Single-Institution Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Cost Analysis of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion in Geriatric Patients with Cervical Disc Herniation

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY World neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123798
Bahie Ezzat , Yehia Elkersh , Roshini Kalagara , Priya Bhanot , Juhana Habib , Matthew T. Carr , Alexander J. Schüpper , Hanya M. Qureshi , Eugene Hrabarchuk , Addison Quinones , Tanvir F. Choudhri
{"title":"Single-Institution Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Cost Analysis of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion in Geriatric Patients with Cervical Disc Herniation","authors":"Bahie Ezzat ,&nbsp;Yehia Elkersh ,&nbsp;Roshini Kalagara ,&nbsp;Priya Bhanot ,&nbsp;Juhana Habib ,&nbsp;Matthew T. Carr ,&nbsp;Alexander J. Schüpper ,&nbsp;Hanya M. Qureshi ,&nbsp;Eugene Hrabarchuk ,&nbsp;Addison Quinones ,&nbsp;Tanvir F. Choudhri","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite the surge in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) procedures over the past 2 decades, there remains a paucity of data on their comparative costs in geriatric patients with cervical disc herniation. This study provides a comprehensive cost analysis of ACDF and PCDF in this patient population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 282 geriatric patients who underwent ACDF or PCDF for cervical disc herniation over a 12-year period were analyzed to assess total surgical costs, including preoperative, procedural, and postoperative expenses. Analysis of variance with post-hoc Tukey Honestly Significant Difference test was used in a propensity score-matched cohort to compare cost differences between ACDF and PCDF across various cost categories.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In a geriatric cohort of 282 patients with cervical disc herniation meeting inclusion criteria, 221 (78.4%) underwent ACDF and 61 (21.6%) received PCDF (2–4 levels). The average age was 71.3 ± 5.6 years, with no significant demographic differences between groups. On analysis of variance, rehabilitation costs were 1.88 times higher (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and blood bank costs were 2.16 times higher (<em>P</em> = 0.04) for PCDF patients, corresponding with significantly greater estimated blood loss (209.9 ± 217.7 mL vs. 66.7 ± 107.0 mL; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). After propensity score matching, PCDF remained associated with significantly higher rehabilitation costs (+170.79%; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), blood bank costs (+139.29%; <em>P</em> = 0.005), and total procedural costs (+33.92%; <em>P</em> = 0.015).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ACDF procedures in geriatric patients with cervical disc herniation are significantly cheaper than PCDF in terms of rehabilitation and blood bank costs, offering valuable insights for optimizing neurosurgical decision-making and high-value care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 123798"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875025001548","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Despite the surge in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) procedures over the past 2 decades, there remains a paucity of data on their comparative costs in geriatric patients with cervical disc herniation. This study provides a comprehensive cost analysis of ACDF and PCDF in this patient population.

Methods

A total of 282 geriatric patients who underwent ACDF or PCDF for cervical disc herniation over a 12-year period were analyzed to assess total surgical costs, including preoperative, procedural, and postoperative expenses. Analysis of variance with post-hoc Tukey Honestly Significant Difference test was used in a propensity score-matched cohort to compare cost differences between ACDF and PCDF across various cost categories.

Results

In a geriatric cohort of 282 patients with cervical disc herniation meeting inclusion criteria, 221 (78.4%) underwent ACDF and 61 (21.6%) received PCDF (2–4 levels). The average age was 71.3 ± 5.6 years, with no significant demographic differences between groups. On analysis of variance, rehabilitation costs were 1.88 times higher (P < 0.001), and blood bank costs were 2.16 times higher (P = 0.04) for PCDF patients, corresponding with significantly greater estimated blood loss (209.9 ± 217.7 mL vs. 66.7 ± 107.0 mL; P < 0.001). After propensity score matching, PCDF remained associated with significantly higher rehabilitation costs (+170.79%; P < 0.001), blood bank costs (+139.29%; P = 0.005), and total procedural costs (+33.92%; P = 0.015).

Conclusions

ACDF procedures in geriatric patients with cervical disc herniation are significantly cheaper than PCDF in terms of rehabilitation and blood bank costs, offering valuable insights for optimizing neurosurgical decision-making and high-value care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年颈椎间盘突出症患者多水平ACDF与PCDF的单机构回顾性倾向评分匹配比较成本分析
引言:尽管在过去的二十年中,前路颈椎椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACDF)和后路颈椎减压和融合术(PCDF)的应用激增,但关于它们在老年颈椎间盘突出患者中比较成本的数据仍然缺乏。本研究提供了ACDF和PCDF在该患者群体中的综合成本分析。方法:对282例12年内行ACDF或PCDF治疗颈椎间盘突出症的老年患者进行分析,评估手术总费用,包括术前、手术和术后费用。在倾向评分匹配的队列中使用方差分析和事后Tukey HSD检验来比较ACDF和PCDF在不同成本类别中的成本差异。结果:在282例符合纳入标准的颈椎间盘突出患者的老年队列中,221例(78.4%)接受了ACDF, 61例(21.6%)接受了PCDF(2-4级)。平均年龄为71.3±5.6岁,组间无统计学差异。结论:ACDF治疗老年颈椎间盘突出症患者的康复和血库费用明显低于PCDF,为优化神经外科决策和高价值护理提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
期刊最新文献
A systematic review with meta-analysis of the mastoid emissary foramen: implications for posterior cranial fossa surgery. Letter to the Editor Regarding The Effect of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists on Reoperation Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. A fixed left-sided surgeon position in unilateral biportal endoscopic surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a technical note with variations according to herniation type. DO I WANT TO BE AN ENIGMA? Preoperative cervical vertebral bone quality score as a predictor of adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1