Investigating the effects of focused attention (mantra) meditation on mismatch negativity: Insights into sensory and cognitive processing using an intensity oddball paradigm.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.02.017
Chandan Srivastava, Jamie A O'Reilly, Rashmi Gupta
{"title":"Investigating the effects of focused attention (mantra) meditation on mismatch negativity: Insights into sensory and cognitive processing using an intensity oddball paradigm.","authors":"Chandan Srivastava, Jamie A O'Reilly, Rashmi Gupta","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.02.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past fifty years, research has enhanced our understanding of meditation and its effects on cognition. Meditation is particularly promising due to its long-term (trait) effects, which persist outside meditation sessions. Advances in neuroimaging have enabled the study of these effects using neural markers such as mismatch negativity (MMN), which reflects the involuntary shift of attention to unexpected acoustic changes. This shift is modulated by attentional control, a key area where focused attention (FA) meditation training offers improvements. However, studies investigating the trait effects of FA meditation on MMN have produced mixed results, with previous research introducing confounds from short-term (state) effects that may influence trait-specific assessments. Furthermore, most research has focused on breath-based FA meditation, overlooking other prominent forms of FA meditation that might differentially modulate MMN, as per recent studies. The current study, therefore, examines mantra meditation, a widely practiced form of FA meditation, with an adequately powered sample to address the mixed findings in the literature. The study employs an intensity oddball paradigm instead of commonly used frequency oddball paradigms to assess whether MMN arises from higher-order cognitive processes or sensory adaptation. The findings reveal similar MMN amplitude in experts and novices, suggesting that MMN may be insensitive to meditation expertise or influenced by the enhanced attentional skills of novices. Additionally, a unidirectional polarity shift in event-related potential to deviant stimuli suggests that meditation effects on MMN should be interpreted in the context of higher-order deviance detection mechanism.</p>","PeriodicalId":19142,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.02.017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past fifty years, research has enhanced our understanding of meditation and its effects on cognition. Meditation is particularly promising due to its long-term (trait) effects, which persist outside meditation sessions. Advances in neuroimaging have enabled the study of these effects using neural markers such as mismatch negativity (MMN), which reflects the involuntary shift of attention to unexpected acoustic changes. This shift is modulated by attentional control, a key area where focused attention (FA) meditation training offers improvements. However, studies investigating the trait effects of FA meditation on MMN have produced mixed results, with previous research introducing confounds from short-term (state) effects that may influence trait-specific assessments. Furthermore, most research has focused on breath-based FA meditation, overlooking other prominent forms of FA meditation that might differentially modulate MMN, as per recent studies. The current study, therefore, examines mantra meditation, a widely practiced form of FA meditation, with an adequately powered sample to address the mixed findings in the literature. The study employs an intensity oddball paradigm instead of commonly used frequency oddball paradigms to assess whether MMN arises from higher-order cognitive processes or sensory adaptation. The findings reveal similar MMN amplitude in experts and novices, suggesting that MMN may be insensitive to meditation expertise or influenced by the enhanced attentional skills of novices. Additionally, a unidirectional polarity shift in event-related potential to deviant stimuli suggests that meditation effects on MMN should be interpreted in the context of higher-order deviance detection mechanism.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience
Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
394
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Neuroscience publishes papers describing the results of original research on any aspect of the scientific study of the nervous system. Any paper, however short, will be considered for publication provided that it reports significant, new and carefully confirmed findings with full experimental details.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Neurobiological mechanisms underlying coordinated actions in joint action. Discovering genetically-supported drug targets for multisite chronic pain through multi-omics Mendelian randomization and single-cell RNA-sequencing. Electroacupuncture restores maternal separation-induced glutamatergic presynaptic deficits of the medial prefrontal cortex in adulthood Event-Related Spectral Perturbations differences analyzed in standard-deviant tone sequences presented in a passive and active conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1