Validity of the Uninjured Limb as a Control for Preoperative Assessment in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Research® Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1002/jor.26057
Ronan Grimandi, Florine Tissier, Marc Garetier, Julien Labban, Romain Gérard, Emmanuelle Courtois-Communier, Christophe Andro, Hélène Bisseriex, François-Xavier Gunepin, Fabrice Rannou, Marie-Agnès Giroux-Metges
{"title":"Validity of the Uninjured Limb as a Control for Preoperative Assessment in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.","authors":"Ronan Grimandi, Florine Tissier, Marc Garetier, Julien Labban, Romain Gérard, Emmanuelle Courtois-Communier, Christophe Andro, Hélène Bisseriex, François-Xavier Gunepin, Fabrice Rannou, Marie-Agnès Giroux-Metges","doi":"10.1002/jor.26057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monitoring muscle atrophy in patients undergoing anterolateral cruciate ligament reconstruction is pivotal for optimizing postoperative recovery. Conventionally, the uninjured contralateral limb serves as the control. However, its relevance in patients with prolonged physical activity hiatus due to knee instability remains uncertain. Our objectives were to compare limbs within a control group by assessing combined force measurements, cross-sectional areas (CSAs), and neuromuscular activation. In addition, we compared the contralateral limb of the surgery group preoperatively to the control group. This prospective controlled study (evidence level 2) included 40 healthy subjects (HG) and 30 patients scheduled for ACL surgery (SG). Both groups underwent identical assessments. The two HG limbs were compared to establish the standard difference for all assessed variables, whereas SG contralateral limb was compared with the mean of the control limbs. For HG, the comparisons between limbs showed no significant differences in muscle strength, CSA area, or electromyographic parameters. Similarly, comparisons between the SG contralateral limb and the mean of HG limbs revealed no significant differences in isometric and dynamic strength for the quadriceps and hamstrings (2.5 ± 0.5 and 2.6 ± 0.9 N.m/kg, and 1.7 ± 0.3 and 1.7 ± 0.4 N.m/kg, respectively). Neuromuscular activation and fatigue patterns were also comparable between groups. CSAs discrepancies were attributed to differences in body mass index between groups. These findings indicate that the contralateral limb in ACL_injured patients is functionally similar to that of healthy controls, supporting its use as a valid reference for monitoring postoperative recovery. Trial Registration: NCT03200678.</p>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.26057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Monitoring muscle atrophy in patients undergoing anterolateral cruciate ligament reconstruction is pivotal for optimizing postoperative recovery. Conventionally, the uninjured contralateral limb serves as the control. However, its relevance in patients with prolonged physical activity hiatus due to knee instability remains uncertain. Our objectives were to compare limbs within a control group by assessing combined force measurements, cross-sectional areas (CSAs), and neuromuscular activation. In addition, we compared the contralateral limb of the surgery group preoperatively to the control group. This prospective controlled study (evidence level 2) included 40 healthy subjects (HG) and 30 patients scheduled for ACL surgery (SG). Both groups underwent identical assessments. The two HG limbs were compared to establish the standard difference for all assessed variables, whereas SG contralateral limb was compared with the mean of the control limbs. For HG, the comparisons between limbs showed no significant differences in muscle strength, CSA area, or electromyographic parameters. Similarly, comparisons between the SG contralateral limb and the mean of HG limbs revealed no significant differences in isometric and dynamic strength for the quadriceps and hamstrings (2.5 ± 0.5 and 2.6 ± 0.9 N.m/kg, and 1.7 ± 0.3 and 1.7 ± 0.4 N.m/kg, respectively). Neuromuscular activation and fatigue patterns were also comparable between groups. CSAs discrepancies were attributed to differences in body mass index between groups. These findings indicate that the contralateral limb in ACL_injured patients is functionally similar to that of healthy controls, supporting its use as a valid reference for monitoring postoperative recovery. Trial Registration: NCT03200678.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将未受伤肢体作为前交叉韧带重建术术前评估的对照的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.
期刊最新文献
Structural Variations of Tendons: A Systematic Search and Narrative Review of Histological Differences Between Tendons, Tendon Regions, Sex, and Age. Assessing Cardiopulmonary Safety of Intramedullary Bone Graft Harvesting: A Comparative Study of the RIA 2 System and the ARA Concept. Impact of Femoral and Tibial Torsion on Patellofemoral Loading in Individuals With Patellofemoral Instability. Effectiveness of Low-Intensity Exercise in Mitigating Active Arthritis Exacerbation in a Mouse Rheumatoid-Arthritis Model. Validity of the Uninjured Limb as a Control for Preoperative Assessment in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1