Erector spinae plane block with liposomal bupivacaine for post-cesarean analgesia

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.70027
Sara Feldman, Romel J. Holmes Jr, Matthew Fuller, Ashraf S. Habib
{"title":"Erector spinae plane block with liposomal bupivacaine for post-cesarean analgesia","authors":"Sara Feldman,&nbsp;Romel J. Holmes Jr,&nbsp;Matthew Fuller,&nbsp;Ashraf S. Habib","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of the current study was to assess the analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block with liposomal bupivacaine in women undergoing cesarean delivery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We prospectively enrolled patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal or combined spinal epidural anesthesia. At the end of surgery, a bilateral ESPB was performed. All patients received a standardized intraoperative and postoperative multimodal analgesic regimen. Prospectively enrolled patients were matched with historical controls who received the same multimodal analgesic regimen but no truncal blocks. The primary outcome was postoperative oxycodone consumption 0–48 h. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption through 24 h, time to first opioid rescue, area under the curve of visual analog scale pain intensity scores through 48 h, need for treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting and pruritus, and proportion of opioid-free patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty prospectively enrolled patients were matched with 120 historical controls. There were no significant differences between the groups in 48-h oxycodone consumption (median, 12.5 [interquartile range (IQR), 5.0–40.0] vs. 25.0 [IQR, 3.8–50.0 mg], <i>P</i> = 0.38). There were also no significant differences between the groups in any of the secondary outcomes, but the area under the curve for pain scores 0–48 h was significantly lower in the ESPB group compared with the historical controls (median, 115 [IQR, 26–151] vs. 140 [IQR, 86–180], <i>P</i> = 0.007).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>ESPB with liposomal bupivacaine did not reduce postoperative opioid consumption but was associated with reduced pain scores compared with historical controls not receiving a truncal block. Future studies with a larger sample size are needed to further assess whether ESPB provides clinically significant benefit in this patient population.</p>\n \n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> The study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov on 12/09/2022 (NCT05664958, principal investigator Ashraf S. Habib https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05664958).</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":"170 1","pages":"489-495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijgo.70027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the current study was to assess the analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block with liposomal bupivacaine in women undergoing cesarean delivery.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal or combined spinal epidural anesthesia. At the end of surgery, a bilateral ESPB was performed. All patients received a standardized intraoperative and postoperative multimodal analgesic regimen. Prospectively enrolled patients were matched with historical controls who received the same multimodal analgesic regimen but no truncal blocks. The primary outcome was postoperative oxycodone consumption 0–48 h. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption through 24 h, time to first opioid rescue, area under the curve of visual analog scale pain intensity scores through 48 h, need for treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting and pruritus, and proportion of opioid-free patients.

Results

Thirty prospectively enrolled patients were matched with 120 historical controls. There were no significant differences between the groups in 48-h oxycodone consumption (median, 12.5 [interquartile range (IQR), 5.0–40.0] vs. 25.0 [IQR, 3.8–50.0 mg], P = 0.38). There were also no significant differences between the groups in any of the secondary outcomes, but the area under the curve for pain scores 0–48 h was significantly lower in the ESPB group compared with the historical controls (median, 115 [IQR, 26–151] vs. 140 [IQR, 86–180], P = 0.007).

Conclusion

ESPB with liposomal bupivacaine did not reduce postoperative opioid consumption but was associated with reduced pain scores compared with historical controls not receiving a truncal block. Future studies with a larger sample size are needed to further assess whether ESPB provides clinically significant benefit in this patient population.

Trial Registration: The study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov on 12/09/2022 (NCT05664958, principal investigator Ashraf S. Habib https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05664958).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布比卡因脂质体阻滞用于剖宫产后镇痛。
目的:本研究的目的是评估布比卡因脂质体在剖宫产妇女中的镇痛效果。方法:我们前瞻性地招募了在脊髓或联合脊髓硬膜外麻醉下择期剖宫产的患者。手术结束时,行双侧ESPB。所有患者均接受标准化的术中及术后多模式镇痛方案。前瞻性纳入的患者与既往对照组相匹配,对照组接受相同的多模式镇痛方案,但未进行截断。主要终点为术后0-48 h的氧可酮消耗。次要结局包括24 h阿片类药物的消耗、到第一次阿片类药物救援的时间、48 h视觉模拟量表疼痛强度评分曲线下面积、术后恶心呕吐和瘙痒的治疗需要以及无阿片类药物患者的比例。结果:30名前瞻性入组患者与120名历史对照组相匹配。两组48小时羟考酮摄食量差异无统计学意义(中位数12.5[四分位间距(IQR), 5.0-40.0] vs. 25.0 [IQR, 3.8-50.0 mg], P = 0.38)。两组间的次要结果也无显著差异,但ESPB组疼痛评分0-48 h的曲线下面积明显低于历史对照组(中位数为115 [IQR, 26-151]对140 [IQR, 86-180], P = 0.007)。结论:与未接受截骨阻滞的历史对照组相比,使用布比卡因脂质体的ESPB并没有减少术后阿片类药物的消耗,但与疼痛评分降低有关。未来需要更大样本量的研究来进一步评估ESPB是否在该患者群体中提供临床显著的益处。试验注册:该研究已于2022年9月12日在clinicaltrials.gov上注册(NCT05664958,首席研究员Ashraf S. Habib https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05664958)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
The association between epidural analgesia and perineal injury in primiparous women: A propensity score-matched cohort study. Risks of misuse and overuse of Kegel exercises in postpartum and postmenopausal urinary incontinence. Fluorescein colposcopy-A more specific diagnostic method for detection of high-grade cervical precancer lesions than acetic acid. Efficacy and safety of fractional microablative radiofrequency versus topical estriol in treating genitourinary syndrome of menopause: A pilot study. Oxytocin versus carbetocin for preventing postpartum hemorrhage in patients with polyhydramnios during cesarean delivery: A retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1