Beyond the Surface: Assessing GPT-4's Accuracy in Detecting Melanoma and Suspicious Skin Lesions From Dermoscopic Images.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Plastic surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1177/22925503251315489
Jonah W Perlmutter, John Milkovich, Sierra Fremont, Shaishav Datta, Adam Mosa
{"title":"Beyond the Surface: Assessing GPT-4's Accuracy in Detecting Melanoma and Suspicious Skin Lesions From Dermoscopic Images.","authors":"Jonah W Perlmutter, John Milkovich, Sierra Fremont, Shaishav Datta, Adam Mosa","doi":"10.1177/22925503251315489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Self-examinations for skin cancer detection are limited by sensitivity. ChatGPT-4 has image recognition capabilities that can be a useful adjunct for screening cancers and tele-health applications. This study investigated the efficacy of ChatGPT-4 in identifying skin lesions. <b>Methods:</b> Dermoscopic images were retrospectively selected from the PH<sup>2</sup> dataset, categorized by clinical diagnosis, and uploaded to ChatGPT-4 with a predesigned prompt. Responses were compared against clinical diagnoses. Confidence intervals were calculated using the bootstrap method assessing precision and significance was calculated using McNemar's test. Analyses were performed using Jupyter Notebook and Python. <b>Results:</b> The GPT-4 model showed moderate performance in melanoma detection with 68.5% accuracy, 52.5% sensitivity, and 72.5% specificity, significantly differing from the clinical standard (<i>P</i> = .002). For suspicious lesion detection, it performed better with 68.0% accuracy, 78.0% precision, and 70.0% F-measure, still not closely matching clinical diagnosis for atypical nevi and melanoma (<i>P</i> = .0169). <b>Conclusion:</b> The statistical difference between ChatGPT-4 diagnosis of melanoma and suspicious lesions compared with clinical diagnoses and other AI models suggests the need for improvement in ChatGPT-4 algorithms. This study's limitations included the use of a secondary care database with a higher melanoma incidence, high-quality dermoscopic images that limit generalizability, a small sample size lacking diversity, and the need for larger datasets to validate findings in broader contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251315489"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503251315489","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Self-examinations for skin cancer detection are limited by sensitivity. ChatGPT-4 has image recognition capabilities that can be a useful adjunct for screening cancers and tele-health applications. This study investigated the efficacy of ChatGPT-4 in identifying skin lesions. Methods: Dermoscopic images were retrospectively selected from the PH2 dataset, categorized by clinical diagnosis, and uploaded to ChatGPT-4 with a predesigned prompt. Responses were compared against clinical diagnoses. Confidence intervals were calculated using the bootstrap method assessing precision and significance was calculated using McNemar's test. Analyses were performed using Jupyter Notebook and Python. Results: The GPT-4 model showed moderate performance in melanoma detection with 68.5% accuracy, 52.5% sensitivity, and 72.5% specificity, significantly differing from the clinical standard (P = .002). For suspicious lesion detection, it performed better with 68.0% accuracy, 78.0% precision, and 70.0% F-measure, still not closely matching clinical diagnosis for atypical nevi and melanoma (P = .0169). Conclusion: The statistical difference between ChatGPT-4 diagnosis of melanoma and suspicious lesions compared with clinical diagnoses and other AI models suggests the need for improvement in ChatGPT-4 algorithms. This study's limitations included the use of a secondary care database with a higher melanoma incidence, high-quality dermoscopic images that limit generalizability, a small sample size lacking diversity, and the need for larger datasets to validate findings in broader contexts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越表面:评估GPT-4在皮肤镜图像中检测黑色素瘤和可疑皮肤病变的准确性。
导读:自检检测皮肤癌受到敏感性的限制。ChatGPT-4具有图像识别功能,可作为筛查癌症和远程保健应用程序的有用辅助。本研究探讨了ChatGPT-4在识别皮肤病变中的作用。方法:回顾性地从PH2数据集中选择皮肤镜图像,根据临床诊断进行分类,并以预先设计的提示上传至ChatGPT-4。将反应与临床诊断进行比较。采用自举法计算置信区间,采用McNemar检验计算显著性。使用Jupyter Notebook和Python进行分析。结果:GPT-4模型在黑色素瘤检测中表现中等,准确率为68.5%,灵敏度为52.5%,特异性为72.5%,与临床标准差异显著(P = 0.002)。对于可疑病变的检测,准确率为68.0%,精密度为78.0%,F-measure值为70.0%,但与非典型痣和黑色素瘤的临床诊断仍不吻合(P = 0.0169)。结论:ChatGPT-4对黑色素瘤及可疑病变的诊断与临床诊断及其他AI模型相比存在统计学差异,提示ChatGPT-4算法有待改进。本研究的局限性包括:使用的是黑色素瘤发病率较高的二级护理数据库,高质量的皮肤镜图像限制了通用性,样本量小,缺乏多样性,需要更大的数据集来验证更广泛背景下的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plastic surgery
Plastic surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Plastic Surgery (Chirurgie Plastique) is the official journal of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Group for the Advancement of Microsurgery, and the Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand. It serves as a major venue for Canadian research, society guidelines, and continuing medical education.
期刊最新文献
Anatomical Landmarks of Umbilical Aesthetics. WALANT Thumb CMC Joint Denervation Under Field Sterility: A Case Report and Description of Technique. Intraoperative Hypothermia in Plastic Surgery: Procedure-Specific Patterns and the Call for Preventive Strategies. Postoperative Bladder Distension Leading to Compromised VRAM Flap Perfusion Following Abdominoperineal Reconstruction: A Two-Case Series. Desire for and Successful Access to Feminizing and Masculinizing Gender-Affirming Surgeries: A Cross-Sectional Canada Wide Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1