Impact of valvulo-vascular haemodynamics on left ventricular remodelling and the prevalence of discordant moderate aortic stenosis.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1093/ehjci/jeaf021
Mulham Ali, Lionel Tastet, Nils Sofus Borg Mogensen, Axel Diederichsen, Mylène Shen, Marie Arsenault, Jacob Eifer Møller, Kristian Altern Øvrehus, Elisabeth Bédard, Jes Sanddal Lindholt, Jess Lambrechtsen, Flemming Hald Steffensen, Grazina Urbonaviciene, Amal Haujir, Patricia A Pellikka, Philippe Pibarot, Marie-Annick Clavel, Jordi Sanchez Dahl
{"title":"Impact of valvulo-vascular haemodynamics on left ventricular remodelling and the prevalence of discordant moderate aortic stenosis.","authors":"Mulham Ali, Lionel Tastet, Nils Sofus Borg Mogensen, Axel Diederichsen, Mylène Shen, Marie Arsenault, Jacob Eifer Møller, Kristian Altern Øvrehus, Elisabeth Bédard, Jes Sanddal Lindholt, Jess Lambrechtsen, Flemming Hald Steffensen, Grazina Urbonaviciene, Amal Haujir, Patricia A Pellikka, Philippe Pibarot, Marie-Annick Clavel, Jordi Sanchez Dahl","doi":"10.1093/ehjci/jeaf021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to describe the prevalence of discordant mild/moderate aortic stenosis (AS) in a population-based study and to identify the mechanisms that lead to reduced stroke volume (SV) and discordant moderate AS.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Discordant high-gradient (HG)-mild AS, defined as AVA > 1.5 cm2 and mean pressure gradient (MG) of 20-40 mmHg, and discordant low-gradient (LG) moderate AS, defined as AVA 1.0-1.5 cm2 and MG < 20 mmHg, were assessed in 883 individuals from the DANCAVAS screening study with aortic valve calcification and 257 individuals form the PROGRESSA study excluding those with left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction < 50%. In the DANCAVAS cohort, 150 men had mild/moderate AS of which 34% had discordance between MG and AVA, representing 66% with moderate AS. Among 262 patients in the combined cohort, 39% had discordant LG-moderate AS and 6% discordant HG-mild AS. Compared with concordant mild and moderate AS, individuals with discordant LG-moderate AS were more likely to present with LV concentric remodelling geometry (26 vs. 33 vs. 45%, P < 0.001), increased valvulo-arterial impedance (3.3 ± 0.7 vs. 3.6 ± 0.5 vs. 4.1 ± 0.7 mmHg/mL/m2, P < 0.001), and reduced systemic arterial compliance (SAC) (0.74 ± 0.22 vs. 0.81 ± 0.22 vs. 0.64 ± 0.18 mL/m2/mmHg, P < 0.001). Factors associated with SV index were relative wall thickness, LV end-diastolic diameter index, SAC, and LV remodelling pattern.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Discordant moderate AS is common, accounting for two-thirds of patients with moderate AS in the general male population. Patients with discordant LG-moderate AS have predominantly a concentric remodelling pattern with reduced SV. Reduced SV index was associated with signs of reduced vascular compliance, suggesting that altered vascular properties drive differences in remodelling patterns and discordant moderate AS.</p>","PeriodicalId":12026,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"686-694"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaf021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aims to describe the prevalence of discordant mild/moderate aortic stenosis (AS) in a population-based study and to identify the mechanisms that lead to reduced stroke volume (SV) and discordant moderate AS.

