Pathology-based deep learning features for predicting basal and luminal subtypes in bladder cancer.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY BMC Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-13688-x
Zongtai Zheng, Fazhong Dai, Ji Liu, Yongqiang Zhang, Zhenwei Wang, Bangqi Wang, Xiaofu Qiu
{"title":"Pathology-based deep learning features for predicting basal and luminal subtypes in bladder cancer.","authors":"Zongtai Zheng, Fazhong Dai, Ji Liu, Yongqiang Zhang, Zhenwei Wang, Bangqi Wang, Xiaofu Qiu","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-13688-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bladder cancer (BLCA) exists a profound molecular diversity, with basal and luminal subtypes having different prognostic and therapeutic outcomes. Traditional methods for molecular subtyping are often time-consuming and resource-intensive. This study aims to develop machine learning models using deep learning features from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole-slide images (WSIs) to predict basal and luminal subtypes in BLCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RNA sequencing data and clinical outcomes were downloaded from seven public BLCA databases, including TCGA, GEO datasets, and the IMvigor210C cohort, to assess the prognostic value of BLCA molecular subtypes. WSIs from TCGA were used to construct and validate the machine learning models, while WSIs from Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital (STPH) and The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University (GD2H) were used as external validations. Deep learning models were trained to obtained tumor patches within WSIs. WSI level deep learning features were extracted from tumor patches based on the RetCCL model. Support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and logistic regression (LR) were developed using these features to classify basal and luminal subtypes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Kaplan-Meier survival and prognostic meta-analyses showed that basal BLCA patients had significantly worse overall survival compared to luminal BLCA patients (hazard ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval: 1.25-1.73, P < 0.001). The LR model based on tumor patch features selected by Resnet50 model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 in the internal validation set, and 0.81 and 0.64 in the external validation sets from STPH and GD2H, respectively. This model outperformed both junior and senior pathologists in the differentiation of basal and luminal subtypes (AUC: 0.85, accuracy: 74%, sensitivity: 66%, specificity: 82%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed the efficacy of machine learning models in predicting the basal and luminal subtypes of BLCA based on the extraction of deep learning features from tumor patches in H&E-stained WSIs. The performance of the LR model suggests that the integration of AI tools into the diagnostic process could significantly enhance the accuracy of molecular subtyping, thereby potentially informing personalized treatment strategies for BLCA patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"310"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13688-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bladder cancer (BLCA) exists a profound molecular diversity, with basal and luminal subtypes having different prognostic and therapeutic outcomes. Traditional methods for molecular subtyping are often time-consuming and resource-intensive. This study aims to develop machine learning models using deep learning features from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole-slide images (WSIs) to predict basal and luminal subtypes in BLCA.

Methods: RNA sequencing data and clinical outcomes were downloaded from seven public BLCA databases, including TCGA, GEO datasets, and the IMvigor210C cohort, to assess the prognostic value of BLCA molecular subtypes. WSIs from TCGA were used to construct and validate the machine learning models, while WSIs from Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital (STPH) and The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University (GD2H) were used as external validations. Deep learning models were trained to obtained tumor patches within WSIs. WSI level deep learning features were extracted from tumor patches based on the RetCCL model. Support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and logistic regression (LR) were developed using these features to classify basal and luminal subtypes.

Results: Kaplan-Meier survival and prognostic meta-analyses showed that basal BLCA patients had significantly worse overall survival compared to luminal BLCA patients (hazard ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval: 1.25-1.73, P < 0.001). The LR model based on tumor patch features selected by Resnet50 model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 in the internal validation set, and 0.81 and 0.64 in the external validation sets from STPH and GD2H, respectively. This model outperformed both junior and senior pathologists in the differentiation of basal and luminal subtypes (AUC: 0.85, accuracy: 74%, sensitivity: 66%, specificity: 82%).

Conclusions: This study showed the efficacy of machine learning models in predicting the basal and luminal subtypes of BLCA based on the extraction of deep learning features from tumor patches in H&E-stained WSIs. The performance of the LR model suggests that the integration of AI tools into the diagnostic process could significantly enhance the accuracy of molecular subtyping, thereby potentially informing personalized treatment strategies for BLCA patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于病理的深度学习特征预测膀胱癌基底和腔内亚型。
背景:膀胱癌(BLCA)存在着深刻的分子多样性,基底亚型和腔型亚型具有不同的预后和治疗结果。传统的分子分型方法往往耗时且资源密集。本研究旨在利用苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色的全片图像(WSIs)的深度学习特征开发机器学习模型,以预测BLCA的基础和腔内亚型。方法:从TCGA、GEO数据集和IMvigor210C队列等7个BLCA公共数据库下载RNA测序数据和临床结果,评估BLCA分子亚型的预后价值。来自TCGA的wsi用于构建和验证机器学习模型,而来自上海第十人民医院(STPH)和暨南大学附属广东省第二总医院(GD2H)的wsi用于外部验证。训练深度学习模型以获得wsi内的肿瘤斑块。基于RetCCL模型从肿瘤斑块中提取WSI级深度学习特征。利用这些特征开发了支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林(RF)和逻辑回归(LR)来分类基础亚型和腔型亚型。结果:Kaplan-Meier生存和预后荟萃分析显示,基础BLCA患者的总生存率明显低于腔内BLCA患者(风险比= 1.47,95%置信区间:1.25-1.73,P)。结论:本研究显示,基于提取h&e染色WSIs肿瘤斑块的深度学习特征,机器学习模型在预测基础和腔内BLCA亚型方面的有效性。LR模型的表现表明,将人工智能工具整合到诊断过程中可以显著提高分子分型的准确性,从而有可能为BLCA患者的个性化治疗策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Integration of human and mouse single-cell transcriptomes of the developing cerebellum nominates cells-of-origin for group 3 and 4 medulloblastoma. Efficacy and safety of ultra-hypofractionated post-operative radiation therapy for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Geographic and demographic patterns of cervical cancer in Africa using GLOBOCAN 2022. FDG-PET/CT based small volume accelerated immuno chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced NSCLC (PACCELIO) - a randomized, open-label, multicenter phase II trial protocol. The predictive value of the lymphocyte-C-reactive protein ratio for early recurrence in MVI positive HCC patients who underwent postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1