Physician-Modified Endografts for Non-deferrable Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Using the Endurant Platform: Templates and Initial Results.

IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1177/15266028251318952
Francisco Álvarez Marcos, Andrés Reyes Valdivia, Mariano De Blas Bravo, Manuel Alonso Pérez
{"title":"Physician-Modified Endografts for Non-deferrable Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Using the Endurant Platform: Templates and Initial Results.","authors":"Francisco Álvarez Marcos, Andrés Reyes Valdivia, Mariano De Blas Bravo, Manuel Alonso Pérez","doi":"10.1177/15266028251318952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Complex abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair often requires the use of fenestrated and branched endografts, which can be influenced by factors such as device availability, cost, and operator expertise. This study aims to evaluate the preliminary results with physician-modified endografts (PMEGs) utilizing the Medtronic Endurant platform.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients unsuitable for other techniques or custom-made devices, in which a PMEG Endurant was used for repair between 2021 and 2024. Bidimensional templates of the Endurant endograft were developed to ensure precise fenestration placement, which was confirmed intraoperatively with a 3D-printed aortic template. Endpoints were technical success, mortality, reinterventions, and target vessel patency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven target vessels in 18 patients (mean age 79.4 ± 9 years, 94% male) were treated with Endurant main bodies (n=10, 55.6%), abdominal tubes (n=4, 22.2%), or aortic extensions (n=4, 22.2%). Mean aneurysm diameter was 70.0 ± 23 mm. Mean number of fenestrations was 2.1 ± 1 (33.3% 3-FEN or 4-FEN). The most frequent bridging stents were iCover (n=15, 40.5%), BeGraft (n=10, 27.0%), and VBX (n=9, 24.3%). Mean implantation time was 198.9 ± 90 minutes. Technical success was achieved in all but one case (n=17, 94%), with no 30 day mortality, no reinterventions, and 100% target vessel patency at a median follow-up of 10 months. Three patients (16.7%) died of non aortic-related causes. One residual type IA endoleak was adverted in computed tomography scan controls and was left untreated according to patient's decision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PMEG utilizing the Medtronic Endurant endograft, supported by bidimensional templates and 3D-printed confirmation models, provided safe and effective short-term outcomes for complex, non-deferrable AAA repair. Long-term data and a prospective study on PMEG with a standardized protocol would allow for evidence to arise on this technique, facilitating adequate comparisons with custom-made and off-the-shelf devices.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>This short series highlights the initial outcomes of physician-modified endografts (PMEG) using the Medtronic Endurant platform. Dedicated 2D templates for all Endurant sizes are provided as supplementary material, offering valuable assistance to practitioners in the vascular community. A standardized modification protocol, based on these templates along with the double-check of a sterile 3D-printed model, has allowed to achieve satisfactory short term outcomes. These outcomes are comparable to those of custom-made devices, even in scenarios requiring non-deferrable repairs and involving challenging anatomic constraints, such as type 1A endoleaks.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251318952"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251318952","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Complex abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair often requires the use of fenestrated and branched endografts, which can be influenced by factors such as device availability, cost, and operator expertise. This study aims to evaluate the preliminary results with physician-modified endografts (PMEGs) utilizing the Medtronic Endurant platform.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients unsuitable for other techniques or custom-made devices, in which a PMEG Endurant was used for repair between 2021 and 2024. Bidimensional templates of the Endurant endograft were developed to ensure precise fenestration placement, which was confirmed intraoperatively with a 3D-printed aortic template. Endpoints were technical success, mortality, reinterventions, and target vessel patency.

Results: Thirty-seven target vessels in 18 patients (mean age 79.4 ± 9 years, 94% male) were treated with Endurant main bodies (n=10, 55.6%), abdominal tubes (n=4, 22.2%), or aortic extensions (n=4, 22.2%). Mean aneurysm diameter was 70.0 ± 23 mm. Mean number of fenestrations was 2.1 ± 1 (33.3% 3-FEN or 4-FEN). The most frequent bridging stents were iCover (n=15, 40.5%), BeGraft (n=10, 27.0%), and VBX (n=9, 24.3%). Mean implantation time was 198.9 ± 90 minutes. Technical success was achieved in all but one case (n=17, 94%), with no 30 day mortality, no reinterventions, and 100% target vessel patency at a median follow-up of 10 months. Three patients (16.7%) died of non aortic-related causes. One residual type IA endoleak was adverted in computed tomography scan controls and was left untreated according to patient's decision.

Conclusion: PMEG utilizing the Medtronic Endurant endograft, supported by bidimensional templates and 3D-printed confirmation models, provided safe and effective short-term outcomes for complex, non-deferrable AAA repair. Long-term data and a prospective study on PMEG with a standardized protocol would allow for evidence to arise on this technique, facilitating adequate comparisons with custom-made and off-the-shelf devices.

Clinical impact: This short series highlights the initial outcomes of physician-modified endografts (PMEG) using the Medtronic Endurant platform. Dedicated 2D templates for all Endurant sizes are provided as supplementary material, offering valuable assistance to practitioners in the vascular community. A standardized modification protocol, based on these templates along with the double-check of a sterile 3D-printed model, has allowed to achieve satisfactory short term outcomes. These outcomes are comparable to those of custom-made devices, even in scenarios requiring non-deferrable repairs and involving challenging anatomic constraints, such as type 1A endoleaks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
期刊最新文献
Electrosurgical In Situ Fenestration of Aortic Endograft. Videolaparoscopic-Guided Saccography and Direct Sac Embolization After Standard EVAR. In Vitro Investigation of Microcatheter Behavior During Microsphere Injection in Transarterial Radioembolization. Gore Tag Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis in Acute Aortic Syndromes: A Case Series. Radiographic Characterization of Inferior Vena Cava and Its Reaction Following Filter Placement: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1