Effects of a high-fiber, high-fruit and high-vegetable, low-fat dietary intervention on the rectal tissue microbiome.

IF 7.2 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1093/jnci/djaf034
Doratha A Byrd, Maria Gomez, Stephanie Hogue, Yunhu Wan, Ana Ortega-Villa, Andrew Warner, Casey Dagnall, Kristine Jones, Belynda Hicks, Paul Albert, Gwen Murphy, Rashmi Sinha, Emily Vogtmann
{"title":"Effects of a high-fiber, high-fruit and high-vegetable, low-fat dietary intervention on the rectal tissue microbiome.","authors":"Doratha A Byrd, Maria Gomez, Stephanie Hogue, Yunhu Wan, Ana Ortega-Villa, Andrew Warner, Casey Dagnall, Kristine Jones, Belynda Hicks, Paul Albert, Gwen Murphy, Rashmi Sinha, Emily Vogtmann","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djaf034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emerging evidence suggests that bacteria residing in colorectal tissue are plausibly associated with colorectal cancer. Prior studies investigated the effects of dietary interventions on the fecal microbiome, but few assessed colorectal tissue microbiome endpoints. We investigated the effects of a high-fiber, high-fruit, high-vegetable, and low-fat dietary intervention on the rectal tissue microbiome in the Polyp Prevention Trial (PPT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PPT is a 4-year randomized clinical trial with intervention goals of consuming (1) at least 18 g of fiber per 1000 kcal/day; (2) at least 3.5 servings of fruits and vegetables per 1000 kcal/day; and (3) no more than 20% of kcal/day from fat. Using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing, we characterized bacteria in rectal biopsies collected at baseline and the end of years 1 and 4 (n = 233 in intervention arm and n = 222 in control arm). We estimated effects of the intervention on alpha and beta diversity and relative abundance of a priori-selected bacteria using repeated-measures linear mixed-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention did not statistically significantly modify rectal tissue alpha diversity. Compared with the control arm, relative abundance of a priori-selected Porphyromonas (absolute intervention effects [standard errors] at T1 vs T0 = -0.24 [0.07] and T4 vs T0 = -0.12 [0.07]; P = .004) and Prevotella (absolute intervention effects at T1 vs T0 = -0.40 [0.14] and at T4 vs T0 = -0.32 [0.15]; P = .01) were more strongly decreased in the intervention arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PPT intervention did not influence rectal tissue microbiome diversity or the relative abundance of most bacteria, except for 2 oral-originating bacteria that were previously associated with colorectal cancer presence.</p>","PeriodicalId":14809,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":" ","pages":"1237-1244"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12145913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf034","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emerging evidence suggests that bacteria residing in colorectal tissue are plausibly associated with colorectal cancer. Prior studies investigated the effects of dietary interventions on the fecal microbiome, but few assessed colorectal tissue microbiome endpoints. We investigated the effects of a high-fiber, high-fruit, high-vegetable, and low-fat dietary intervention on the rectal tissue microbiome in the Polyp Prevention Trial (PPT).

Methods: PPT is a 4-year randomized clinical trial with intervention goals of consuming (1) at least 18 g of fiber per 1000 kcal/day; (2) at least 3.5 servings of fruits and vegetables per 1000 kcal/day; and (3) no more than 20% of kcal/day from fat. Using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing, we characterized bacteria in rectal biopsies collected at baseline and the end of years 1 and 4 (n = 233 in intervention arm and n = 222 in control arm). We estimated effects of the intervention on alpha and beta diversity and relative abundance of a priori-selected bacteria using repeated-measures linear mixed-effects models.

Results: The intervention did not statistically significantly modify rectal tissue alpha diversity. Compared with the control arm, relative abundance of a priori-selected Porphyromonas (absolute intervention effects [standard errors] at T1 vs T0 = -0.24 [0.07] and T4 vs T0 = -0.12 [0.07]; P = .004) and Prevotella (absolute intervention effects at T1 vs T0 = -0.40 [0.14] and at T4 vs T0 = -0.32 [0.15]; P = .01) were more strongly decreased in the intervention arm.

Conclusion: The PPT intervention did not influence rectal tissue microbiome diversity or the relative abundance of most bacteria, except for 2 oral-originating bacteria that were previously associated with colorectal cancer presence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高纤维、高水果、高蔬菜、低脂肪饮食干预对直肠组织微生物组的影响。
背景:越来越多的证据表明,居住在结直肠组织中的细菌可能与结直肠癌(CRC)有关。先前的研究调查了饮食干预对粪便微生物组的影响,但很少评估结直肠组织微生物组的终点。在息肉预防试验(PPT)中,我们研究了高纤维、高水果和蔬菜、低脂肪饮食干预对直肠组织微生物组的影响。方法:PPT是一项为期4年的随机临床试验,干预目标为:1)每1000千卡/天摄入≥18克纤维;2)每1000千卡/天≥3.5份水果和蔬菜;3)结果:干预对直肠组织α多样性的影响无统计学意义。与对照组相比,优先选择的卟啉单胞菌的相对丰度(T1 vs T0的绝对干预效应[标准误差]=-0.24 [0.07],T4 vs T0=-0.12 [0.07];P = 0.004)和普雷沃氏菌(T1 vs T0=-0.40[0.14]和T4 vs T0=-0.32[0.15]的绝对干预效应;P = 0.01),在干预组下降更为明显。结论:PPT干预不影响直肠组织微生物组的多样性,也不影响大多数细菌的相对丰度,除了两种先前与结直肠癌存在相关的口腔起源细菌。原始临床试验注册号:NCT00339625。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
203
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the National Cancer Institute is a reputable publication that undergoes a peer-review process. It is available in both print (ISSN: 0027-8874) and online (ISSN: 1460-2105) formats, with 12 issues released annually. The journal's primary aim is to disseminate innovative and important discoveries in the field of cancer research, with specific emphasis on clinical, epidemiologic, behavioral, and health outcomes studies. Authors are encouraged to submit reviews, minireviews, and commentaries. The journal ensures that submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous and expedited review to publish scientifically and medically significant findings in a timely manner.
期刊最新文献
RE: Prostate cancer clinicopathological presentation in South-East Africa during the 2010 decade. Response to Bosland. Early-detection and prevention effects of screening sigmoidoscopy: evidence from randomized trials revisited. Tattoos and risk of cutaneous melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer in France. Current state of mammography-based artificial intelligence for future breast cancer risk prediction: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1