Endometriosis Clinical and Surgical Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparison of Virtual-Only Care to Virtual and In-Person Care Combined.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of minimally invasive gynecology Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2025.02.009
Emma Goodwin, Hannah Rojas, Heather Noga, Caroline E Lee, Mohamed A Bedaiwy, Christina Williams, Catherine Allaire, Paul J Yong
{"title":"Endometriosis Clinical and Surgical Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparison of Virtual-Only Care to Virtual and In-Person Care Combined.","authors":"Emma Goodwin, Hannah Rojas, Heather Noga, Caroline E Lee, Mohamed A Bedaiwy, Christina Williams, Catherine Allaire, Paul J Yong","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Endometriosis is a chronic and inflammatory condition that affects approximately 10% of the reproductive-age population. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a shift towards virtual care for endometriosis. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic and treatment outcomes of virtual-only care, compared to those who had both virtual and in-person visits.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective descriptive analysis of registry data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study was conducted in British Columbia, Canada, at a tertiary referral center for endometriosis and pelvic pain.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>In this cohort (n=389), we examined patients who received an initial virtual assessment followed by virtual care alone (Virtual Only group, n=203) and those who had an initial virtual assessment followed by an in-person physical exam (Physical Exam group, n=186).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Virtual care at the center during the Covid-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Physical Exam group was more likely to have surgery compared to the Virtual Only group (45.7% vs. 16%, p<.001). At the time of surgery, the groups did not differ based on type of surgery (e.g. excision of endometriosis and/or hysterectomy), endometriosis anatomic findings (e.g. stage and anatomic subtype), surgical complexity or surgical complications. At baseline, the two groups did not differ in their pain, mental health or quality of life scores. At one-year follow-up, the two groups did not differ in these outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a lower rate of surgery, but no differences in surgical findings or complications, nor in one-year outcomes, after virtual only care for endometriosis compared to patients that had a virtual visit and then underwent a physical exam. These results support a hybrid model, where a virtual visit is the first contact and serves as a triage tool to determine whether a patient is appropriate for virtual only care or would benefit from a physical exam. Future research could incorporate population-based administrative data or qualitative approaches to understanding patient experiences and physician perspectives on virtual care for the treatment of endometriosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.02.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Endometriosis is a chronic and inflammatory condition that affects approximately 10% of the reproductive-age population. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a shift towards virtual care for endometriosis. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic and treatment outcomes of virtual-only care, compared to those who had both virtual and in-person visits.

Design: Retrospective descriptive analysis of registry data.

Setting: This study was conducted in British Columbia, Canada, at a tertiary referral center for endometriosis and pelvic pain.

Participants: In this cohort (n=389), we examined patients who received an initial virtual assessment followed by virtual care alone (Virtual Only group, n=203) and those who had an initial virtual assessment followed by an in-person physical exam (Physical Exam group, n=186).

Interventions: Virtual care at the center during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Results: The Physical Exam group was more likely to have surgery compared to the Virtual Only group (45.7% vs. 16%, p<.001). At the time of surgery, the groups did not differ based on type of surgery (e.g. excision of endometriosis and/or hysterectomy), endometriosis anatomic findings (e.g. stage and anatomic subtype), surgical complexity or surgical complications. At baseline, the two groups did not differ in their pain, mental health or quality of life scores. At one-year follow-up, the two groups did not differ in these outcome measures.

Conclusion: There was a lower rate of surgery, but no differences in surgical findings or complications, nor in one-year outcomes, after virtual only care for endometriosis compared to patients that had a virtual visit and then underwent a physical exam. These results support a hybrid model, where a virtual visit is the first contact and serves as a triage tool to determine whether a patient is appropriate for virtual only care or would benefit from a physical exam. Future research could incorporate population-based administrative data or qualitative approaches to understanding patient experiences and physician perspectives on virtual care for the treatment of endometriosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
期刊最新文献
"Amputation of a type 0 submucous myoma between diagnostic and operative myomectomy." High-Level Arterial Occlusion with Bulldog Clamps for Laparoscopic Myomectomy. Laparoendoscopic Single Site Surgery for Adnexal Torsion in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy. Endometriosis Clinical and Surgical Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparison of Virtual-Only Care to Virtual and In-Person Care Combined. DIAGNOSIS AND LAPAROSCOPIC MANAGEMENT OF INTRAHEPATIC ENDOMETRIOMA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1