Methods and results: Discordant high-gradient (HG)-mild AS, defined as AVA > 1.5 cm2 and mean pressure gradient (MG) of 20-40 mmHg, and discordant low-gradient (LG) moderate AS, defined as AVA 1.0-1.5 cm2 and MG < 20 mmHg, were assessed in 883 individuals from the DANCAVAS screening study with aortic valve calcification and 257 individuals form the PROGRESSA study excluding those with left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction < 50%. In the DANCAVAS cohort, 150 men had mild/moderate AS of which 34% had discordance between MG and AVA, representing 66% with moderate AS. Among 262 patients in the combined cohort, 39% had discordant LG-moderate AS and 6% discordant HG-mild AS. Compared with concordant mild and moderate AS, individuals with discordant LG-moderate AS were more likely to present with LV concentric remodelling geometry (26 vs. 33 vs. 45%, P < 0.001), increased valvulo-arterial impedance (3.3 ± 0.7 vs. 3.6 ± 0.5 vs. 4.1 ± 0.7 mmHg/mL/m2, P < 0.001), and reduced systemic arterial compliance (SAC) (0.74 ± 0.22 vs. 0.81 ± 0.22 vs. 0.64 ± 0.18 mL/m2/mmHg, P < 0.001). Factors associated with SV index were relative wall thickness, LV end-diastolic diameter index, SAC, and LV remodelling pattern.

Conclusion: Discordant moderate AS is common, accounting for two-thirds of patients with moderate AS in the general male population. Patients with discordant LG-moderate AS have predominantly a concentric remodelling pattern with reduced SV. Reduced SV index was associated with signs of reduced vascular compliance, suggesting that altered vascular properties drive differences in remodelling patterns and discordant moderate AS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瓣膜-血管血流动力学对左室重构和不一致中度主动脉狭窄的影响。
目的:本研究旨在描述一项基于人群的研究中不协调轻度/中度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)的患病率,并确定导致卒中容量减少(SV)和不协调中度AS的机制。方法和结果:不一致的高梯度(HG)-轻度AS,定义为AVA > 1.5 cm2,平均压力梯度(MG) 20-40 mmHg,不一致的低梯度(LG)中度AS,定义为AVA 1.0-1.5 cm2, MG < 20 mmHg,来自DANCAVAS筛查研究的883例主动脉瓣钙化患者和来自PROGRESSA研究的257例患者(不包括左室射血分数< 50%的患者)进行评估。在DANCAVAS队列中,150名男性患有轻度/中度AS,其中34%在MG和AVA之间存在不一致,占中度AS的66%。在联合队列的262例患者中,39%的患者存在不一致的低阶-中度AS, 6%的患者存在不一致的高阶-轻度AS。与和谐型轻、中度AS相比,不和谐型轻、中度AS患者更容易出现左室同心重构几何(26 vs 33 vs 45%, P < 0.001),瓣膜动脉阻抗增加(3.3±0.7 vs 3.6±0.5 vs 4.1±0.7 mmHg/mL/m2, P < 0.001),全身动脉顺应性(SAC)降低(0.74±0.22 vs 0.81±0.22 vs 0.64±0.18 mL/m2/mmHg, P < 0.001)。与SV指数相关的因素有相对壁厚、左室舒张末期内径指数、SAC和左室重构模式。结论:不协调型中度AS较为常见,占一般男性中度AS患者的三分之二。不一致的低-中度AS患者主要有同心重构模式,SV减少。SV指数降低与血管顺应性降低的迹象相关,表明血管特性的改变驱动了重塑模式的差异和不一致的中度AS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
708
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging is a monthly international peer reviewed journal dealing with Cardiovascular Imaging. It is an official publication of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical from all areas of cardiovascular imaging including echocardiography, magnetic resonance, computed tomography, nuclear and invasive imaging. A range of article types will be considered, including original research, reviews, editorials, image focus, letters and recommendation papers from relevant groups of the European Society of Cardiology. In addition it provides a forum for the exchange of information on all aspects of cardiovascular imaging.
期刊最新文献
A Dissecting Pulmonary Aneurysm Complicating Eisenmenger Syndrome. Natural Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Mimicking Thrombus on CT Imaging. Beyond Valves: Reframing Multiple Valvular Heart Disease Through Integrated Myocardial and Haemodynamic Assessment. Beyond individual valve lesions: integrated haemodynamic and myocardial assessment in multiple valvular heart disease. Sex-specific remodelling of the aortic valve in aortic stenosis: Is fibrosis the missing piece?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1