Opportunities and challenges to delivering a trial for depressive symptoms in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from the Alpha-Stim-D randomised controlled trial.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Trials Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-08772-3
Shireen Patel, Priya Patel, Clement Boutry, Boliang Guo, Deborah Butler, Fred Higton, Rebecca McNaughton, Paul M Briley, Christopher Griffiths, Neil Nixon, Vibhore Prasad, Kapil Sayal, David Smart, Azhar Zafar, Joe Kai, Richard Morriss
{"title":"Opportunities and challenges to delivering a trial for depressive symptoms in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from the Alpha-Stim-D randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Shireen Patel, Priya Patel, Clement Boutry, Boliang Guo, Deborah Butler, Fred Higton, Rebecca McNaughton, Paul M Briley, Christopher Griffiths, Neil Nixon, Vibhore Prasad, Kapil Sayal, David Smart, Azhar Zafar, Joe Kai, Richard Morriss","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-08772-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are widely regarded as the most powerful research design for evidence-based practice. However, recruiting to RCTs can be challenging resulting in heightened costs and delays in research completion and implementation. Enabling successful recruitment is crucial in mental health research. Despite the increase in the use of remote recruitment strategies and digital health interventions, there is limited evidence on methods to improve recruitment to remotely delivered mental health trials. The paper outlines practical examples and recommendations on how to successfully recruit participants to remotely delivered mental health trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Alpha Stim-D Trial was a multi-centre double-blind randomised controlled trial, for people aged 16 years upwards, addressing depressive symptoms in primary care. Despite a 6-month delay in beginning recruitment due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the trial met the recruitment target within the timeframe and achieved high retention rates. Several strategies were implemented to improve recruitment; some of these were adapted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This included adapting the original in-person recruitment strategies. Subsequently, systematic recruitment using postal invitations from criteria-specific search of the sites' electronic health records was added to opportunistic recruitment to increase referrals in response to sub-target recruitment whilst also reducing the burden on referring sites. Throughout the recruitment process, the research team collaborated with key stakeholders, such as primary care clinicians and the project's Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPI/E) representatives, who gave advice on recruitment strategies. Furthermore, the study researchers played a key role in communicating with participants and building rapport from study introduction to data collection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that trial processes can influence recruitment; therefore, consideration and a regular review of the recruitment figures and strategies is important. Recruitment of participants can be maximised by utilising remote approaches, which reduce the burden and amount of time required by referring sites and allow the research team to reach more participants whilst providing participants and researchers with more flexibility. Effectively communicating and working collaboratively with key stakeholders throughout the trial process, as well as building rapport with participants, may also improve recruitment rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"62"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843808/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08772-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are widely regarded as the most powerful research design for evidence-based practice. However, recruiting to RCTs can be challenging resulting in heightened costs and delays in research completion and implementation. Enabling successful recruitment is crucial in mental health research. Despite the increase in the use of remote recruitment strategies and digital health interventions, there is limited evidence on methods to improve recruitment to remotely delivered mental health trials. The paper outlines practical examples and recommendations on how to successfully recruit participants to remotely delivered mental health trials.

Methods: The Alpha Stim-D Trial was a multi-centre double-blind randomised controlled trial, for people aged 16 years upwards, addressing depressive symptoms in primary care. Despite a 6-month delay in beginning recruitment due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the trial met the recruitment target within the timeframe and achieved high retention rates. Several strategies were implemented to improve recruitment; some of these were adapted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This included adapting the original in-person recruitment strategies. Subsequently, systematic recruitment using postal invitations from criteria-specific search of the sites' electronic health records was added to opportunistic recruitment to increase referrals in response to sub-target recruitment whilst also reducing the burden on referring sites. Throughout the recruitment process, the research team collaborated with key stakeholders, such as primary care clinicians and the project's Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPI/E) representatives, who gave advice on recruitment strategies. Furthermore, the study researchers played a key role in communicating with participants and building rapport from study introduction to data collection.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that trial processes can influence recruitment; therefore, consideration and a regular review of the recruitment figures and strategies is important. Recruitment of participants can be maximised by utilising remote approaches, which reduce the burden and amount of time required by referring sites and allow the research team to reach more participants whilst providing participants and researchers with more flexibility. Effectively communicating and working collaboratively with key stakeholders throughout the trial process, as well as building rapport with participants, may also improve recruitment rates.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在COVID-19大流行期间开展初级保健抑郁症状试验的机遇和挑战:来自Alpha-Stim-D随机对照试验的见解
背景:随机对照试验(RCTs)被广泛认为是循证实践中最有力的研究设计。然而,招募随机对照试验可能具有挑战性,导致成本增加和研究完成和实施的延迟。成功招募人员对心理健康研究至关重要。尽管远程招聘策略和数字卫生干预措施的使用有所增加,但关于改进远程提供精神卫生试验招聘的方法的证据有限。这篇论文概述了如何成功招募参与者进行远程心理健康试验的实际例子和建议。方法:Alpha Stim-D试验是一项多中心双盲随机对照试验,针对16岁以上的人群,在初级保健中解决抑郁症状。尽管受新冠肺炎大流行影响,招募工作推迟了6个月,但该试验在规定时间内完成了招募目标,并取得了较高的留用率。实施了若干改进征聘的战略;其中一些是为应对COVID-19大流行而调整的。这包括调整原来的面对面招聘策略。随后,在机会性招聘中加入了通过特定标准搜索网站电子健康记录的邮件邀请进行系统招聘,以增加针对次目标招聘的转诊,同时也减轻了转诊网站的负担。在整个招聘过程中,研究团队与主要利益相关者合作,如初级保健临床医生和项目的患者和公众参与和参与(PPI/E)代表,他们就招聘策略提出建议。此外,从研究介绍到数据收集,研究人员在与参与者沟通和建立融洽关系方面发挥了关键作用。结论:我们的研究结果表明,审判过程可以影响招聘;因此,审议和定期审查征聘数字和战略是很重要的。通过使用远程方法可以最大限度地招募参与者,这减少了参考站点所需的负担和时间,并使研究团队能够接触到更多的参与者,同时为参与者和研究人员提供更大的灵活性。在整个试验过程中,与主要利益相关者进行有效的沟通和协作,以及与参与者建立融洽的关系,也可能提高招聘率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
期刊最新文献
Calcium supplementation for prevention of pre-eclampsia in high-risk women: study protocol for a randomised triple-blind placebo-controlled trial (CaPE). Agreement and utility between registry and trial mortality data - a data utility comparison in the BOSS trial. Treatment guided by cerebral oximetry in newborns receiving invasive mechanical ventilation: study protocol for step one of the SafeBoosC-IIIv randomised clinical trial. Optimizing expectations in an internet- and mobile-based intervention for depression: study protocol for a randomized factorial trial. Neuroendoscopy-assisted drainage versus burr hole drainage for chronic subdural hematoma (URANUS): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1