Validation of Malayalam Translation of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (MSSQ): A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Seminars in Speech and Language Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1055/s-0045-1802958
Srirangam Vijayakumar Narasimhan, Daya R Nair
{"title":"Validation of Malayalam Translation of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (MSSQ): A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Srirangam Vijayakumar Narasimhan, Daya R Nair","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1802958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study aimed to cross-linguistically adapt the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire in Malayalam (MSSQ) and to determine its psychometric properties. The objectives of our study were to document the test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and discriminant validity of MSSQ. The SSQ was translated from English to Malayalam, and was administered to 55 Malayalam-speaking participants with oropharyngeal dysphagia and 55 age- and gender-matched Malayalam speakers with normal swallowing ability. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test was performed to check the normality of the data. Cronbach's alpha was used to measure the test-retest reliability. Internal consistency was measured through split-half reliability using the Spearman-Brown correlation coefficient. The discriminant validity was documented using the Mann-Whitney U-test. The Cronbach's alpha value for the total MSSQ scores was 0.99, indicating a strong positive correlation between the test and retest scores. The Spearman-Brown correlation coefficient was 0.97, indicating that the MSSQ had excellent internal consistency. Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test revealed that Group 1 participants had significantly higher MSSQ scores than Group 2 participants, exhibiting excellent discriminant validity. It was concluded that the MSSQ was a valid and reliable tool to assess the symptoms of dysphagia among Malayalam speakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48772,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Speech and Language","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Speech and Language","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1802958","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to cross-linguistically adapt the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire in Malayalam (MSSQ) and to determine its psychometric properties. The objectives of our study were to document the test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and discriminant validity of MSSQ. The SSQ was translated from English to Malayalam, and was administered to 55 Malayalam-speaking participants with oropharyngeal dysphagia and 55 age- and gender-matched Malayalam speakers with normal swallowing ability. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test was performed to check the normality of the data. Cronbach's alpha was used to measure the test-retest reliability. Internal consistency was measured through split-half reliability using the Spearman-Brown correlation coefficient. The discriminant validity was documented using the Mann-Whitney U-test. The Cronbach's alpha value for the total MSSQ scores was 0.99, indicating a strong positive correlation between the test and retest scores. The Spearman-Brown correlation coefficient was 0.97, indicating that the MSSQ had excellent internal consistency. Mann-Whitney U-test revealed that Group 1 participants had significantly higher MSSQ scores than Group 2 participants, exhibiting excellent discriminant validity. It was concluded that the MSSQ was a valid and reliable tool to assess the symptoms of dysphagia among Malayalam speakers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
悉尼燕子问卷(MSSQ)马拉雅拉姆语翻译的验证:一项前瞻性横断面研究。
本研究的目的是跨语言适应悉尼燕子问卷在马拉雅拉姆语(MSSQ),并确定其心理测量特性。本研究的目的是记录MSSQ的重测信度、内部一致性和判别效度。SSQ从英语翻译成马拉雅拉姆语,并对55名患有口咽吞咽困难的马拉雅拉姆语参与者和55名年龄和性别匹配的吞咽能力正常的马拉雅拉姆语参与者进行了管理。采用Kolmogorov-Smirnov正态性检验检验数据的正态性。采用Cronbach’s alpha测量重测信度。内部一致性通过使用Spearman-Brown相关系数的分半信度来测量。判别效度采用Mann-Whitney u检验。MSSQ总分的Cronbach’s alpha值为0.99,表明测试与重测得分之间存在较强的正相关。Spearman-Brown相关系数为0.97,说明MSSQ具有良好的内部一致性。Mann-Whitney u检验结果显示,第一组被试的MSSQ得分显著高于第二组,具有极好的判别效度。结论是,MSSQ是评估马拉雅拉姆语使用者吞咽困难症状的有效和可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Speech and Language
Seminars in Speech and Language AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Seminars in Speech and Language is a topic driven review journal that covers the entire spectrum of speech language pathology. In each issue, a leading specialist covers diagnostic procedures, screening and assessment techniques, treatment protocols, as well as short and long-term management practices in areas such as apraxia, communication, stuttering, autism, dysphagia, attention, phonological intervention, memory as well as other disorders.
期刊最新文献
Recognizing the Complexity and Richness of African American English (AAE) as Literate Language. Relationship Between Measures of Dialect and Teacher Ratings of Student Language Ability. Teachers' Beliefs About Child AAE Speakers' Language and Narratives: A Qualitative Exploration of Language Beliefs and Informal Narrative Assessment. Awareness of Ableism in the Context of Stuttering Among Speech-Language Pathologists in India. Fostering Happiness in Speech-Language Pathology Education: An Integrated Approach to Self-Care, Service, and Gratitude.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1