Assessing Patient Preferences and Response to Extended Colonoscopy Intervals in a Colorectal Cancer Surveillance Program.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive Diseases and Sciences Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1007/s10620-025-08925-z
Maddison Dix, Syme Aftab, Graeme P Young, Carlene J Wilson, Kalindra Simpson, Charles Cock, Erin L Symonds
{"title":"Assessing Patient Preferences and Response to Extended Colonoscopy Intervals in a Colorectal Cancer Surveillance Program.","authors":"Maddison Dix, Syme Aftab, Graeme P Young, Carlene J Wilson, Kalindra Simpson, Charles Cock, Erin L Symonds","doi":"10.1007/s10620-025-08925-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) are advised to have surveillance colonoscopies at guideline-recommended intervals to prevent cancer development. As more recent clinical guideline updates have extended colonoscopy intervals for those with lower risk findings, effective communication of these surveillance changes is essential for ensuring patient acceptance.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate patient preferences for surveillance colonoscopy frequency, and responses to an extended colonoscopy interval.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population included individuals at increased risk for CRC who were enrolled in a South Australian surveillance program. Preferences for surveillance frequency were collected via survey, and responses to a letter implementing a guideline-recommended colonoscopy interval change from 3 to 5 years were obtained from clinical data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While 46.6% (n = 186/399) of survey respondents preferred a more frequent colonoscopy interval than their current clinical recommendation, 80.4% indicated that they would be comfortable following whatever their specialist recommends. In practice, only 2.9% (n = 11/380) of patients queried the extended surveillance colonoscopy interval with the clinical team.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Specialist involvement can increase the acceptance of extended colonoscopy intervals, despite patient preferences for more frequent procedures. Therefore, the implementation of updated surveillance guidelines should be communicated to patients with specialist endorsement.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-08925-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) are advised to have surveillance colonoscopies at guideline-recommended intervals to prevent cancer development. As more recent clinical guideline updates have extended colonoscopy intervals for those with lower risk findings, effective communication of these surveillance changes is essential for ensuring patient acceptance.

Aims: To evaluate patient preferences for surveillance colonoscopy frequency, and responses to an extended colonoscopy interval.

Methods: The study population included individuals at increased risk for CRC who were enrolled in a South Australian surveillance program. Preferences for surveillance frequency were collected via survey, and responses to a letter implementing a guideline-recommended colonoscopy interval change from 3 to 5 years were obtained from clinical data.

Results: While 46.6% (n = 186/399) of survey respondents preferred a more frequent colonoscopy interval than their current clinical recommendation, 80.4% indicated that they would be comfortable following whatever their specialist recommends. In practice, only 2.9% (n = 11/380) of patients queried the extended surveillance colonoscopy interval with the clinical team.

Conclusions: Specialist involvement can increase the acceptance of extended colonoscopy intervals, despite patient preferences for more frequent procedures. Therefore, the implementation of updated surveillance guidelines should be communicated to patients with specialist endorsement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
期刊最新文献
Mirikizumab in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: Initial Real-World Data in a Population from a Large Tertiary Center. Understanding the Impact of Prior Anti-TNF Exposure on Colectomy Risk in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis. Colonic Diaphragmatic Disease: The Concerning Dark Depths of NSAIDs. Association Between Prior Anti-TNF Exposure and Colectomy in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis. Correction to: Homocysteine Promotes Intestinal Inflammation in Colitis Mice Through the PGE2/STAT3 Signaling Pathway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1