Min Fei, Bo Wu, Jiabin Tu, Hongkui Chen, Yansong Guo
{"title":"Association between glycation gap and impaired cardiorespiratory fitness: evidence from American adults.","authors":"Min Fei, Bo Wu, Jiabin Tu, Hongkui Chen, Yansong Guo","doi":"10.1186/s12872-025-04578-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a critical indicator of overall health, while the glycation gap (G-Gap) emerges as a potential novel biomarker for metabolic and cardiovascular risk assessment. However, the relationship between G-Gap and CRF remains incompletely understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the association between glycation gap and impaired CRF, and evaluate its potential as an early health risk indicator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 1999-2004), we conducted a comprehensive analysis of 3,818 adult participants. G-Gap was calculated by standardizing glycated albumin (GA) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, comparing actual and predicted HbA1c values. Cardiorespiratory fitness was assessed through maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max), with impaired CRF defined as performance below the 20th percentile for gender and age-specific thresholds. Multivariate logistic regression models were employed, adjusting for demographic characteristics, laboratory parameters, and potential confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In unadjusted models, For every 1 increase in G-Gap as a continuous variable, the chance of CRF damage increased by 65% (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.29-2.11). After comprehensive covariate adjustment, the association remained statistically significant, with odds ratios of 1.87 (95% CI 1.41-2.49) in partially adjusted and 1.41 (95% CI 1.01-1.98) in fully adjusted models. Quartile analysis revealed significantly higher risks of impaired CRF in the third and fourth G-Gap quartiles compared to the first quartile.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates an association between higher G-Gap values and an increased likelihood of impaired CRF.</p>","PeriodicalId":9195,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11840999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-025-04578-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a critical indicator of overall health, while the glycation gap (G-Gap) emerges as a potential novel biomarker for metabolic and cardiovascular risk assessment. However, the relationship between G-Gap and CRF remains incompletely understood.
Objective: To investigate the association between glycation gap and impaired CRF, and evaluate its potential as an early health risk indicator.
Methods: Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 1999-2004), we conducted a comprehensive analysis of 3,818 adult participants. G-Gap was calculated by standardizing glycated albumin (GA) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, comparing actual and predicted HbA1c values. Cardiorespiratory fitness was assessed through maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max), with impaired CRF defined as performance below the 20th percentile for gender and age-specific thresholds. Multivariate logistic regression models were employed, adjusting for demographic characteristics, laboratory parameters, and potential confounding factors.
Results: In unadjusted models, For every 1 increase in G-Gap as a continuous variable, the chance of CRF damage increased by 65% (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.29-2.11). After comprehensive covariate adjustment, the association remained statistically significant, with odds ratios of 1.87 (95% CI 1.41-2.49) in partially adjusted and 1.41 (95% CI 1.01-1.98) in fully adjusted models. Quartile analysis revealed significantly higher risks of impaired CRF in the third and fourth G-Gap quartiles compared to the first quartile.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates an association between higher G-Gap values and an increased likelihood of impaired CRF.
背景:心肺适能(CRF)是整体健康的重要指标,而糖基化差距(G-Gap)成为代谢和心血管风险评估的潜在新型生物标志物。然而,G-Gap与CRF之间的关系尚不完全清楚。目的:探讨糖基化间隙与CRF受损的关系,并评价其作为早期健康风险指标的潜力。方法:利用1999-2004年国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)的数据,对3,818名成年参与者进行了综合分析。通过标准化糖化白蛋白(GA)和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平,比较实际值和预测值来计算G-Gap。通过最大摄氧量(VO2 max)评估心肺健康,CRF受损定义为表现低于性别和年龄特定阈值的第20百分位数。采用多元逻辑回归模型,调整人口统计学特征、实验室参数和潜在的混杂因素。结果:在未调整的模型中,作为连续变量的G-Gap每增加1,CRF损伤的机会增加65% (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.29-2.11)。综合协变量调整后,相关性仍然具有统计学意义,部分调整模型的比值比为1.87 (95% CI 1.41-2.49),完全调整模型的比值比为1.41 (95% CI 1.01-1.98)。四分位数分析显示,与第一个四分位数相比,第三和第四个G-Gap四分位数的CRF受损风险明显更高。结论:本研究表明高G-Gap值与CRF受损可能性增加之间存在关联。
期刊介绍:
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the heart and circulatory system, as well as related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and controlled trials.