Perceptions of and Opportunities for AMTA Journals: A Mixed Methods Study.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Journal of Music Therapy Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1093/jmt/thaf001
Laura E Beer, Ananya Muralidharan, Jaley A Montgomery, Leah Quiller, Barbara A Else, Blythe LaGasse
{"title":"Perceptions of and Opportunities for AMTA Journals: A Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Laura E Beer, Ananya Muralidharan, Jaley A Montgomery, Leah Quiller, Barbara A Else, Blythe LaGasse","doi":"10.1093/jmt/thaf001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Journal of Music Therapy and Music Therapy Perspectives are journals sponsored by the American Music Therapy Association (AMTA). In recent years, the journal leadership teams have been focused on issues of inclusion, access, equity, and social justice, as they relate to the journals. This focus aligned with AMTA's reorganization process that began in the early 2020s, where principles of social justice were centered as part of the association's statements related to organizational change. The purpose of this mixed methods study was to gather data related to readers' use and perceptions of the journals, including perceptions regarding the integration of diversity and social justice. Board-certified music therapists (N = 409) met inclusion criteria and completed an online survey; these data were used to inform focus group questions. We then conducted five focus groups (N = 16 participants) to gather more personal and in-depth responses. Survey data indicated varying opinions related to the use of the journals and inclusion of social justice principles, whereas the focus groups were more unified in their assessment that more work is needed in this area. Participants in the focus groups brought forward issues related to inclusion and access. The readership indicated that the journals currently incorporate some aspects of these principles; however, many readers would like to see more intentional integration of these principles across the journals. Focus group members also provided a variety of action steps for consideration as the journals move forward.</p>","PeriodicalId":47143,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Music Therapy","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Music Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/thaf001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Journal of Music Therapy and Music Therapy Perspectives are journals sponsored by the American Music Therapy Association (AMTA). In recent years, the journal leadership teams have been focused on issues of inclusion, access, equity, and social justice, as they relate to the journals. This focus aligned with AMTA's reorganization process that began in the early 2020s, where principles of social justice were centered as part of the association's statements related to organizational change. The purpose of this mixed methods study was to gather data related to readers' use and perceptions of the journals, including perceptions regarding the integration of diversity and social justice. Board-certified music therapists (N = 409) met inclusion criteria and completed an online survey; these data were used to inform focus group questions. We then conducted five focus groups (N = 16 participants) to gather more personal and in-depth responses. Survey data indicated varying opinions related to the use of the journals and inclusion of social justice principles, whereas the focus groups were more unified in their assessment that more work is needed in this area. Participants in the focus groups brought forward issues related to inclusion and access. The readership indicated that the journals currently incorporate some aspects of these principles; however, many readers would like to see more intentional integration of these principles across the journals. Focus group members also provided a variety of action steps for consideration as the journals move forward.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
音乐治疗期刊》和《音乐治疗视角》是由美国音乐治疗协会 (AMTA) 主办的期刊。近年来,期刊领导团队一直关注与期刊相关的包容、获取、公平和社会正义问题。这一重点与 20 世纪 20 年代初开始的美国音乐治疗协会重组进程相一致,社会公正原则是协会组织变革声明的核心内容。这项混合方法研究的目的是收集读者对期刊的使用和看法的相关数据,包括对多样性和社会正义整合的看法。经委员会认证的音乐治疗师(N = 409)符合纳入标准,并完成了在线调查;这些数据被用于重点小组问题。然后,我们进行了五次焦点小组讨论(N = 16 名参与者),以收集更多个人和更深入的回答。调查数据显示,在期刊的使用和纳入社会公正原则方面存在不同意见,而焦点小组的评估则更加一致,认为在这一领域需要开展更多工作。焦点小组的参与者提出了与包容和获取有关的问题。读者表示,期刊目前纳入了这些原则的某些方面,但许多读者希望看到期刊更有意识地纳入这些原则。焦点小组成员还提出了各种行动步骤,供期刊在前进过程中考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Music Therapy
Journal of Music Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Integrative Review of Music and Music Therapy Interventions on Functional Outcomes in Children with Acquired Brain Injury. Attributes of Pediatric Music Therapists: A Qualitative Analysis of Parent Descriptions. Economic Evaluations of Music Therapy and Other Music-Based Interventions: A Scoping Review. Perceptions of and Opportunities for AMTA Journals: A Mixed Methods Study. Philosophical Reflections on Music Therapy Musicianship.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1