Low apolipoprotein A-II levels causally contribute to increased mortality in septic shock.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Intensive Care Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1186/s40560-025-00782-2
Nozomi Takahashi, Kyle R Campbell, Tadanaga Shimada, Taka-Aki Nakada, James A Russell, Keith R Walley
{"title":"Low apolipoprotein A-II levels causally contribute to increased mortality in septic shock.","authors":"Nozomi Takahashi, Kyle R Campbell, Tadanaga Shimada, Taka-Aki Nakada, James A Russell, Keith R Walley","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00782-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lipoproteins and their component apolipoproteins play an important role in sepsis. However, little is known with regard to the association and causal contribution of these proteins to mortality in patients of different ancestries following septic shock. The objective of this study was to determine whether lipoprotein and apolipoprotein levels, and related genetic variants, are associated with clinical outcomes in septic shock.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated the association between lipoprotein and apolipoprotein levels at the point of admission to the intensive care unit and in-hospital mortality in 687 Japan patients diagnosed with septic shock. For each clinically significant candidate protein, we extracted haplotype tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the corresponding gene and examined the association of the candidate gene variants with 28-day mortality and organ dysfunction. We tested for replication in a Caucasian septic shock cohort (Vasopressin and Septic Shock Trial, VASST, n = 474). To determine whether the candidate lipoprotein causally contributed to septic shock outcome, we used a Mendelian randomization analysis based on polygenic scores generated from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in the Japan cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the Japan cohort, low apolipoprotein A-II levels were associated with increased septic shock mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.05; 95%CI, 1.02-1.09; P < 0.001). For a haplotype tag SNP of the corresponding ApoA2 gene, rs6413453 GG carriers had significantly higher 28-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-3.04; P = 0.029) and significantly fewer days free of cardiovascular, respiratory, renal and neurologic dysfunction than AG/AA carriers. This result was replicated in the Caucasian septic shock cohort (28-day mortality: aHR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.02-2.68; P = 0.041). Mendelian randomization using 9 SNPs from an apolipoprotein A-II GWAS suggested that genetically decreased levels of apolipoprotein A-II were a causal factor for increased mortality in septic shock (odds ratio for mortality due to a 1 mg/dL decrease in apolipoprotein A-II is 1.05 [95% CI; 1.01-1.03, P = 0.0022]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In septic shock, apolipoprotein A-II levels and ApoA2 genetic variations are important factors associated with outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11841007/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-025-00782-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lipoproteins and their component apolipoproteins play an important role in sepsis. However, little is known with regard to the association and causal contribution of these proteins to mortality in patients of different ancestries following septic shock. The objective of this study was to determine whether lipoprotein and apolipoprotein levels, and related genetic variants, are associated with clinical outcomes in septic shock.

Methods: We investigated the association between lipoprotein and apolipoprotein levels at the point of admission to the intensive care unit and in-hospital mortality in 687 Japan patients diagnosed with septic shock. For each clinically significant candidate protein, we extracted haplotype tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the corresponding gene and examined the association of the candidate gene variants with 28-day mortality and organ dysfunction. We tested for replication in a Caucasian septic shock cohort (Vasopressin and Septic Shock Trial, VASST, n = 474). To determine whether the candidate lipoprotein causally contributed to septic shock outcome, we used a Mendelian randomization analysis based on polygenic scores generated from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in the Japan cohort.

Results: In the Japan cohort, low apolipoprotein A-II levels were associated with increased septic shock mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.05; 95%CI, 1.02-1.09; P < 0.001). For a haplotype tag SNP of the corresponding ApoA2 gene, rs6413453 GG carriers had significantly higher 28-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-3.04; P = 0.029) and significantly fewer days free of cardiovascular, respiratory, renal and neurologic dysfunction than AG/AA carriers. This result was replicated in the Caucasian septic shock cohort (28-day mortality: aHR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.02-2.68; P = 0.041). Mendelian randomization using 9 SNPs from an apolipoprotein A-II GWAS suggested that genetically decreased levels of apolipoprotein A-II were a causal factor for increased mortality in septic shock (odds ratio for mortality due to a 1 mg/dL decrease in apolipoprotein A-II is 1.05 [95% CI; 1.01-1.03, P = 0.0022]).

Conclusions: In septic shock, apolipoprotein A-II levels and ApoA2 genetic variations are important factors associated with outcome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Intensive Care" is an open access journal dedicated to the comprehensive coverage of intensive care medicine, providing a platform for the latest research and clinical insights in this critical field. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including intensive and critical care, trauma and surgical intensive care, pediatric intensive care, acute and emergency medicine, perioperative medicine, resuscitation, infection control, and organ dysfunction. Recognizing the importance of cultural diversity in healthcare practices, "Journal of Intensive Care" also encourages submissions that explore and discuss the cultural aspects of intensive care, aiming to promote a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to patient care. By fostering a global exchange of knowledge and expertise, the journal contributes to the continuous improvement of intensive care practices worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Low apolipoprotein A-II levels causally contribute to increased mortality in septic shock. Epidemiological trends of mechanically ventilated acute respiratory distress syndrome in the twenty-first century: a nationwide, population-based retrospective study. External validation and comparative performance of the SLANT score for neuroprognostication in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors undergoing targeted temperature management: insights from an Asian cohort. Two-year trajectory of functional recovery and quality of life in post-intensive care syndrome: a multicenter prospective observational study on mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease-19. Association between the triglyceride-glucose index and the risk of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1