Association between glycation gap and impaired cardiorespiratory fitness: evidence from American adults.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS BMC Cardiovascular Disorders Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1186/s12872-025-04578-y
Min Fei, Bo Wu, Jiabin Tu, Hongkui Chen, Yansong Guo
{"title":"Association between glycation gap and impaired cardiorespiratory fitness: evidence from American adults.","authors":"Min Fei, Bo Wu, Jiabin Tu, Hongkui Chen, Yansong Guo","doi":"10.1186/s12872-025-04578-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a critical indicator of overall health, while the glycation gap (G-Gap) emerges as a potential novel biomarker for metabolic and cardiovascular risk assessment. However, the relationship between G-Gap and CRF remains incompletely understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the association between glycation gap and impaired CRF, and evaluate its potential as an early health risk indicator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 1999-2004), we conducted a comprehensive analysis of 3,818 adult participants. G-Gap was calculated by standardizing glycated albumin (GA) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, comparing actual and predicted HbA1c values. Cardiorespiratory fitness was assessed through maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max), with impaired CRF defined as performance below the 20th percentile for gender and age-specific thresholds. Multivariate logistic regression models were employed, adjusting for demographic characteristics, laboratory parameters, and potential confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In unadjusted models, For every 1 increase in G-Gap as a continuous variable, the chance of CRF damage increased by 65% (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.29-2.11). After comprehensive covariate adjustment, the association remained statistically significant, with odds ratios of 1.87 (95% CI 1.41-2.49) in partially adjusted and 1.41 (95% CI 1.01-1.98) in fully adjusted models. Quartile analysis revealed significantly higher risks of impaired CRF in the third and fourth G-Gap quartiles compared to the first quartile.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates an association between higher G-Gap values and an increased likelihood of impaired CRF.</p>","PeriodicalId":9195,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11840999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-025-04578-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a critical indicator of overall health, while the glycation gap (G-Gap) emerges as a potential novel biomarker for metabolic and cardiovascular risk assessment. However, the relationship between G-Gap and CRF remains incompletely understood.

Objective: To investigate the association between glycation gap and impaired CRF, and evaluate its potential as an early health risk indicator.

Methods: Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 1999-2004), we conducted a comprehensive analysis of 3,818 adult participants. G-Gap was calculated by standardizing glycated albumin (GA) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, comparing actual and predicted HbA1c values. Cardiorespiratory fitness was assessed through maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max), with impaired CRF defined as performance below the 20th percentile for gender and age-specific thresholds. Multivariate logistic regression models were employed, adjusting for demographic characteristics, laboratory parameters, and potential confounding factors.

Results: In unadjusted models, For every 1 increase in G-Gap as a continuous variable, the chance of CRF damage increased by 65% (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.29-2.11). After comprehensive covariate adjustment, the association remained statistically significant, with odds ratios of 1.87 (95% CI 1.41-2.49) in partially adjusted and 1.41 (95% CI 1.01-1.98) in fully adjusted models. Quartile analysis revealed significantly higher risks of impaired CRF in the third and fourth G-Gap quartiles compared to the first quartile.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates an association between higher G-Gap values and an increased likelihood of impaired CRF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
480
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the heart and circulatory system, as well as related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and controlled trials.
期刊最新文献
Adipokine isthmin-1 is a potential predictor of abnormal urine Na+ excretion and insulin resistance for primary hypertension. Effective discrimination of wide QRS complex tachycardia with a new algorithm - the Prelocalization Series Algorithm. Evaluation of the clinical value of CCTA as the preferred screening method in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. A nomogram to predict congestive heart failure in patients with acute kidney injury: a retrospective study based on the MIMIC-III database. Association between stress hyperglycemia ratio and contrast-induced nephropathy in ACS patients undergoing PCI: a retrospective cohort study from the MIMIC-IV database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1