[Ensuring the patient does not become an adversary-a "how to" guide for handling allegations of medical malpractice].

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urologie Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1007/s00120-025-02536-2
H Schülke, C Süfke, A J Gross
{"title":"[Ensuring the patient does not become an adversary-a \"how to\" guide for handling allegations of medical malpractice].","authors":"H Schülke, C Süfke, A J Gross","doi":"10.1007/s00120-025-02536-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>If there is an allegation of medical malpractice, it significantly strains the physician-patient relationship. To avoid a conflict-ridden dispute with the patient, it is crucial to internally analyze the course of treatment. The legal focus is on whether the patient's complaints are attributable to medical misconduct or if they stem from an inevitable complication that is part of the treatment's risk spectrum. Additionally, the insights gained from the internal review help establish operating procedures and responsibilities. Open communication promotes the recognition of any misconduct and contributes to its prevention in the future. If medical malpractice is suspected, the competent departments should be informed early, and the documentation of the hospital treatment should be checked for completeness and plausibility. Moreover, a transparent explanation of the treatment course-regardless of fault-alleviates patient's fears and concerns, which can help to avoid potential conflict situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":29782,"journal":{"name":"Urologie","volume":" ","pages":"335-343"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-025-02536-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

If there is an allegation of medical malpractice, it significantly strains the physician-patient relationship. To avoid a conflict-ridden dispute with the patient, it is crucial to internally analyze the course of treatment. The legal focus is on whether the patient's complaints are attributable to medical misconduct or if they stem from an inevitable complication that is part of the treatment's risk spectrum. Additionally, the insights gained from the internal review help establish operating procedures and responsibilities. Open communication promotes the recognition of any misconduct and contributes to its prevention in the future. If medical malpractice is suspected, the competent departments should be informed early, and the documentation of the hospital treatment should be checked for completeness and plausibility. Moreover, a transparent explanation of the treatment course-regardless of fault-alleviates patient's fears and concerns, which can help to avoid potential conflict situations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[确保病人不会成为对手——处理医疗事故指控的“如何”指南]。
如果存在医疗事故的指控,则会严重紧张医患关系。为了避免与患者发生冲突,对治疗过程进行内部分析至关重要。法律的重点是,病人的抱怨是由于医疗不当行为,还是源于治疗风险范围内不可避免的并发症。此外,从内部审查中获得的见解有助于建立操作程序和职责。开放的沟通促进了对任何不当行为的认识,并有助于在未来预防不当行为。怀疑有医疗事故的,应当及早通知有关主管部门,并对医院治疗记录进行完整、可信的核查。此外,一个透明的治疗过程的解释-不管错误-减轻病人的恐惧和担忧,这可以帮助避免潜在的冲突情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urologie
Urologie UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Shock waves for comrades. Urology as a topic in GDR newspapers (1946-1990)]. [Update of S3 guideline on metastatic prostate cancer-guideline recommendations and expert consensus]. [Update of the S2k guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS)]. [Primary vesicoureteral reflux in childhood : Diagnostics, risk stratification and treatment]. [At-home tests in the healthcare market-opportunities, limitations, and clear oversight using the example of PSA home testing].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1