Consultation frequency patterns for older patients in Danish general practice.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0234
Jonas Korsholm Olsen, Sonja Wehberg, Frans Boch Waldorff, Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen, Jesper Lykkegaard
{"title":"Consultation frequency patterns for older patients in Danish general practice.","authors":"Jonas Korsholm Olsen, Sonja Wehberg, Frans Boch Waldorff, Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen, Jesper Lykkegaard","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There may be distinctly different ways for general practices to serve the growing population of older patients, providing them different combinations of face-to-face-, telephone-, and e-mail consultations, home visits, and chronic care reviews.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify latent general practice profiles of frequency and combination of consultation types for older patients and relate them to practice characteristics.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Register-based cohort study of all Danish citizens aged≥75 years.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>For each of the years 2017-2021, a latent profile analysis was conducted on the practices' frequencies of consultation types adjusting for patient population characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a \"Majority\" and three temporary latent profiles of provision of consultation services to older patients: The \"Phone heavy\" profile (8-10% of practices, 2017-2019) providing nearly double the telephone consultations as the \"Majority\" profile and was associated with the general practitioners being older and working singlehanded, the \"High frequency\" profile (12-14% of practices, 2017-2018) providing higher levels of face-to-face, telephone, and e-mail consultations than the \"Majority\" profile, and the \"Phone and e-mail heavy\" profile (7% of practices, 2020) providing more e-mail than face-to-face consultations, and more of each consultation than the \"Majority\" profile. The number of profiles decreased from 3 in 2017 to only the \"Majority\" profile 2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a trend towards a more uniform pattern of consultations for older patients in general practice. It is unknown whether high provision of certain types of consultations in general practice has downstream effects, such as decreased need for hospital- and out-of-hours services.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There may be distinctly different ways for general practices to serve the growing population of older patients, providing them different combinations of face-to-face-, telephone-, and e-mail consultations, home visits, and chronic care reviews.

Aim: To identify latent general practice profiles of frequency and combination of consultation types for older patients and relate them to practice characteristics.

Design & setting: Register-based cohort study of all Danish citizens aged≥75 years.

Method: For each of the years 2017-2021, a latent profile analysis was conducted on the practices' frequencies of consultation types adjusting for patient population characteristics.

Results: We identified a "Majority" and three temporary latent profiles of provision of consultation services to older patients: The "Phone heavy" profile (8-10% of practices, 2017-2019) providing nearly double the telephone consultations as the "Majority" profile and was associated with the general practitioners being older and working singlehanded, the "High frequency" profile (12-14% of practices, 2017-2018) providing higher levels of face-to-face, telephone, and e-mail consultations than the "Majority" profile, and the "Phone and e-mail heavy" profile (7% of practices, 2020) providing more e-mail than face-to-face consultations, and more of each consultation than the "Majority" profile. The number of profiles decreased from 3 in 2017 to only the "Majority" profile 2021.

Conclusion: There is a trend towards a more uniform pattern of consultations for older patients in general practice. It is unknown whether high provision of certain types of consultations in general practice has downstream effects, such as decreased need for hospital- and out-of-hours services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
De-labelling erroneous penicillin allergy records in general practice: healthcare professionals' experiences. General practice specialty decision-making: a system-level Australian qualitative study. Sex differences in the prescription of anti-hypertensive medications in primary care patients. Consultation frequency patterns for older patients in Danish general practice. Diagnostic information in GP referral letters to a memory clinic: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1