Pre-operative High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Mechanical Ventilation Decrease Survival following Superior Cavopulmonary Connection.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pediatric Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1007/s00246-025-03800-0
Sydney Elizer, Deepti P Bhat, Daniel A Velez, Arash Sabati
{"title":"Pre-operative High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Mechanical Ventilation Decrease Survival following Superior Cavopulmonary Connection.","authors":"Sydney Elizer, Deepti P Bhat, Daniel A Velez, Arash Sabati","doi":"10.1007/s00246-025-03800-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To determine if pre-operative high-flow nasal cannula (flow > 2 L per minute) or mechanical ventilation impact post-operative outcomes after the superior cavopulmonary connection. A single-center retrospective review of single-ventricle patients who underwent the superior cavopulmonary connection procedure at a tertiary care center over a 10-year period. Patients who underwent the procedure at greater than 2 years of age were excluded. The groups of interest were those who were on mechanical ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula. Patients in room air or on nasal cannula oxygen served as the control group. A total of 269 consecutive patients were included, of which 44 required high-flow nasal cannula and 17 required mechanical ventilation prior to the superior cavopulmonary connection procedure. Thirty-day post-operative survival was high, with 1 death in both the high-flow nasal cannula and the mechanical ventilation groups. At 1-year post-procedure, the transplant-free survival was lower in the mechanically ventilated group when compared to the high-flow nasal cannula and room air groups (46% vs. 84% vs. 95%, p value < 0.01). The same trend was seen at 5 years (20% vs 78% vs 90%, p value < 0.01). These groups also had worse overall survival, longer post-operative lengths of stay, and longer post-operative intubation durations. Pre-operative respiratory support with high-flow nasal cannula or mechanical ventilation is associated with decreased overall survival and reduced transplant-free survival at 1- and 5-year post-superior cavopulmonary connection.</p>","PeriodicalId":19814,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-025-03800-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To determine if pre-operative high-flow nasal cannula (flow > 2 L per minute) or mechanical ventilation impact post-operative outcomes after the superior cavopulmonary connection. A single-center retrospective review of single-ventricle patients who underwent the superior cavopulmonary connection procedure at a tertiary care center over a 10-year period. Patients who underwent the procedure at greater than 2 years of age were excluded. The groups of interest were those who were on mechanical ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula. Patients in room air or on nasal cannula oxygen served as the control group. A total of 269 consecutive patients were included, of which 44 required high-flow nasal cannula and 17 required mechanical ventilation prior to the superior cavopulmonary connection procedure. Thirty-day post-operative survival was high, with 1 death in both the high-flow nasal cannula and the mechanical ventilation groups. At 1-year post-procedure, the transplant-free survival was lower in the mechanically ventilated group when compared to the high-flow nasal cannula and room air groups (46% vs. 84% vs. 95%, p value < 0.01). The same trend was seen at 5 years (20% vs 78% vs 90%, p value < 0.01). These groups also had worse overall survival, longer post-operative lengths of stay, and longer post-operative intubation durations. Pre-operative respiratory support with high-flow nasal cannula or mechanical ventilation is associated with decreased overall survival and reduced transplant-free survival at 1- and 5-year post-superior cavopulmonary connection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的:确定术前高流量鼻插管(流量大于每分钟 2 升)或机械通气是否会影响上腔肺连接术后的预后。对一家三级医疗中心 10 年间接受腔肺上腔连接手术的单心室患者进行单中心回顾性研究。年龄超过两岁接受手术的患者被排除在外。研究对象为使用机械通气或高流量鼻插管的患者。使用室内空气或鼻插管吸氧的患者为对照组。共纳入了 269 名连续患者,其中 44 人在上腔肺连接手术前需要高流量鼻插管,17 人需要机械通气。术后 30 天存活率很高,高流量鼻插管组和机械通气组均有 1 例死亡。术后 1 年,机械通气组的无移植存活率低于高流量鼻插管组和室内空气组(46% vs. 84% vs. 95%,P 值为 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Cardiology
Pediatric Cardiology 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
258
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The editor of Pediatric Cardiology welcomes original manuscripts concerning all aspects of heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents, including embryology and anatomy, physiology and pharmacology, biochemistry, pathology, genetics, radiology, clinical aspects, investigative cardiology, electrophysiology and echocardiography, and cardiac surgery. Articles which may include original articles, review articles, letters to the editor etc., must be written in English and must be submitted solely to Pediatric Cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Correction: The Relationship Between Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Atherogenic Index with LV Geometry Pattern in Obese Children: Results from a Cross-Sectional Study in Serbia. Correction: Response to the Letter Titled "Same Entity, Different Hemodynamics: Residual VSD After TOF Repair and Isolated VSD Closure" From Dr. Safak ALPAT. Analysis of Cytokine Profiles in Pediatric Myocarditis Multicenter Study. Cognitive Biases in High-Stakes Decision-Making: Implications for Joint Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery Conference. School Readiness in Preschool-Age Children with Critical Congenital Heart Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1