Factors Affecting the Outcome of Vitrectomy With Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Myopic Foveoschisis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-02-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/joph/2774963
Lie Yang, Jialin Wang, Lu Zhao, Zhuohua Zhou, Yingxiang Huang, Yanling Wang
{"title":"Factors Affecting the Outcome of Vitrectomy With Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Myopic Foveoschisis.","authors":"Lie Yang, Jialin Wang, Lu Zhao, Zhuohua Zhou, Yingxiang Huang, Yanling Wang","doi":"10.1155/joph/2774963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate the short- and long-term effect of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling on visual acuity and macular morphology in myopic foveoschisis (MF) patients and to identify potential prognostic factors. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with MF who underwent PPV with ILM peeling by the same senior fundus surgeon at Beijing Friendship Hospital from January 2016 to December 2022. The peeling was strategically centered on the macular fovea, extending to encompass the superotemporal and inferotemporal vascular arcades. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were conducted to screen out the prognostic factors. <b>Results:</b> 36 eyes of 36 consecutive patients were analyzed in total. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved significantly from 1.10 ± 0.61 logMAR to 0.78 ± 0.58 logMAR (<i>p</i>=0.031). 23 eyes (63.89%) had postoperative BCVA improved ≥ 2 Snellen lines. The mean central fovea thickness (CFT) decreased from 427.14 ± 255.91 μm to 155.85 ± 67.33 μm (<i>p</i> < 0.001). 18 and 16 eyes achieved partial and complete retinal reattachment, respectively, as follows. The twelfth month postoperatively was a threshold to influence the resolution of MF significantly, but it did not affect the visual outcome. Multiple logistic regression showed CFT (OR = 1.007, 95% CI = 1.001, 1.013, <i>p</i> value = 0.034) remained significant to predict the complete retina resolution. For visual acuity, integrated ellipsoid zone (EZ) band (OR = 0.239, 95% CI = 0.073, 0.783, <i>p</i> value = 0.018) might be a significant predictive factor. Subgroup analysis further indicated that in eyes with an intact EZ band, a poorer baseline BCVA was associated with an increase in postoperative BCVA (<i>p</i>=0.015). Conversely, in those with disrupted EZ band, all included factors showed no significant difference. <b>Conclusion:</b> The study observed trends in the recovery pattern of the retina following surgery and suggested potential factors that may be associated with improvements in both visual acuity and retinal reattachment. The findings may offer some guidance to ophthalmic surgeons in considering the timing of surgery, although further research is needed to confirm these trends as definitive predictors.</p>","PeriodicalId":16674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"2025 ","pages":"2774963"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/joph/2774963","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the short- and long-term effect of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling on visual acuity and macular morphology in myopic foveoschisis (MF) patients and to identify potential prognostic factors. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with MF who underwent PPV with ILM peeling by the same senior fundus surgeon at Beijing Friendship Hospital from January 2016 to December 2022. The peeling was strategically centered on the macular fovea, extending to encompass the superotemporal and inferotemporal vascular arcades. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were conducted to screen out the prognostic factors. Results: 36 eyes of 36 consecutive patients were analyzed in total. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved significantly from 1.10 ± 0.61 logMAR to 0.78 ± 0.58 logMAR (p=0.031). 23 eyes (63.89%) had postoperative BCVA improved ≥ 2 Snellen lines. The mean central fovea thickness (CFT) decreased from 427.14 ± 255.91 μm to 155.85 ± 67.33 μm (p < 0.001). 18 and 16 eyes achieved partial and complete retinal reattachment, respectively, as follows. The twelfth month postoperatively was a threshold to influence the resolution of MF significantly, but it did not affect the visual outcome. Multiple logistic regression showed CFT (OR = 1.007, 95% CI = 1.001, 1.013, p value = 0.034) remained significant to predict the complete retina resolution. For visual acuity, integrated ellipsoid zone (EZ) band (OR = 0.239, 95% CI = 0.073, 0.783, p value = 0.018) might be a significant predictive factor. Subgroup analysis further indicated that in eyes with an intact EZ band, a poorer baseline BCVA was associated with an increase in postoperative BCVA (p=0.015). Conversely, in those with disrupted EZ band, all included factors showed no significant difference. Conclusion: The study observed trends in the recovery pattern of the retina following surgery and suggested potential factors that may be associated with improvements in both visual acuity and retinal reattachment. The findings may offer some guidance to ophthalmic surgeons in considering the timing of surgery, although further research is needed to confirm these trends as definitive predictors.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响玻璃体切割内限制膜剥离治疗近视中央凹裂疗效的因素。
目的:探讨睫状体部玻璃体切除术(PPV)联合内限制膜剥离术(ILM)对近视中央凹裂(MF)患者的视力和黄斑形态的短期和长期影响,并探讨影响预后的潜在因素。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月至2022年12月北京友谊医院同一名资深眼底外科医生对MF患者行PPV合并ILM剥离的临床资料。剥落以黄斑中央凹为中心,延伸至颞上和颞下血管拱廊。通过单因素分析和多因素logistic回归分析筛选影响预后的因素。结果:共分析36例患者36只眼。最佳矫正视力(BCVA)由1.10±0.61 logMAR显著提高至0.78±0.58 logMAR (p=0.031)。23眼(63.89%)术后BCVA改善≥2条Snellen线。平均中央凹厚度(CFT)由427.14±255.91 μm降至155.85±67.33 μm (p < 0.001)。18眼和16眼分别实现部分和完全视网膜再植,如下所示。术后12个月是影响MF分辨率的阈值,但不影响视力。多元logistic回归显示CFT (OR = 1.007, 95% CI = 1.001, 1.013, p值= 0.034)对预测视网膜完全分辨率仍有显著性意义。对于视力,综合椭球带(EZ)波段(OR = 0.239, 95% CI = 0.073, 0.783, p值= 0.018)可能是显著的预测因子。亚组分析进一步表明,在EZ带完整的眼睛中,较差的基线BCVA与术后BCVA增加相关(p=0.015)。相反,在EZ带断裂的患者中,所有因素均无显著差异。结论:本研究观察了手术后视网膜恢复模式的趋势,并提出了可能与视力和视网膜再附着改善相关的潜在因素。尽管需要进一步的研究来证实这些趋势作为明确的预测因素,但研究结果可能为眼科医生考虑手术时机提供一些指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ophthalmology
Journal of Ophthalmology MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-OPHTHALMOLOGY
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the anatomy, physiology and diseases of the eye. Submissions should focus on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, as well as clinical trials and research findings.
期刊最新文献
Long-Term Graft Survival and Visual Outcomes in Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK): A Narrative Review. Reducing the Carbon Footprint of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Therapy: Environmental Impact of Transitioning to Aflibercept 8 mg. Relationship Between COVID-19 and Retinal Artery Occlusions. Artificial Intelligence Applications in Sickle Cell Retinopathy Imaging: Current Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions. Association Between Dietary Patterns and Myopia Among Children and Adolescents: A School-Based Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1