Evaluation of diagnostic methods for detection of trichomoniasis in symptomatic women with vaginal discharge.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Infection in Developing Countries Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.3855/jidc.18460
Gargee Mishra, Kavita Gupta, Srujana Mohanty, Subarna Mitra, Arvind Kumar Singh
{"title":"Evaluation of diagnostic methods for detection of trichomoniasis in symptomatic women with vaginal discharge.","authors":"Gargee Mishra, Kavita Gupta, Srujana Mohanty, Subarna Mitra, Arvind Kumar Singh","doi":"10.3855/jidc.18460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vaginal discharge is a common gynecological condition among reproductive age women. Common infections include bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and trichomoniasis. Prevalence of trichomoniasis varies with geographical area and the diagnostic techniques used. This study was conducted to compare various diagnostic methods for detection of trichomoniasis among women of the reproductive age group.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The study was conducted from January 2021 to July 2022, and 114 patients were included. Vaginal discharge was collected from the lateral wall of the vagina and posterior fornix using four swabs for bedside culture into Kuperberg media, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), wet mount, Giemsa staining, Gram staining, and culture on blood agar for Candida spp. Nugent scoring in Gram stain was used to determine BV.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>BV was identified in 21.05% (24/114), VVC in 6.14% (7/114), and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) in 4.4% (5/114) by PCR. However, TV was detected only in three patients by wet mount, Giemsa stain, and culture. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for wet mount and Giemsa stain were 100% for each parameter compared to culture; while sensitivity and specificity were calculated as 100% and 98.2% for PCR. All patients with TV presented with greenish frothy discharge (pH > 4.5) and vaginal wall inflammation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Culture remains the standard diagnostic approach and is cost effective; but it has major shortcomings such as the need for faster sample transportation and longer turnaround time. PCR can detect non-viable trichomonads and can provide early and accurate diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":49160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","volume":"19 1","pages":"155-161"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.18460","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Vaginal discharge is a common gynecological condition among reproductive age women. Common infections include bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and trichomoniasis. Prevalence of trichomoniasis varies with geographical area and the diagnostic techniques used. This study was conducted to compare various diagnostic methods for detection of trichomoniasis among women of the reproductive age group.

Methodology: The study was conducted from January 2021 to July 2022, and 114 patients were included. Vaginal discharge was collected from the lateral wall of the vagina and posterior fornix using four swabs for bedside culture into Kuperberg media, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), wet mount, Giemsa staining, Gram staining, and culture on blood agar for Candida spp. Nugent scoring in Gram stain was used to determine BV.

Result: BV was identified in 21.05% (24/114), VVC in 6.14% (7/114), and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) in 4.4% (5/114) by PCR. However, TV was detected only in three patients by wet mount, Giemsa stain, and culture. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for wet mount and Giemsa stain were 100% for each parameter compared to culture; while sensitivity and specificity were calculated as 100% and 98.2% for PCR. All patients with TV presented with greenish frothy discharge (pH > 4.5) and vaginal wall inflammation.

Conclusions: Culture remains the standard diagnostic approach and is cost effective; but it has major shortcomings such as the need for faster sample transportation and longer turnaround time. PCR can detect non-viable trichomonads and can provide early and accurate diagnosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
239
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries (JIDC) is an international journal, intended for the publication of scientific articles from Developing Countries by scientists from Developing Countries. JIDC is an independent, on-line publication with an international editorial board. JIDC is open access with no cost to view or download articles and reasonable cost for publication of research artcles, making JIDC easily availiable to scientists from resource restricted regions.
期刊最新文献
Acyclovir desensitization. A case report and a review of desensitization strategies. Antibiotics in the treatment of scrub typhus: A network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. Commensal mouth bacteria are the main cause of dentoalveolar abscesses in the maxillofacial region. Clinical behavior of COVID-19 in a reference public hospital in Mexico City during SARS-CoV-2 epidemiological waves. Clinical, epidemiological, and pathological findings of ovine gammaherpesvirus 2 infections in cattle from Southern Brazil.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1