Consultation frequency patterns for older patients in Danish general practice: a nationwide register-based cohort study.

IF 2 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-10-27 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0234
Jonas K Olsen, Sonja Wehberg, Frans Boch Waldorff, Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen, Jesper Lykkegaard
{"title":"Consultation frequency patterns for older patients in Danish general practice: a nationwide register-based cohort study.","authors":"Jonas K Olsen, Sonja Wehberg, Frans Boch Waldorff, Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen, Jesper Lykkegaard","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There may be distinctly different ways for general practices to serve the growing population of older patients, providing them different combinations of face-to-face, telephone, and email consultations; home visits; and chronic care reviews.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify latent general practice profiles of frequency and combination of consultation types for older patients and relate them to practice characteristics.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Register-based cohort study of all Danish citizens aged ≥75 years.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>For each of the years 2017-2021, a latent profile analysis was conducted on the practices' frequencies of consultation types, adjusting for patient population characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a 'Majority' and the following three temporary latent profiles of provision of consultation services to older patients: the 'Phone heavy' profile (9%-10% of practices, 2017-2019), which provided nearly double the telephone consultations as the 'Majority' profile and was associated with the GPs being older and working single-handed; the 'High frequency' profile (12%-14% of practices, 2017-2018), which provided higher levels of face-to-face, telephone, and email consultations than the 'Majority' profile; and the 'Phone and email heavy' profile (7% of practices, 2020), which provided more email than face-to-face consultations, and more of each consultation than the 'Majority' profile. The number of profiles decreased from three in 2017 to only the 'Majority' profile in 2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a trend towards a more uniform pattern of consultations for older patients in general practice. It is unknown whether high provision of certain types of consultations in general practice has downstream effects such as decreased need for hospital and out-of-hours services.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12728877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There may be distinctly different ways for general practices to serve the growing population of older patients, providing them different combinations of face-to-face, telephone, and email consultations; home visits; and chronic care reviews.

Aim: To identify latent general practice profiles of frequency and combination of consultation types for older patients and relate them to practice characteristics.

Design & setting: Register-based cohort study of all Danish citizens aged ≥75 years.

Method: For each of the years 2017-2021, a latent profile analysis was conducted on the practices' frequencies of consultation types, adjusting for patient population characteristics.

Results: We identified a 'Majority' and the following three temporary latent profiles of provision of consultation services to older patients: the 'Phone heavy' profile (9%-10% of practices, 2017-2019), which provided nearly double the telephone consultations as the 'Majority' profile and was associated with the GPs being older and working single-handed; the 'High frequency' profile (12%-14% of practices, 2017-2018), which provided higher levels of face-to-face, telephone, and email consultations than the 'Majority' profile; and the 'Phone and email heavy' profile (7% of practices, 2020), which provided more email than face-to-face consultations, and more of each consultation than the 'Majority' profile. The number of profiles decreased from three in 2017 to only the 'Majority' profile in 2021.

Conclusion: There is a trend towards a more uniform pattern of consultations for older patients in general practice. It is unknown whether high provision of certain types of consultations in general practice has downstream effects such as decreased need for hospital and out-of-hours services.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹麦全科医生中老年患者的咨询频率模式。
背景:全科医生可能有明显不同的方式来服务日益增长的老年患者,为他们提供面对面、电话和电子邮件咨询、家访和慢性护理回顾的不同组合。目的:确定老年患者会诊类型的频率和组合的潜在全科概况,并将其与实践特征联系起来。设计与设置:所有年龄≥75岁的丹麦公民的基于登记的队列研究。方法:对2017-2021年的每一年,根据患者群体特征调整就诊类型的实践频率进行潜在剖面分析。结果:我们确定了为老年患者提供咨询服务的“大多数”和三个临时潜在概况:“电话密集”人群(2017-2019年占8-10%)提供的电话咨询几乎是“多数”人群的两倍,并且与全科医生年龄较大且单刀工作有关,“高频”人群(2017-2018年占12-14%)提供的面对面、电话和电子邮件咨询的水平高于“多数”人群,“电话和电子邮件密集”人群(占7%)。2020年)提供的电子邮件多于面对面咨询,每次咨询的次数多于“多数”配置文件。配置文件的数量从2017年的3个减少到2021年的“多数”配置文件。结论:在全科实践中,老年患者的咨询有一个更统一的模式的趋势。目前尚不清楚在普通医疗中大量提供某些类型的咨询是否会产生下游影响,例如减少对住院和非工作时间服务的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of an audit and feedback intervention to improve cervical screening uptake. Nurses delivering person-centred multiple long-term condition reviews in primary care: a secondary analysis of qualitative data. Insights into general practice research in the Netherlands and Germany: methodical challenges and suggestions. Topical treatment use and under-use in childhood eczema: secondary analysis of RCTs and cohort data in the UK and the Netherlands. Building clinical trials readiness in primary and community care: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1