, with six studies analyzed for radiomics model and four for combined model. For radiomics model, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 67 %, 82 %, 8.61, 3.54, 0.43, and 0.79, respectively. For combined model, pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 78 %, 78 %, 12.19, 3.47, 0.30, and 0.79, respectively. Sensitivity analysis identified no outliers. In radiomics model, potential sources of heterogeneity included mean age and the application of N4ITK bias correction. For combined model, heterogeneity was influenced by mean age, application of N4ITK bias correction, and the use of external validation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Radiomics shows promising ability to predict the Ki-67 index status in meningioma patients, potentially enhancing clinical decision-making and management strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 110436"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707125000361","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
The Ki-67 marker reflects tumor proliferation and correlates with meningioma prognosis. Here we aim to evaluate the performance of MRI-derived radiomics for Ki-67 index prediction in meningiomas.
Methods
After a comprehensive search in Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, data extraction and risk of bias assessment was performed. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios (PLR), negative likelihood ratios (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were computed. The summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve was generated and area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Separate meta-analyses were conducted for radiomics models and combined models. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic, and subgroup analysis was performed to identify potential sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was carried out to detect possible outliers.
Results
Seven studies were included, with six studies analyzed for radiomics model and four for combined model. For radiomics model, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 67 %, 82 %, 8.61, 3.54, 0.43, and 0.79, respectively. For combined model, pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 78 %, 78 %, 12.19, 3.47, 0.30, and 0.79, respectively. Sensitivity analysis identified no outliers. In radiomics model, potential sources of heterogeneity included mean age and the application of N4ITK bias correction. For combined model, heterogeneity was influenced by mean age, application of N4ITK bias correction, and the use of external validation.
Conclusion
Radiomics shows promising ability to predict the Ki-67 index status in meningioma patients, potentially enhancing clinical decision-making and management strategies.
目的Ki-67标志物反映脑膜瘤的增殖及预后。在这里,我们的目的是评估mri衍生放射组学在脑膜瘤中Ki-67指数预测的性能。方法综合检索Web of Science、PubMed、Embase、Scopus等数据库,进行数据提取和偏倚风险评估。计算合并敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)和诊断优势比(DOR)。生成总受试者工作特征(sROC)曲线,并计算曲线下面积(AUC)。分别对放射组学模型和联合模型进行了meta分析。采用I2统计量评估异质性,并进行亚组分析以确定潜在的异质性来源。进行敏感性分析以发现可能的异常值。结果共纳入7项研究,其中放射组学模型分析6项,联合模型分析4项。放射组学模型的敏感性、特异性、PLR、NLR、DOR和AUC分别为67%、82%、8.61、3.54、0.43和0.79。对于联合模型,合并敏感性、特异性、PLR、NLR、DOR和AUC分别为78%、78%、12.19、3.47、0.30和0.79。敏感性分析未发现异常值。在放射组学模型中,潜在的异质性来源包括平均年龄和N4ITK偏差校正的应用。对于联合模型,异质性受平均年龄、N4ITK偏差校正的应用和外部验证的影响。结论放射组学对脑膜瘤患者Ki-67指数的预测具有重要意义,可为脑膜瘤患者的临床决策和治疗提供参考。
期刊介绍:
The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include:
-Body Imaging-
Breast Imaging-
Cardiothoracic Imaging-
Imaging Physics and Informatics-
Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine-
Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging-
Neuroradiology-
Practice, Policy & Education-
Pediatric Imaging-
Vascular and Interventional Radiology