A systematic literature review of machine learning techniques for the detection of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder using MRI and/or EEG data

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.02.019
Dhruv Chandra Lohani, Vaishali Chawla, Bharti Rana
{"title":"A systematic literature review of machine learning techniques for the detection of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder using MRI and/or EEG data","authors":"Dhruv Chandra Lohani,&nbsp;Vaishali Chawla,&nbsp;Bharti Rana","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.02.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental condition common in teenagers across the globe. Neuroimaging and Machine Learning (ML) advancements have revolutionized its diagnosis and treatment approaches. Although, the researchers are continuously developing automated ADHD diagnostic tools, there is no reliable ML-based diagnostic system for clinicians. Thus, the study aims to systematically review ML and DL-based approaches for ADHD diagnosis, leveraging brain data from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalogram (EEG) data. A methodical review for the period 2016 to 2022 is conducted by following the PRISMA guidelines. Four reputable repositories, namely PubMed, IEEE, ScienceDirect, and Springer are searched for the related literature on ADHD diagnosis using MRI/EEG data. 87 studies are selected after screening abstracts of the papers. We critically conducted an analysis of these studies by examining various aspects related to training ML/DL-models, including diverse datasets, hyperparameter tuning, overfitting, and interpretability. The quality and risk assessment is conducted using the QUADAS2 tool to determine the bias due to patient selection, index test, reference standard, and flow and timing. Our rigours analysis observed significant diversity in dataset acquisition and its size, feature extraction and selection techniques, validation strategies and classifier choices. Our findings emphasize the need for generalizability, transparency, interpretability, and reproducibility in future research. The challenges and potential solutions associated with integrating diagnostic models into clinical settings are also discussed. The identified research gaps will guide researchers in developing a reliable ADHD diagnostic system that addresses the associated challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19142,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience","volume":"570 ","pages":"Pages 110-131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306452225001277","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental condition common in teenagers across the globe. Neuroimaging and Machine Learning (ML) advancements have revolutionized its diagnosis and treatment approaches. Although, the researchers are continuously developing automated ADHD diagnostic tools, there is no reliable ML-based diagnostic system for clinicians. Thus, the study aims to systematically review ML and DL-based approaches for ADHD diagnosis, leveraging brain data from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalogram (EEG) data. A methodical review for the period 2016 to 2022 is conducted by following the PRISMA guidelines. Four reputable repositories, namely PubMed, IEEE, ScienceDirect, and Springer are searched for the related literature on ADHD diagnosis using MRI/EEG data. 87 studies are selected after screening abstracts of the papers. We critically conducted an analysis of these studies by examining various aspects related to training ML/DL-models, including diverse datasets, hyperparameter tuning, overfitting, and interpretability. The quality and risk assessment is conducted using the QUADAS2 tool to determine the bias due to patient selection, index test, reference standard, and flow and timing. Our rigours analysis observed significant diversity in dataset acquisition and its size, feature extraction and selection techniques, validation strategies and classifier choices. Our findings emphasize the need for generalizability, transparency, interpretability, and reproducibility in future research. The challenges and potential solutions associated with integrating diagnostic models into clinical settings are also discussed. The identified research gaps will guide researchers in developing a reliable ADHD diagnostic system that addresses the associated challenges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用磁共振成像和/或脑电图数据检测注意力缺陷/多动症的机器学习技术的系统性文献综述。
注意力缺陷/多动症(ADHD)是全球青少年常见的一种神经发育疾病。神经影像学和机器学习(ML)的进步彻底改变了其诊断和治疗方法。尽管研究人员正在不断开发 ADHD 自动诊断工具,但目前还没有可靠的基于 ML 的诊断系统供临床医生使用。因此,本研究旨在利用磁共振成像(MRI)和脑电图(EEG)数据中的大脑数据,系统回顾基于 ML 和 DL 的多动症诊断方法。我们遵循 PRISMA 指南,对 2016 年至 2022 年期间的研究进行了系统回顾。我们在 PubMed、IEEE、ScienceDirect 和 Springer 等四个知名文献库中搜索了使用 MRI/EEG 数据诊断多动症的相关文献。在对论文摘要进行筛选后,选出了 87 项研究。我们对这些研究进行了批判性分析,检查了与训练 ML/DL 模型相关的各个方面,包括不同的数据集、超参数调整、过拟合和可解释性。我们使用 QUADAS2 工具进行了质量和风险评估,以确定由于患者选择、指标测试、参考标准以及流程和时间造成的偏差。通过严格的分析,我们发现数据集的获取及其规模、特征提取和选择技术、验证策略和分类器的选择都存在很大差异。我们的研究结果强调了在未来研究中对通用性、透明度、可解释性和可重复性的需求。我们还讨论了与将诊断模型整合到临床环境中相关的挑战和潜在解决方案。发现的研究空白将指导研究人员开发可靠的多动症诊断系统,以应对相关挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience
Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
394
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Neuroscience publishes papers describing the results of original research on any aspect of the scientific study of the nervous system. Any paper, however short, will be considered for publication provided that it reports significant, new and carefully confirmed findings with full experimental details.
期刊最新文献
Effects of personalized vs. non-personalized neurostimulation protocols in improving speech and limb reaction times. Neurobiological and psychosocial mechanisms linking early life stress to the pathogenesis of eating disorders. Zebrafish neural regeneration: mechanistic insights into human nervous system repair Modulatory effects of genetic vs. pharmacological HCN4 channel inhibition on stimuli transmission during acute pain. A multi-target therapeutic framework for Alzheimer's disease: an integrative mechanistic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1